Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 14859 articles
Browse latest View live

First Nighter: 'Les Miserables' Returns in Sizzling 21st-Century Upgrade

$
0
0
There was a time when musicals bought for the movies had a contract clause stipulating that the film version couldn't be released until after the Broadway run ended. The reasoning was that if the public could see the movie, they'd have no desire to see the live production. Made sense, didn't it?

Apparently not, since that time is long gone. Nowadays -- when more movies are being turned into Broadway musicals than the other way around -- it's very different. Chicago was named best movie of the year 2002, and the Broadway revival is still around -- with Bebe Neuwirth, the original Velma, now game to play Mama Morton.

And then there's Cameron Mackintosh's beloved -- by him and the public -- Les Miserables, which only two years after the blockbuster flick was released is packing them in on London's West End and about to do the same yet again on the Great White Way at the Imperial. That's where it played from 1990 to 2002 and where there's a medallion on the sidewalk commemorating its accomplishment.

But get this!: This isn't your grandfather's Les Miz, as it's more familiarly known. It's the new and enhanced-in-some-ways-diminished-in-others Les Miz, and it very much takes into account the movie and the possible expectations that it's planted in the eyes, ears and minds of ticket buyers.

Take note: The first English go-round -- after the Claude-Michel Schonberg/Alain Boublil-Jean-Marc Natel undertaking was imported to the Royal Shakespeare Company from France and Herbert Kretzmer supplied English lyrics -- was directed by Trevor Nunn and John Caird and designed by John Napier and went on to win nine Tonys but included no credit for projections.

Not so, Mackintosh's updated-for-the-21st-century Les Miz. It's directed by recent Mackintosh faves Laurence Connor and James Powell. Perhaps even more significantly, it boasts projections by Fifty-Nine Productions in order to provide the tuner with a cinematic appeal to spectators hungering for something of the sort after wallowing in the movie.

When Jean Valjean (Ramin Karimloo) carries the wounded Marius (Andy Mientus) through the Paris sewers and is pursued by Javert (Will Swenson), the shifting gloomy-grey 3D-like vistas that Fifty-Nine Productions flash offer new thrills and chills. In addition, Paule Constable's lighting emphasizes more than before the chiaroscuro attributes that French Revolution-struck Eugene Delacroix got onto his canvases. Matt Kinley's set and image design is "inspired by" Victor Hugo's paintings, and that's an atmospheric plus.

We all know who Victor Hugo is, don't we? He's not only a painter but the scribe who dreamed up the operatic 1862 tale of Jean Valjean who stole a loaf of bread for his sister's dying son, was enslaved on a galleon for 19 years and when released, lifted some candlesticks but was admonished by kindly Bishop of Digne (Adam Monley) and thereupon became an upright citizen and even mayor, though still pursued by the determined Javert for skipping parole.

Having promised the shamed Fantine (Caissie Levy) that he'd raise her daughter Cosette (Samantha Hill as the older incarnation), here virtually enslaved as a child (Angeli Negron or McKayla Twiggs) to innkeeper Thenardier (Cliff Saunders) and Madame Thenardier (Keala Settle), Jean Valjean keeps his word.

Of course, that requires him to join revolutionaries Marius and Enjolras (Kyle Scatliffe) on the 1832 barricades. And then there's Eponine (Nikki M. James), in unrequited love with Marius and gallant young Gavroche (Joshua Colley or Gaten Matarazzo) proving themselves in battle.

Okay, the above synopsis is admittedly sketchy but no sketchier than the Nunn-Caird adaptation of the Boublil libretto has ever been. No sense in carrying on about that now, however. The hop-skip-jump approach, which leaves the initially broad-loaf episode to exposition, apparently works well enough for a sturdy tale that perhaps, as Hugo penned it, is plum material for anthems from start to finish.

Schonberg certainly came up with melodies that lodge deeply in the brain and refuse expulsion. Kretzmer's lyrics -- though rhymed couplets on "be" and "me" and "Javert" and "there" abound excessively -- can be uncannily moving. They were in John Cameron's original orchestrations, and they are again in the new orchestrations by Christopher Jahnke, Stephen Metcalfe and Stephen Brooker.

Little need to mention them all, since many if not most of the Les Miz lovers flocking into the Imperial will be humming the tunes on the way in as well as on the way out. Nevertheless, I will specify my favorite single note in Schonberg's score. It's the plunging one on the word "night" in Fantine's "I Dreamed a Dream." It's in the lyric "But the tigers come at night." Rarely has night fallen so abruptly, and it gets me every time.

It did again when Levy delivered it with all the emotional subtlety built into the lyric and then some. Levy isn't alone at rendering the Schonberg-Kretzmer songs as beautifully as they've even been rendered. The trios involving Marius, Cosette and Eponine are particularly lovely. James's "On My Own" is tough and touching. Mientus's "Empty Chairs at Empty Tables" is especially effective, since Mientus, who up until then had seemed a shade callow as Marius, brings a mature disillusion to the sorrowful words.

Then there are Karimloo and Swenson and the numbers they sound out in their cat-and-mouse endeavors. When positioned downstage center (where so many of the singers are compulsively placed), both sing with power that rocks the rafters and stirs the audience. They're both on the young side for the men they portray, and that could be viewed as detrimental. When, for instance, Javert is standing on the bridge before diving to his death from it (wonderful projections there, too), he's meant to be an old man who wasted his life in a wrongful pursuit. It's not the impression given here.

Whatever. At this point, Les Miserables is entrenched in our culture as a musical for the ages. You can't beat it with a stick. So just go ahead and beat a path to it. And when you do, notice that on the program the sole producer named is Cameron Mackintosh. How often does that happen nowadays? Like never?

One final big plus for this revival: It means Gerard Alessandrini, with the next Forbidden Broadway edition, Forbidden Broadway Comes Out Swinging!, now playing at the Davenport, can revel in his own revival. Yes, fun lovers, he can revive his hilarious Les Miz send-up. What fun it'll be to see that one again, with its thigh-slapping take on the now highly revered march-towards-the-footlights choreographic maneuver.

Angels or Devils

$
0
0
There are many reasons why arts organizations today are facing cash constraints: lower demand, aging donor bases, substitute forms of entertainment, and on and on. These are serious, problematic and long-lasting challenges facing most of us.

But there is one reason that a subset of arts organizations are facing difficulties that can and must be avoided at all cost: the loss of one, incredibly important donor whose gifts were so large that the organization does not know how to move forward without them.

It might seem like a dream scenario when one donor provides huge amounts to one arts organization. One doesn't have to spend time cultivating new donors nor worry that the bills won't be paid. For organizations in cash flow crisis, the thought of one donor giving half the annual budget seems too good to pass up. And it is often too good to be true.

When the donor dies, loses interest, marches off in a huff, or simply has no more to give, the organization is left with a budget that can be 50% more than it can support.

Then the dream turns into a nightmare.

I have witnessed this scenario time after time over the past two decades. A major donor gives huge annual gifts, the budget increases dramatically and then, all of a sudden, the money stops flowing and a huge cash crisis is experienced as commitments made for productions in the good times cannot be paid for. The pain experienced is great and the problem extends far beyond the sudden loss of revenue.

For these mega-donors frequently expect power that is not appropriate for one person to hold; I know of instances where these donors controlled who was on the board, which works were performed, how the season was marketed and who was the artistic director.

If the donor walks away--and they usually do eventually--the organization is not just cash poor; it is also saddled with strategies, board members, operating systems and staff that are not necessarily optimal. Or even appropriate.

No donor, no matter how generous, should have this power. It is the senior staff and the entire board that must make all decisions that influence the pursuit of the organizational mission, not one person. The boards of all arts organizations have a duty to protect the mission of the institution; ceding this authority to one donor is dereliction of duty.

So should an arts organization desperately in need of funds reject a huge contribution?

Of course not.

But the rules about what power one donor may wield must be explicit and enforced.

And, more important, when a huge gift is received the board and staff must have the discipline to recognize that the organization is now essentially living beyond its sustainable means. They cannot count on this support forever.

They must place the gift into an endowment fund that earns a return in perpetuity, constrain spending to a level that would be sustainable without the donor's largesse or work diligently to expand the donor pool so that if the mega-donor departs, the institution does not face a sudden cash crisis that stops all positive momentum.

Our mega-donors are to be cherished. But they are not to be worshipped.

At San Francisco's de Young Museum: A Week of Art -- And Flowers

$
0
0
Art. Bouquets. More art. More bouquets. Once again San Francisco Bay Area floral designers have outdone themselves with their floral tributes to selected works in the de Young Museum collection.

The show, presented each year for just one week in March, gives Bay Area florists a chance to interpret various pieces in the museum's collection. This year's designs run from opulent, to funny, to sublime to knock-out gorgeous. For those who can't make it to the show, which runs through March 23, here are some highlights.

For a glimpse of last year's Bouquets to Art show -- also stunning -- check out "Leaves, Twigs and Seeds at the de Young -- It's Art, but Is It a Bouquet?"

Feeling Human at Bleecker Street Arts Club

$
0
0
Feeling Human, a group exhibition at the Bleecker Street Arts Club includes work by Mira Dancy, Austin Eddy and Ryan Schneider. Curated by Adam Mignanelli, of Ballast Projects, the exhibition maps the figurative as a talismanic presence that engages with the idea of completeness and longing.

Ryan Schneider

2014-03-23-ryan3.jpg


Ryan Schneider, "Tree of Ghosts," 2014, Oil on canvas, 30" x 26". Image courtesy of the artist and Bleecker Street Arts Club.


2014-03-23-ryan2.jpg


Ryan Schneider, "Gift of Desperation," 2013, Oil on canvas, 60" x 48". Image courtesy of the artist and Bleecker Street Arts Club.


Ryan Schneider's oil paintings include impressively stylized line work that weaves behind and over a centered figurative image. These lines behave like creeping branch vines, causing either symbiotic or sinister embraces. Schneider's backgrounds are night-black, with dominant figures (sometimes in watery deeps) that include a one-eyed woman in a bathing suit with a crescent moon, a horned staring mask, a baboon holding a houseplant and a tree with outlines of faint avian creatures on its branches, titled "Tree of Ghosts." Schneider's upcoming solo show, Ritual for Letting Go, will open at Two Rams, in the Lower East Side of New York, on April 6.

Austin Eddy

2014-03-23-austin1.jpg


Austin Eddy, Going Places, 2013, Caulking and ink on canvas, 14" x 11". Image courtesy of the artist and Bleecker Street Arts Club.


2014-03-23-austin2.jpg


Austin Eddy, There is Still a lot of Work to Do, 2013, 30" x 40". Image courtesy of the artist and Bleecker Street Arts Club.


Austin Eddy's wholesome grids of black, white and gray look like depression-era movie stills, starring a cast of dapper, pipe-toting gentlemen that appear mechanical and imbued with routine. Eddy uses charcoal, caulking and ink densely patterned on canvas, and his titles include "On the Road Again," "There is Still a Lot of Work to Do," and "Going Places." They carry a sense of nostalgia or longing, and the figures act as dream-like participants in the mechanics of labor.

Mira Dancy

2014-03-23-mira.jpg


Mira Dancy, Psychic Invite, 2014, Acrylic and ink on canvas, 69" x 66". Image courtesy of the artist and Bleecker Street Arts Club.


Mira Dancy's paintings evoke female fertility totems, like new-wave Venus of Willendorf figures. Her paintings include some textual mantras, such as "over" and "snake pose" along with symbols such as serpents, directional arrows, dial clocks and waves, dealing with cyclical or receding rhythms, both natural and artificial. Dancy's enticing sensuous figures often appear central in lotus position, and she uses wide and vibrating brush strokes of acrylic and ink on dyed or bleached cotton and canvas.

2014-03-23-mira2.jpg


Mira Dancy, Lover Letter Over, 2013, Acrylic and ink on dyed cotton, 66" x 48". Image courtesy of the artist and Bleecker Street Arts Club.

On Seeing Online: Circles and Signs

$
0
0
This edition of "On Seeing" includes new work made for the web, most seen here for the first time. It was created with support from curatorial intern, April Baca.

When I started this column in 2010, I wanted to create a contemporary art exhibition that you could view from the comfort of your home -- local coffee shop, classroom or wherever you go online. Since then, each edition of "On Seeing" has included a selection of artists' works revolving around an idea. But while previous "On Seeing" exhibitions include photographs or documentations of art, this new edition is different. What you see is not a series of representations, but an exhibition of the actual work, here and now, online.

When I put out a call to artists asking for submissions for this new version, I wasn't sure what to expect. How many artists made work for an online context? Would the submissions be sparse or overload my inbox? And most importantly, what would they be? I was curious. My excellent curatorial intern, April Baca, spread the word via Instagram and created a Facebook page for "On Seeing." Already, the project was growing in new and digital directions.

As it turned out, there was a lot of interest, but not many submissions at first. It appears from this limited case study that although a majority of art is viewed online, most artists are not making work exclusively for this context (excluding considerations of how a work will be photographed). As submissions came in, something else that surprised us was how many of these works made to be experienced online related to or connoted the physical body, so many, in fact, that this emerged as the theme for this first edition of "On Seeing: Online."

Article continues below the exhibition.



GX Jupitter-Larsen's How do you measure the distance between yourself and online?, 2014, captures the surrealism and the existential dilemma inherent in being a body in space and, simultaneously, a persona, idea or project playing out on a screen in front of you. That this is the position we so often find ourselves in adds a layer of urgency to this quietly playful rumination on contemporary life. Jupitter-Larsen wrote in an email discussing the work, "Perhaps when we want something so badly, we become the very opposite of what we strive for."

This idea taken to one extreme might resemble Jayme Odgers' QR Self-Portrait, 2014, one of a series of playful and incisive pieces made for and exhibited on Facebook. In cheerful red and white, it queries: Where is the line between what we are and what we desire, what we sense and what we buy and sell?

These questions go 'round and 'round Gina Osterloh's Infinite Booty, 2002. Bodies, or rather, images of bodies -- male as well as female -- purvey everything from diets and sex to cars and granola bars online. Osterloh's piece endearingly embodies both social critique and a dance party; it calls attention to the numbing quantity of sexualized female bodies online while simultaneously exuding the joyful buoyancy of pure movement. Osterloh explains, "I was inspired by both disgust and fascination with the auto-online gyrating hip pop-up videos of women."

Annetta Kapon
similarly fuses humor with critique. Play, 2013, is a photograph of a painting of a sign. The artist is seen holding a circle painted with a triangle. We have come to recognize this as the way to set a video, or other digital program, into motion. Here, Kapon directs her considerable wit at the prevalence of viewing art online; the arrow is a widely recognizable direction and, also, a theoretical game; Magritte's c'est ne pas cie une pipe (The Treachery of Images, 1929) continues to take on dimension and resonance in the digital era.

Weaving dreamily through images of nature and bodies moving in it Kireilyn Barber's Abyssal Zone, 2013, considers perceptual space and how we occupy it. One of a series of works with titles that, as Barber explains, "reference the light zones of the ocean, an environment at once seemingly limitless, but bounded by edges and confines, specifically that of its own material: water." Abyssal refers to the greatest depths of the sea, a dark, mysterious and pressured space, an intriguing reply to the questions posed throughout this exhibition, and articulated specifically in the title of Jupitter-Larsen's work. Don't recall it? Press 'play' and go back to the beginning; rest assured you won't wind up in the very same place.


Epilogue
Another set of ideas turned up, if less prominently, in the first set of submissions. This set the stage for the next edition of "On Seeing Online: Archive and Artifice". We have two pieces ready for that show, so please consider submitting your work and/or spreading the word. Join our Facebook page for submission information and updates.

Tucker Murray: Pop Star Rising

$
0
0
2014-03-21-TMC1.jpg


By the time Tucker Murray tore into the final bars of "Everyone Says" near the end of a recent set at the Cutting Room, the crowd was on its feet. And it wasn't just because the song's rousing pop hook seemed to levitate the club.

There was an unmistakable sense in the packed room - one of those moments you remember years later -- that a young star was being born in front of your eyes.

"You and me might be nothing at all, love, what does that mean?" Tucker sang, rising to his feet at the piano. "I'll be alright, I'm breaking the mold, but I don't care what everyone says."

As the performance finished to thunderous applause, a young woman heading for the exit turned to a friend and asked, "OK, I'm a believer. Where do I get the album?"

Imagine a rakishly handsome singer-songwriter who channels Justin Timberlake, a young Elton John and the ghost of Ellie Greenwich ("Be My Baby," "Chapel of Love") and you get a sense of the magic that Tucker Murray, 21, brings to his performances. Whether he's jamming with band members or crooning at the mic, he's got an onstage poise and pizazz that's remarkable for someone his age.

Call it hot -- and word is beginning to spread. You can check it out for yourself on April 18, when Tucker plays the Cutting Room in midtown Manhattan once again.

"There's a lot of luck required in show business, but when somebody comes along with the talent Tucker has, there's no way he's not going to succeed," said Paul Shaffer, Dave Letterman's legendary band leader, who's known him since he was a little boy.

"When you see him, you're reminded of Elton -- he was so melodic and Tucker has that same melodic sense. He's also got the same showmanship, which really can't be taught. He's the complete package, and he's just starting out."

It's heavy praise for the junior majoring in Literary Studies at Eugene Lang College The New School for Liberal Arts in Greenwich Village. He seems humble, even shy, with cheers still ringing in his ears.

"This is what I love to do, and I'm lucky to be able to write songs that reflect who I am," Tucker said. "There are times when I just need to get to the piano and express what's going on in my life. If I don't, I'll explode. I'm a young person in New York City. That's the reality I explore."

You could, of course, hear the exact same sentiments from thousands of other young performers waiting for a break in the Big Apple. On any given night, the number of talented artists here waiting -- no, aching -- to be noticed is almost frightening. It's easy to get lost in the shuffle.

But what sets Tucker Murray apart is his material. He writes richly-layered, melodic songs that sound contemporary but also recall an era when the Brill Building invented Top-40 radio, and some of America's greatest songwriters ruled the airwaves. Close your eyes during his set and you think Bruno Mars one moment, Neil Sedaka the next.

It's an appealing hybrid -- and no accident. Tucker has a proud family history, a rock and media lineage reaching back 50 years, and those roots have shaped him profoundly.

His mother, Susan Collins, is an ASCAP Award-winning songwriter and recording artist who has worked with Jimi Hendrix, John Lennon, Electric Light Orchestra, Joe Cocker, Kiss, Todd Rundgren and Darlene Love. She was interviewed for the Oscar-winning documentary Twenty Feet from Stardom and was the vocal coordinator for Saturday Night Live during its first five years. Collins is currently a private vocal coach at NYU's Clive Davis Institute of Recorded Music.

Tucker's father, Andy Caploe, is an award-winning music and radio producer, who developed sonic branding for Nickelodeon, Disney, Nick at Nite, TV Land and Bravo. He's produced a dozen or so feature film scores directed or produced by the likes of Paul Mazursky, Robert De Niro, Albert Maysles and others, and has performed voice characterizations for cartoon shows on Fox and Cartoon Network. His narrations for Audible.com now number more than 80 audio book titles.

But Tucker's most notable influence was his late godmother, Ellie Greenwich. She was a pop music titan -- a singer, songwriter and producer who wrote or co-wrote some of America's most enduring rock songs, including "Leader of the Pack," "River Deep, Mountain High," "Do Wah Diddy Diddy," "Christmas (Baby Please Come Home)," "Then He Kissed Me" and "Da Doo Ron Ron."

Greenwich was a close friend of Collins, and she had a lasting impact on Tucker (besides lighting a candle at his Bar Mitzvah). Born in New York City, he showed interest in music at a young age, playing the drums at a family friend's wedding when he was four, and writing his first song, about a trip to the mall, at six.

His first piano teacher, paternal grandmother Jeanne, trained Tucker as a classical pianist, but as his interest in performing grew, Greenwich's iconic songs -- played constantly in his home -- sparked his desire to test the showbiz waters.

He's launched himself on a time-honored path, playing gigs at the Cutting Room, Bitter End and other clubs, with a band that includes Oscar Bautista on guitar, Alex Pyle on bass and Rosie Slater on drums. Tucker writes prolifically, and inspirations for new songs come to him out of the blue.

"Everyone Says," co-written with his friend, Gracie Nash, took shape over an uptown lunch: "I said to her, 'For the first time I'm feeling so independent, doing my own thing and I don't care what anybody tells me, about who I'm supposed to love,' and she felt the same," he recalled.

"So we wrote this together, and I hit on a chord progression that reminded me of 'Be My Baby,' with a familiar 60s drumbeat. It just came out. Very random and strong."

He tells similar back stories for "Boyfriend," "Electricity" and other songs that pack his 75-minute set. Tucker records his own demos of the songs in his burgeoning ASCAP catalogue (Mother Tucker Music), and they're all bright, radio-friendly tunes that grab you with instant hooks -- just like the Brill Building did years ago.

"The thing about pop music is that it's all over the place, always looking for the next big thing," said Shaffer. "It goes through periods when songs don't have hooks at all, and everything sounds like the last ten songs you heard on the same station, over and over again.

"But Tucker is the kind of guy who can bring a new sound to what's happening, and before you know it, everybody will sound like him," he added. "He'll have the longevity -- and success -- that comes from being an original."



Photo of Tucker Murray by Em Grey.


facebook.com/MotherTuckerMusic
twitter.com/itstuckermurray
youtube.com/TuckerCaploe
instagram.com/mothertuckermurray

Jacob Hashimoto's Gas Giant at MOCA Pacific Design Center (PHOTOS)

$
0
0
This is a photo essay I shot on March 20, 2014 on Jacob Hashimoto's installation at MOCA Pacific Design Center as part of my continuing survey of important works in the Southern California art world. (More on my N(Art)rative Series below.)

From the MOCA Press Release: Jacob Hashimoto (b. 1973, Greeley, Colorado), is an artist whose work studies visual experience in space, artifice, and craft through the use of materials such as handmade kites, fiberglass, marble and the skillful use of light. Combining traditional kite-making techniques and painting into sculptural environments, Hashimoto creates massive space-altering installations with thousands of thin paper sheets. For MOCA Pacific Design Center, Hashimoto is producing the third and final edition of Gas Giant. The work was previously presented in Venice, Italy in 2013 Fondazione Querini Stampalia by Studio la Citta and in Chicago in 2012 at Rhona Hoffman Gallery. This exhibition will be the first L.A. presentation of Gas Giant and will mark Hashimoto's first solo museum exhibition in California. Jacob Hashimoto's Gas Giant is organized by MOCA Senior Curator Alma Ruiz and Curatorial Assistant Selene Preciado.

Jacob Hashimoto's Gas Giant is made possible by the generous endowment support from The Nimoy Fund for New and Emerging Artists. Support also provided by Shoshana and Wayne Blank, Martha Otero, and Paula and Allan Rudnick. Additional support provided by Judith and Alexander Angerman, Susan Eileen Picket and Robert A. Johnson, and Jane Siegal. Generous support for MOCA Pacific Design Center is provided by Charles S. Cohen. In-kind support is provided by Omni Los Angeles Hotel. In-kind media support is provided by KCRW 89.9 FM

2014-03-21-1.jpg


The entrance to MOCA Pacific Design Center. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8260.jpg


The first floor view. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8269.jpg


The first floor view. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8272.jpg


The first floor view looking up. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8377.jpg


First floor detail. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8378.jpg


First floor detail. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8278.jpg


The first floor from the stairs. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8283.jpg


On the stairs looking towards the second floor. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8287.jpg


Second floor view. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8303.jpg


The second floor looking up. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8306.jpg


The second floor looking up. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8310.jpg


The second floor looking up. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8312.jpg


The second floor looking up. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8325.jpg


Second floor view. Photo by EMS.

2014-03-21-2B2A8333.jpg


Second floor view. Photo by EMS.

(This article is part of an ongoing photojournalism survey of art exhibition openings in SoCal titled EMS N(art)rative. Through my lens I document a photographic essay or visual "N(art)rative" that captures the happenings, personalities, collectors, gallerists, artists, and the art itself; all elements that form the richly varied and textured fabric of the SoCal art world. This reconnaissance offers a unique view for serious art world players to obtain news and information on the current pulse of what's in the now, yet capturing timeless indelible images for posterity and legacy. Here is EMS N(art)rative Four.)

Making the Most of Jazz Fest

$
0
0
Jazz Fest 2014 has recently announced the 2014 lineup. Rest assured, the well-rounded New Orleans Jazz Heritage Society has programmed something for everyone.

Headliners include Bruce Springsteen, Chaka Kahn, Branford Marsalis, Phish, Eric Clapton, Santana and Aaron Neville. Dozens of additional nationally known and local New Orleans acts will perform over two long weekends starting April 25.

So much more than a music festival, Jazz Fest is a celebration of the Bayou, of native cultures, customs, food and dress. The festival -- technically the New Orleans Jazz and Heritage festival -- is a deeply rooted Louisiana cultural event. All ages are invited.

Whether your passion is for the blues, gospel, country, pop, classic, acid or fusion jazz, you will find acts to love at Jazz fest. Buying tickets online allows you to design and plan a festival line-up but... allow for spontaneity!

Parades will stop you in your tracks; a compelling voice will call to you from a tent you had not planned on visiting. Let the spirit move you! Diehard jazz fans that could have camped out in the Jazz tent for the entire weekend, we were surprised and inspired at the country stage and gospel tent. Jazz Fest is a goldmine -- an opportunity to listen to and discover music that you thought you knew!

Tip: While standing on a food or music line, while in the venues and walking around, chat it up with fellow festival-goers. Jazz Fest is a great chance to meet fellow music lovers, learn about local area favorites and also get tips on good bands. The festival draws tourists from around the globe. I encountered travelers from England, Japan and all over the U.S. Friendly people will let you in on their local secrets and favorite clubs in their cities too!

Tip: Be prepared for large crowds at some venues. The Acura stage, where the top headliners perform, is an open area accommodating thousands. If you don't arrive at the stage early, you will be watching the show on the Jumbotron from quite a distance and the sound does not travel well to the further reaches of the field.

Transportation tips:

Bikes vs. bus vs. taxi: Bikes are easy to rent and New Orleans is a relatively flat city. Many festival-goers eschew vehicles for the pleasure biking.

Jazz Fest Shuttle: If you are staying in town, anywhere near the French Quarter or downtown, you can buy tickets for the Jazz Fest Shuttle, the coach bus that takes you to the fairgrounds. No hassle with parking, you step off the bus right to the fairgrounds.

The bus costs about $18/day r/t.

Jazz Fest Express/Shuttle offers continuous round-trip service to the Fair Grounds Race Course from 10:30 am to 7:30 pm. A special entrance is available to the Jazz Fest Express buses to avoid traffic. Buses depart from many locations.

Tip: Be prepared to queue up in a long line to get back downtown. The line moves but not as quickly as in the morning.

Weather tip:

Heat -- probably and most likely the sun will be strong. Many venues are tented -- Jazz, Gospel, Blues -- but many stages are open air. Hat, sunscreen a must.

Rain? Not usual in April or May, but with the recent erratic weather patterns, be prepared. Consider waterproof shoes or rubber boots.

Comfort Tip:

Bring a chair! A light folding chair that can easily tote around on your back can be set up in front of the smaller stages or outside some of the larger stages like Blues and Jazz.

To VIP or not to VIP:

Three levels of VIP passes are available with costs ranging from $550 for exclusive viewing of the Acura stage to $1,100 with a myriad of complimentary services and perks.

Food tips:

Jazz Fest Food is fabulous, plentiful and features local cuisine. Shrimp, oysters, crawfish and vegetarian options are available at many locations around the fairgrounds. Specialties include:
Creole-stuffed bread, pecan catfish Meniere, fried eggplant with crawfish sauce, smothered pork chops with greens and cornbread, alligator sauce piquant, shrimp and sausage macaque choux, and the unmistakable pheasant, quail and Andouille gumbo.

Jazz Fest Crafts:

Make some time to visit the juried arts fair. You will find one of kind clothing, glass art, wood pieces, paintings and watercolors and more, all created by local artists.

Up all night?

Maximize! A friend organizes her trip to see the bands she wants and buying tickets for the ones she can't (if two bands are at the same time) that are often playing in town in the evening.

Local Eatery Favorites:

In town: Fat Hen Grocery, Root, Dick & Jenny's, Acme Oyster House, Grand Isle Restaurant.

Women at the Armory

$
0
0
A sampling of international female artists at the New York Armory Show.

Bahia Shehab: Art As a Tool for Change

$
0
0



"Graffiti is like flowers. They are beautiful, but they don't live long." An interview with Lebanese-Egyptian street-artist Bahia Shehab about the role of art during the Arab spring: "You cannot resist ideas. They can travel into any mind."

"I am a quiet person, I don't know how to scream", says Bahia Shehab. "My contribution to the revolution was to paint on the walls, was to be an artist." During the Arab spring many artists felt the urge to rush to the streets, Shehab explains. At the time, there was no tomorrow, one did not think of possible repercussions, she says: "When you loose hope with everything around you, you go down to the street. Your only hope is the people. This is who you paint and work for. It's their minds, you try to influence."

At the time Bahia became known for a series of graffiti centered around the word 'no' -- no to military rule, no to emergency law, no to stripping the people, no to blinding heroes, no to burning books, no to violence, no to stealing the revolution, no to a new pharaoh besides others.

"Our work gets erased very quickly on the street. That's why TV and the internet are very useful tools -- you can communicate your messages in the digital sphere. That's the game-changer now. The government can resist you, it can try to hide, what you try to communicate, but it's a completely different ballgame now."

"I believe, that art can change lives", Bahia Shehab continues: "It's a very powerful tool. It's a therapy. In some civilizations art is used to cure you from a disease." Art can be perceived by anybody on different levels. The more art there is in the public sphere, the better the society around it.

"In our case, we are not trying to install beauty. We have not yet reached that level. We communicate ideas of change to society. Because we believe in change and we believe in art as a tool for change. We are still on survival mode."

"It takes time to create change. New ideas are always opposed. Humans like normality, we like our comfort-zone. they don't like change, that is drastic. But enlightenment is not selective. Some people keep dreaming. Dreaming of a better future. We hope to grow the circle of dreamers. Society is not driven by people, that are pragmatic and realistic. It's only driven by the crazy ones, the dreamers."

Bahia Shehab (b.1977) is an artist, designer and Islamic art historian studying ancient Arabic script and visual heritage. Shehab is a Creative Director with MI7-Cairo working on projects relevant to cultural heritage and she is also associate professor of professional practice at The American University in Cairo. She has developed and launched the new graphic design program for the Department of the Arts with courses mainly focused on the visual culture of the Arab world. She is currently a PhD candidate at Leiden University in Holland. Her research is on Fatimid Kufic inscriptions on portable items in the Mediterranean basin and beyond.


Bahia Shehab was interviewed by Marc-Christoph Wagner
Filmed by Steen Møller Rasmussen
Edited by Kamilla Bruus
Produced by Marc-Christoph Wagner
Copyright: Louisiana Channel, Louisiana Museum of Modern Art, 2014

A Conversation With Scott Rogers

$
0
0
"Your dad makes shoes, you go into the shoe business. Your dad makes shows, you go into show business." -- Scott Rogers

Scott Rogers was born into a family in the entertainment industry. An industry he saw from many perspectives growing up and one he couldn't help but become involved in. After all his family was in it, he was surrounded by it, moved by it and knew he had to be in it. Against his father's wishes he quit college to embark on his adventure. Something he is admittedly not proud of.

His first job he worked for free, learning the intricacies behind the scenes. In the beginning he thought he wanted to be an actor, but while working in props and learning all facets of the business including lighting and sound, he became a keen observer and was determined to get into stage management. His passion sealed, he landed the first and most important job of his career. His stepping stone. After that, directing would soon be on the horizon.

Stage management required him on the road, a nomad. Traveling the circuit gave him the chance to prove he was capable. To himself and his father. He was pocketing $750/week (at the time the money was really good) on the adventure of his young life. Nothing could stop him. Almost nothing. A stage manager, and anyone else involved in the production of a show knew, once the run was over the money stopped. Then you began again.

When asked about his successes, what he was most proud of, the worst review of his career came up.... "The one most people would not mention", Rogers said. His first major effort as a director was a project with the star of Knots Landing, Donna Mills. She had been cast first because of her star power which always helped a show's success and because she had performed theatre in the past. What Rogers didn't know was the actress, his lead, had done theatre, but not as an actress, as a dancer. The play was known to be difficult, even for the most seasoned actor.

ES LIAISONS DANGEREUES, which later became Dangerous Liaisons, would be the unenviable "feather in his cap". It was a difficult project. He had an unqualified lead actress and it was his first important work. The long hours, toil, and hard work were rewarded, although not as he had hoped. He garnered the much needed publicity, but in the worst way. He received the worst review of his life from one of the most important papers in entertainment. The Los Angeles Times said, in his words, " The plotting direction basically sucked". He was publicly trashed, humiliated. His life was over... and he survived. He lived to do it another day. So many give up after such a magnificent failure.

" No matter how bad things seem, if you simply persevere. The setbacks put your future successes in perspective."

Just a year later he received the best reviews of his life and many accolades, for his work on "Prelude to a Kiss". This from the very same people at the Los Angeles Times.

Failure and learning from it in a painful public way makes you resilient enough to press on and continue to create, evolve and innovate. The key ingredient to making it. Rogers had it.

His coaching took off after directing extensively he was asked to coach an actress for a role in the 90210 spin-off, Melrose Place. He got her through the network audition and he never heard from her again. When he inquired about her to a friend close to the show he learned she didn't make the cut later on. He did realize he had a knack for coaching actors and the one's who stuck with him on their way up realized it as well.

He is methodical in his approach to critiquing and helping others learn. His honesty, no nonsense approach and pure logic are his most valuable assets in the space as well as the business world he operates in. The fact that he has helped so many individuals move forward in their careers and perfect craft is a testament to his abilities.

About Scott Rogers:
Scott served as Acting Coach for 20th Century Fox Studios under a 3-year, exclusive contract, coaching actors for film and television projects. Scott is a 30+ year member of Actors Equity Association, AFTRA and the Screen Actors Guild (now SAG-AFTRA), where he sits on the SAG-AFTRA National Board of Directors and serves as Co-Chair of the SAG-AFTRA National Conservatory Committee (charged with providing support for the training of professional actors across the country. He recently served as Acting Coach on the feature film "Princess Ka`iulani" starring Barry Pepper, Will Patton, and Q'orianka Kilcher. Scott's been hired by actors, studios, and production companies to Coach/Produce/Direct hundreds of actors, including: Donna Mills (Knotts Landing), Sharon Lawrence (NYPD Blue), Steve Allen, Jayne Meadows, Pat Morita (Karate Kid), Brooke Burns (Dog Eat Dog), Dominic Purcell (Prison Break), Charles Grodin, Catherine Oxenberg and many others. You can learn more at www.scottrogersstudios.com .

Harmony -- At Last

$
0
0
It's only taken 17 years for me to get the chance to see Harmony again. That's the Barry Manilow-Bruce Sussman musical that had its world premiere at the La Jolla Playhouse in San Diego, which I've been writing about, oh, more than occasionally... It's the story of the real-life Comedian Harmonists, a wildly popular mix-religion "close Harmony" group from Germany in the late 1920s until the mid-1930s when events overpowered them, as the Nazis came to power.

The show ran into development hell with producers for a very long time, but finally got revived late last year at Atlanta's Alliance Theatre, and now is being done in Los Angeles at the Ahmanson Theatre, with the Center Theatre Music Group. It got glowing raves in Atlanta, though mixed reviews in L.A. With all due respect to the critics here, while I understand their criticisms, I largely disagree with most of them.

The show is extremely good. It's flawed, but the issues are in the details and not the appeal of the production. It's a rich, interesting, thoughtful, tuneful, dark, funny show that misses on a few cylinders, but ultimately and overall is quite entertaining. I admire it, too, for what it's attempting to undertake, and that it largely succeeds at it.

It's important to note, too, that unless you're talking about the 15-20 Greatest Broadway Musicals of All Time, pretty much all shows are flawed in one way or another. And Harmony isn't actually even a Broadway musical yet -- it's only had three tryout productions. (Two, really, since this in L.A. is largely the same co-production as that in Atlanta.) That's no excuse, nor no reason not to criticize -- in fact, this is the very time when criticism does the creators the most good -- but perspective has to be kept. When Camelot was out of town, for instance, the first production ran about 4-1/2 hours. A Funny Thing Happened On the Way to the Forum was a bit unfocused and not working well with baffled audiences, until Stephen Sondheim wrote "Comedy Tonight" out of town in Washington, D.C., to open the show. One of the most famous telegrams in theater history came from out-of-town when Michael Todd wrote about a show in tryouts, "No Girls No Tunes No Chance." The show was Oklahoma! They fixed things. It did just fine.

Again, this isn't to overlook the shows flaws, only to put them in context. Harmony, as it stands right now, is a very good show that works well. It needs some more work, for my taste, but it's fine-tuning that it needs, not an overhaul of a problematic production. I don't think this is just my opinion -- the packed audience gave it a rousing response throughout. That doesn't make them, or me, right. But this isn't a piece of fluffery that's able to razzle-dazzle an unthinking public with light-hearted joviality -- it's a serious, moody, thoughtful story that has a bleak plot development, and a heartbreaking, albeit moving and satisfying ending. This is hardly the stuff used to blind an audience with glitzy tinsel and distracting fireworks), and the audience was involved to the very end, cheering at the curtain call.

2014-03-25-AHarmonyPhoto11.jpg

Photo credit: Craig Schwartz


Clearly, it's the Manilow-Sussman score that attracts most people's interests. And it's very good. Not just musically, creating a sense of period and location, but the lyrics are smart, flowing, and effective. And sometimes quite funny. I didn't find them to necessarily leap out, but they fit the music, characters and plot very well. This isn't a Barry Manilow Score. (I don't mean that pejoratively, but descriptively.) It's a score than fits the show and its locale. If you're listening to hear -- "Oh, yeah, there, that's Manilow" -- yes, you'll hear it in places. Just like you'll hear Richard Rodgers in all his shows. But for much of it, I suspect most people, if they weren't told who wrote it, wouldn't have a clue. And would be seriously impressed.

Yes, there are a couple of beautiful, soaring "Manilow" ballads -- and whose lyrics do leap out -- most notably the break-out "Every Single Day" (which Manilow now performs in his concerts) and "In This World" (a -- literally -- heart-breaking song near the end that is problematic in the story for the character singing it) but even those fits the show, and ultimately most of the score is focused on character and moving the plot. Often quite cleverly.

For instance, "This is Our Time" (pictured above) actually has three different meanings to the characters singing their own version -- the group itself; one of the women, Ruth, protesting the growing fascism; and two of the characters in their budding romance; These three separate scenes end up blending and overlapping one another and turn into a joint number. The song, "Where You Go," is a moving duet, but not a traditional sort. It's song by the two wives to their husbands, each with completely opposite lyrics, all within the same scene, as we move back-and-forth between two bedrooms.

The title song is very lively and serves a particular plot function quite effectively -- it's used as a montage that starts the group out when first meeting, through rehearsals in the alleys and train stations, and then finally when they become a polished act. It also serves as a leit motif recurring through the show. Several reviewers found the song to be endless, but they miss the point of it. Not just in function, but in substance. It's what the show is about. Besides which, it's a terrific song.

There's also a very tricky aspect to a score like this, when trying to incorporate songs from a musical act show-within-the-show. If not handled well, these non-plot songs can stop the evening cold. Harmony needs such songs, to demonstrate the group in action, but handles them very well. Several have a subtext to the plot going on around them -- like "Come to the Fatherland," performed with the Harmonists as controlled marionettes on strings, singing about the delights of the Third Reich. The result is very funny on the surface and quite uncomfortable and profoundly sad underneath. And then there are a couple numbers from their act that are simply so hilariously staged that they can't help but demonstrate how the group got to be so popular, notably "How Can We Serve You, Madame?" (full of double-entendres, sung by elegant waiters who end up in their skivvies) and the virtuosic "Hungarian Rhapsody #20" -- much in the style of what the real Comedian Harmonists often did, create the sound of an orchestra vocally, in this case a parody of Franz Liszt's 19 other rhapsodies.

I must almost mention the "11 o'clock" number, a powerful song called "Threnody," sung by the character of Josef (nicknamed 'Rabbi," since he had once been...well, a rabbi) who periodically steps out of the show to narrate it as the last surviving member. In "Threnody" he faces a situation tormenting to him, whether it was his mere fate, tragic doom or blessing to remember all that happened to them. Though the singer, Shayne Kennon, also gets to sing the big hit, "Every Single Day," it's the roaring reaction of the audience here that is even greater.

The cast was very good, at times wonderful, and each get their moments, though no one really leaped out to me as standalone special, which is fine, since it's about a group, though Kennon has the most to do, narrating it as he does -- and he does well. The others Harmonists (who, to be clear, each do come across individually) are Matt Bailey, Will Blum, Chris Dwan, Will Taylor, and Douglas Williams) And the two leading women are played by Hannah Corneau (the aforementioned Ruth, a composite of a few women) and Leigh Ann Larkin (the real-life Mary).

I would have loved to have seen a bit more conflict between the group, but it's there and very hard to miss (though a few critics did). But perhaps this is one of the times when having a scene be more direct rather than suggestive or hinting would work to the show's advantage. I wasn't particularly bothered that none of the characters change all that greatly over time -- in part because when you're in a group, people tend to create a wall to protect their place in it -- but perhaps a little more change would flesh things out a touch. But ultimately, it's the group that changes, more so than the individuals, as it's forced to react to the crushing conditions around them.

My biggest character quibble is that I found the character of Ruth a bit too loud and strident. Whether that's as written or performance, I don't know. In fairness, if any character has the right to be unrelentingly strident, it's Ruth -- a Jewish woman trying to reform Germany in the midst of growing Naziism. Indeed, Hannah Corneau has a great moment after a concert which has been interrupted by Brown Shirts, and a Nazi colonel fan and his wife come backstage afterwards for autographs.

My sense from having seen the show 17 years ago is that the opening was more drawn out in that original incarnation, as we learn more about the members and their development. I could be wrong about that, but if so it would work well doing so here. But having said that, much as it might help, there's something to be said for the vibrancy here of doing it all as the one, long, "Harmony" montage that carries you away with enthusiasm.

Overall, I liked the direction by Tony Speciale, particularly in the larger production pieces. There were places where things do get a little static, mainly in the more dramatic moments, but it didn't cause my interest to waver. The ending is changed slightly from that initial production, and for the better. Then, as I recall, it was split between reminiscences between 'Rabbi' and Mary, who had been his wife. Here, it's more focused with just 'Rabbi.' That adds power to the climax, though it gets a bit talky.

What I most admire about the end is that Sussman and Manilow didn't try to give it a spin to make things happy. The end isn't happy. But the authors make it so that things aren't tragic for the group -- rather, what they come up with is substantive and effectively moving and satisfying, concluding with the lovely, "Stars in the Night." Oddly, the real -- further -- ending is more upbeat than the show. The Comedian Harmonists weren't as forgotten as the characters feel. There was a successful 4-hour TV documentary about them in Germany in 1975 (when all but one of the group were still alive). A very good award-winning film, The Harmonists, was released in 1997, which was named Outstanding Feature Film at the German Film Awards. The group even won an Echo Award in 1998 from the country's record academy, Deutsche Phonoakademie -- Germany's version of the Grammys. And now this musical. So the Comedian Harmonists are far from forgotten in their home.

I'm not sure what the future for Harmony holds, or what the plans are by the creators and producers. What occurred to me afterwards is that while Broadway or touring might be among their thoughts -- it would make a terrific production in Germany. I say that not just because that's where the Comedian Harmonists are best known, but there actually is a fairly solid stage musical foundation there, largely through a group called Stage Entertainment, which is even becoming a growing place for out of town Broadway tryouts. The musical version of Rocky which just opened on Broadway to actually-good reviews began life in Hamburg. A lush musical based on Rebecca was set to open on Broadway, after having begun production in Stuttgart, before infamously becoming embroiled in a bizarre producer/money meltdown. When Tarzan left Broadway after only a very modest run, it gained new life in Germany when the show was tweaked and re-staged. I also wrote here (several times, in fact) about the very entertaining musical Hinterm Horizont that I saw in Berlin, produced as well by Stage Entertainment.

So...who knows what the future life is of Harmony. Both Manilow and Sussman say they're not looking ahead and are just thrilled to focus on these two new productions in Atlanta and L.A. that brought Harmony back to well-deserved life. It runs at the Ahmanson through April 21, 2014.

There's more work they can do on it. But what they have already, in these early stages, is a wonderful evening in the theater.

If you'd like to hear much of the score -- I can't embed it, but here are long excerpts that play back-to-back in this Soundcloud.com music player. Each song selection is about a minute-and-a-half. Just let it keep running when a song finishes, and the next will start up.

*


To read more from Robert J. Elisberg about this or many other matters both large and tidbit small, see Elisberg Industries.

The Humanizing Element

$
0
0
Sir Ken Robinson said the following on feeling and knowing:

Feeling and knowing are part of the same complex of a whole being. Our feelings are a form of perception. And they are affected by what we think. By our frameworks of ideas. They are affected by how well we can express ourselves and the languages we have available to do that. So part of the task of education is to connect ourselves with ourselves. And I think the reason so many people get depressed and lost is they have lost the connection with themselves.


The role of artists in making new connections, widening our imagination, relaxing and opening our minds, speaking to our feelings, triggering our senses, filling us with joy, making us feel our unresolved pains, giving us comfort, shedding light on injustice, being critical, making us see the world through the eyes of someone else, giving us a mirror of our behavior and so much more, cannot be emphasized too much.

In the United States of America, there's an Arts Advocacy Day every year, where supporters of the arts let their voices be heard to politicians and more importantly to the public at large. One of the highlights of this day is the Nancy Hanks Lecture, where every year a prominent speaker stands up for the arts with a passionate speech. Often held by artists themselves who do their best to convey in words the essence of the miracle we call "arts and culture." This year, on March 24, the Nancy Hanks lecture was given by New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd. I am very grateful for those people who keep vocalizing the importance of arts and culture.

One of my favorite movies is Les Petits Mouchoirs. In general, the film is about relationships between friends, and how a few hard issues between them have never been discussed. It's about how emotions and frustrations that have evolved over many years have never been dealt with. At their annual group vacation, all these bottled up feelings and emotions come out, which creates tension and distance between the friends. At that precise moment in the movie an artist, in real-life singer Maxim Nucci, arrives at the vacation house of the friends and is asked by them to stay for dinner. The artist accepts the offer and after diner he gets his guitar and plays a song for the troubled group of friends. How often do you talk to your family and friends about things that are important to you, and the things that bother you or keep you awake? How often do friends and family share their innermost feelings with you?

We are talking about the universal power of relationships and why we need to take care of them. There is a new nonprofit organization called Relationships First which has made their main focus making relationships better. The organization consists of therapists, relationship experts, best-selling authors, social entrepreneurs and, mind you, artists. One of the members of the Board of Directors is singer and songwriter Alanis Morisette. One of her songs is called "Underneath," part of the text goes like this:

"There is no difference in what we're doing in here  
That doesn't show up as bigger symptoms out there"

The School of Life is a school founded by philosopher Alain De Botton. According to De Botton, the humanities should help us to live. The School of Life is devoted to developing emotional intelligence through the help of culture. They address such issues as how to find fulfilling work, how to master the art of relationships, how to understand one's past, how to achieve calm and how better to understand and, where necessary change, the world. The School of Life gives Secular Sermons on Sunday, which I love to watch, and can be found on their YouTube channel. If you are unfamiliar with Sunday Sermons of The School of Life, I would suggest you start with a lecture by its founder Alain De Botton on "Art as Therapy."

Richard J. Davidson, PhD is a renowned neuroscientist and founder of the Center For Investigating Healthy Minds. He claims that kindness can best be regarded as a skill. This means that if like me you're not always as friendly as you could be, you can train yourself and learn to become better at that, to be kinder both for yourself and your surroundings. For adults, the positive results and effects of mindfulness or meditation are clear and based on hard scientific proof according to Davidson. The Center for Investigating Healthy Minds is now examining if mindfulness and other constructive mental tools can also be taught to children and if they have a long lasting effect on children. To give you an idea of what mindfulness for children in the classroom might look like, I recommend the following documentary called "Healthy Habits of Mind."

What these three organizations, Relationships First, The School of Life and The Center For Investigating Healthy Minds have in common is they want to give us practical tools that enable us to create more healthy and happy lives for ourselves.

Paul Ekman, psychologist, says that problem of our time is to achieve a global compassion or otherwise run the risk that we will destroy ourselves. Ekman has worked with agencies such as the FBI, the CIA and local police forces. He's a man who can speak out of "hands-on" experience. Ekman and the Dalai Lama are co-authors of a (coming) book called "Moving Towards Global Compassion."

Nelson Mandela concluded his Nobel Peace Prize speech in 1993 with:

Let the strivings of us all, prove Martin Luther King Jr. to have been correct, when he said that humanity can no longer be tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war. Let the efforts of us all, prove that he was not a mere dreamer when he spoke of the beauty of genuine brotherhood and peace being more precious than diamonds or silver or gold.
Let a new age be born.

Say It Loud: I'm Gay and I'm proud? Not in 1970s Philadelphia. Enter Doctor Anonymous: Part 1 of 3

$
0
0
There's no need for masks and conversion therapy. The playwright, director and lead actor all weigh in.

Part one is with the playwright, Guy Glass.


2014-03-25-DRAPARTONEPIC2.jpg


Although a work of fiction, Doctor Anonymous was inspired by a watershed moment in LGBT history when Doctor John E. Fryer, wearing a mask and using a voice-distorting microphone, declared himself a homosexual in front of the 1972 convention of the American Psychiatric Association, leading to the decision to de-list homosexuality as a mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It took another 40 years for California to become the first state to ban gay conversion therapy in 2012. Today, as other states debate similar measures, and despite the support of the APA, efforts to change sexual orientation continue to be practiced in the U.S. and abroad.

Guy Fredrick Glass is a playwright who is also a psychiatrist with more than 20 years of clinical experience treating LGBT patients in New York City. His play, The Last Castrato, was produced at New York's Connelly Theatre. His short plays Healing and TheTherapeutic Hour were published by Smith and Kraus in two anthologies. He is currently enrolled in the MFA program in playwriting at Stony Brook Southampton. A graduate of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Doctor Glass maintained a gay-affirmative psychotherapy practice for more than two decades in Manhattan. He served on the executive board of the Association of Gay and Lesbian Psychiatrists, and is affiliated with Beth Israel Medical Center in New York and Pennsylvania Hospital in Philadelphia.


2014-03-25-GuyFrederickGlass.jpg


Robert Gagnier: Hello, Guy. Doctor Anonymous is set in 1972 in Philadelphia, against the background of the mayoral campaign of Frank Rizzo, the city's Chief of Police who led many of the Saturday night "roundups" of homosexuals. What is your connection to that place and time?

Guy Glass: I grew up in the suburbs of Philadelphia, so it is a place that has a lot of meaning for me. The play was inspired by a real incident involving a gay psychiatrist, John Fryer, who lived in Philadelphia. He was the real Doctor Anonymous who outed himself at a convention.

RG: You are both a playwright and a psychiatrist with more than 20 plus years of clinical experience treating LGBT patients in New York. Your practice is described as being gay affirmative psychotherapy. Do you see patients whose lifestyle is straight?

GG: Absolutely. About half of my patients are gay, and about half are straight. I don't discriminate!

RG: You mentioned that you can recall a point in time where it was difficult for two men to walk down a street to hold hands and or to express their feelings toward one another, and that there remains that minority who see being gay as a being a choice based on environment. Does Doctor Anonymous address these old notions?


2014-03-25-DRAPARTONEPIC1.jpg


GG: One of the issues in the play deals with gay conversion therapy. For people who think that is something of the past (it was banned by law in California), it is still in fact practiced today in some places. I just saw an article this past week about someone going through conversion therapy in China. And of course we know what is happening in places such as Uganda and Nigeria with homosexuals. We can't forget that even though this is Los Angeles, things are still very different for people in other communities around the world.

RG: At what point in your career as a psychiatrist did you decide to take on the duties of a playwright?

GG: I have made a career out of listening to other people tell their stories. About 10 years ago, I decided that I would tell my own stories. I am very good listener and have a good ear for dialogue. It evolved gradually that I began to express myself and let other people hear me, as opposed to me just listening to them.

Headshot of Guy Glass courtesy of Gap In The Wall Prods.

Is Opera Dead? Is the Met Next?

$
0
0
San Diego Opera will close its doors this year; an era is ending whether I want to admit it or not. I performed there many times and always had an extraordinarily collaborative experience. It felt like my home company.

Reality The audience that can afford to pay $280 for an opening night ticket is a microscopic percentage of this planet's population. Ticket prices on Broadway are high too. But a family comes to NYC to have a spectacular night out. There isn't that same attitude about opera. Even as a leading lady, I couldn't afford to buy the tickets and attend the art form my participation helped make so beautiful. What is wrong with that picture?

Costs I'm enormously sad, but I must ask the obvious question: Is opera dead? With each production costing millions and the head stagehands in NY making over $464,000 per year, is the cost of doing business strangling the art form? Is the venerable New York Metropolitan Opera next to close its doors?

Contemporary Opera I learned about opera from my beloved Italian grandmother. Her experience of opera had nothing to do with galas, stars, red carpets, glittering jewels or designer gowns. Her opera (written by her contemporaries!) reeked of sweat, garlic, passion and earthy reality that appealed to the society it served.

The earliest operas written by commissioned artists to entertain kings were vehicles for stars like the castrato, Farinelli, and spoke of elevated themes of love, death, pride and the gods. Then verismo walked in. That was the opera my grandmother knew. It was all about blood, guts, sex, murder and revenge (vendetta, tremenda vendetta). It described my crazy family perfectly. It was the New York Daily News set to exquisite music.

Patrons Throughout history, the higher levels of society whose basic needs were taken care of, supported the arts. Lee A. Olsen helped me escape my plebeian bonds to pursue opera and live and study in Milan. She supported my beginning artistic efforts for years. When she died in 1992, I lost not only a mentor, but a friend and confidant. Opera lost a passionate supporter. She truly loved artists and the art form. San Diego Opera's patrons have supported their opera company steadfastly for 49 years.

Olympic Athletes Since I began my career in the late '70s audiences have changed enormously. Opera, which literally means work, takes years to master. We are Olympic athletes and the Olympians are dying. The games are fraught with political maneuvering and art is a social barometer. The Olympians and the opera singers, the medalists in the highest rung, have a brief, spectacular reign. To learn the eye movements of Chinese opera it takes 10 years, it takes at least that long to master an exquisitely controlled messa di voce. Does anyone care?

Technology While technology has proliferated and made our small planet a net of virtual interactivity, it has also diminished our actual connectivity. How many times have you sat in a restaurant and seen two people screen sucking instead of talking, or even more astounding, listening to each other? Our attention spans don't allow a three-hour opera to unfold. Art and music is an acquired taste: acquired only after food and shelter has been taken care of. We drew on the walls of our caves by firelight. What will we draw on the walls of our cocoons when we withdraw into the safety of our homes guarded by security systems and touch our world only through cyberspace? Are we losing the ability to truly interact with others? That interaction is what makes a night in the theater magical.

Have we discovered our Olympians are only human? Have we supplanted them with the god of technology who allows us to interact, but not too much? Have we retreated to where we have safety in snark and bullying and can tweet our twerks. There is an app for that. Do you think it would make a difference to attendance if we hired Miley in her plastic costume, for Liu in Turandot?

Passion and Garlic The opera my grandmother taught me arrived in a little cart to the village of Pentone, Calabria. A meal was had, a makeshift set was set up and tired players and musicians, aflame with passion, sang their hearts out and passed the hat. People no longer come together at the arrival of the troubadours.

Struggling everyday people don't go out for entertainment -- they go in. They go into their Wiis, their games and giant screen TVs. Theater? Opera? Symphony concerts? Why?

My students What do I tell my young students at the university who are spending thousands of dollars pursuing the chimera of opera? I tell them to have a Plan B. I tell them the venues are closing. Of course, I'm not teaching at Juilliard, I'm teaching at a poor university where most of the students are the first in their family to pursue higher education. Their priority is survival, not art. Where do they fit in this dying of the light?

Jobs Lost Where do the fabulous orchestral musicians, composers, magnificent singers, stage crews, makeup artists, costumers, lighting designers, set designers and directors fit? Is art and artistry still alive and thriving? Or is my view obscured by looking at my beloved art form through the lens of the have-nots?

I wouldn't call New Zealanders a musically sophisticated audience but they started out with six performances of Carmen in the '93 season of Auckland Opera and had to add four more performances. The audience demanded it. The company went from being in the red to solvent with 10 sold out houses and SRO ticket sales. Their marketing was superb (Gabriel you were a wizard) their budget was minuscule and they knew how to sell their product.

Crowdfunding Can we save opera with crowdfunding? Is there anyone out there who wants to save it? I've been out of opera's performance circle for over a decade. I ask you, my colleagues who are still performing and the companies I have worked with around the world and the younger generation of singers -- what can we do?

Can someone, anyone, give me some hope that the art form I spent 40 years of my life refining and performing isn't on its last legs? Can it still draw breath and is there an elixir (d'Amore?) to revive it?

Or is it requiem aeternam?

Adria Firestone
You Are the Artist of Your Life
Performance Career Blueprint

The Range Wolf Is Andrew J. Fenady's Fresh Take on the Classic Jack London The Sea Wolf Saga

$
0
0
Jaunty Andrew J. Fenady, the award-winning writer/producer of dozens of TV shows and movies, including The Man with Bogart's Face (1980) and Chisum (1970) with John Wayne, has a rousing new novel being released on April 1 by Kensington books. The Range Wolf, which is Owen Wister and Edgar award winning Fenady's 11th Western novel, takes the classic Jack London 1904 novel, The Sea Wolf, and inspirationally transports it to the post-Civil War West.

2014-03-24-THE_RANGE_WOLF_COVER_cropped.jpg



The Range Wolf follows the story of tyrannical, Nietzschean-quoting, self-made man Wolf Riker (Larsen in London's novel) and dilettante Christopher Guthrie (Van Weyden in The Sea Wolf). In Fenady's richly updated story, their paths cross during a stagecoach hold-up and then merge on a brutal cattle drive to Kansas, where you either "change" or "die." Fenady says his story has a surprise ending that's never been used before. "I feel it's a much more satisfying finale to the saga."

2014-03-24-AJ_FENADY_PHOTO.jpg

Andrew J. Fenady worked with John Wayne back in the day



Fenady, who has won the Golden Boot award (1995) for his storytelling contributions to the Western genre and can spin yarns till the steers mosey on home, suggests that Westerns are our form of mythology: "Star Wars was a Western. Instead of stagecoaches, they had spaceships. You can take almost any plot and turn it into a Western. For me, I thought, we have two of the most vital and challenging characters in the history of literature, so why use them just at sea. Take this dilettante from the east and go west to find out what it's really like. But surprise, surprise, it's nothing like he thought."

Guthrie meets Wolf, this brute of a man, who's also an intellectual but whose raison d'etre is summed up in the John Milton line he also espouses, "Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heaven." And then Guthrie has no choice but to become part of the cattle drive where he also falls in love with a beautiful woman.

From silent versions to Edward G. Robinson's take as Wolf Larsen in the 1942 classic movie, there have been several takes on London's great novel. In fact, Fenady, himself, produced his own cinematic version, The Sea Wolf, starring Charles Bronson as the nautical Wolf in 1993.

But what Fenady also does differently in his new novel is to delve further into the heretofore mostly unexplained relationship between Wolf and his equally charismatic brother Dirk. Fenady explains, "It was never really explained in the book or any movie version. Now Wolf has sent his kid brother to college, then the two came out West with money Wolf had saved and they built a huge ranch together. But things split them apart -- one had sympathy for the North, the other for the South in the Civil War -- and then they both fell in love with the same woman. Now Dirk becomes another vital character, and you've got major conflict and the reason why one brother wants to kill the other."

One excerpt also sets up Riker's thrilling two-step with Guthrie:

But we'll see how -- and if -- you survive on this drive. I'll be interested in the change.

In me?

Ah yes. There will be a change, there has to be. Even as there was a change between my brother and me, a man who might go to any length to see this drive fail. To kill me if it comes to that, just as I'll kill him if that time comes.

Wolf Riker seemed to stagger slightly in sudden pain. His thick fingers now rubbed at the scar on his forehead as if trying to squeeze out the pain. I did my best to ignore what was occurring.

Guth.

Yes, Mister Riker.

You'll change...or you'll die.


Fenady grew up watching his heroes like Gary Cooper and John Wayne at movie matinees in Toledo, Ohio. He even rode around on a broomstick he called "Tony" named after the horse of Hollywood's first Western megastar Tom Mix. When he made his own move west to Los Angeles, he fell in love with the big skies, ranches and farms, and the Pacific. By 1969, after he'd established himself in Hollywood as a successful TV and movie writer and producer of such hit series as The Rebel and Hondo, Fenady got to work with John Wayne, writing and producing Chisum. It was The Duke's first feature after winning his Oscar for True Grit, and Fenady explains, "He was the tall strong, independent All-American. But he was also very kind and was almost symphonic in the way he greeted you."

Up next for prolific Fenady is another Western novel, but as he quips, "They say there are only six or seven plots. But there may be only one plot -- somebody loses something, and you go from there!"

Everything You Love About The Sound of Music Is a Lie

$
0
0
My mom has always been a big fan of the classic Rodgers & Hammerstein musical The Sound of Music, which portrays the tale of the von Trapp family as a bold, passionate, flee-Nazis-in-the-night kind of love story. She enjoys it so much in fact, that she roped me into watching The Sound of Music Live! on NBC, along with 18.5 million others last December.

During commercial breaks, my mom was going on and on about how the musical was based on a true story and how incredible it was that the real Maria and Georg, madly in love, defied all odds and fled the Nazis, escaping to Switzerland by traversing the Alps in the middle of the night with their seven children, suitcases and instruments in tow.

I was curious about how much of the movie's plot was true and how much was fabricated by filmmakers. While most films based on true stories include a lot of embellishments, I was surprised to find out that a lot of key elements of The Sound of Music, including the great escape and centric love story, are false.

As my mom and I quickly discovered via the U.S. National Archives and Wikipedia, Maria was pretty much "meh" about Georg when he asked her to marry him, and they didn't flee through any mountains after performing for Nazis, they booked train tickets in advance and told everyone they planned to go to America to sing, "pretending nothing," the daughter, Maria von Trapp is quoted as saying.

Here are 6 not-so-fun facts about the reality behind the von Trapp family:

6. There were actually 10 von Trapp kids, not seven, and all of the names and genders were changed for the movie.





5. Georg, who is portrayed as a pretty big prick in the beginning of the film, was actually a warm and loving father who enjoyed singing with his children. Obviously the cold, villainesque angle works better for the movie, but his family was less than pleased by the characterization.




4. Despite the von Trapps escaping to Switzerland in the film, they actually went to Italy, because Mr. von Trapp and his children were Italian citizens. And again, they didn't get to Italy by fleeing through the Alps, they booked a train ahead of time (slightly less exciting).




3. Max Detweiler, played by Christian Borle in NBC's live version, the millionaire-obsessed music promoter, actually never existed. The von Trapps' musical director was their priest.




2. Maria was far from "breathless" when she looked at Georg. She honestly wasn't even that into him. According to her autobiography, she "really and truly was not in love." She was actually mad on their wedding day because she wanted to be a nun, but apparently she was told it was "God's will" for her to marry Georg, and so it was.




1. Lastly, turns out Maria was into more than kittens' whiskers, woolen mittens and packages tied up with strings. She was also into freaking the f*** out. The description of the real Maria von Trapp paints a picture more akin to Charlie Sheen than Julie Andrews. She apparently had fits of anger where she would yell, throw things and slam doors. Her stepdaughter was quoted as saying she had a "terrible temper. . . . From one moment to the next, you didn't know what hit her. [W]e took it like a thunderstorm that would pass."




So, Sound of Music lovers, sorry if your dreams are shattered. But don't worry, you can find new, better ones, by climbing every mountain, following every rainbow and fording every stream. Just kidding, that's probably all BS, too.

My Own Private Tron: Jean-Pierre Roy at Gallery Poulsen

$
0
0
Jean-Pierre Roy is engaged as a painter in an ongoing project which appeals to me very much; and not only in my capacity as a painter, but also as a metaphysically-inclined science and science fiction geek, and as a child of the '80s. Here, take a gander at one of the paintings from his solo show "The New Me is Already Old," recently exhibited at Gallery Poulsen in Copenhagen.

2014-03-24-graphic1.jpg

Additive Field History, oil on canvas, 127 x 107 cm, 2014


A monumental figure lies on the ground, as if defeated by a superior force and submitting himself to it. The sense of surrounding scale is ambiguous, and the figure's head is obscured or replaced by colorful, sharp-looking shards. A glowing hypercube overlies his core.

The image reads as quite plausible, at the broadest level and in its details. We are in the realm of convincing special effects, of the completely imaginary made to look like the actually encountered. The figure's jeans and sneakers and rumpled windbreaker reinforce the casual and everyday about the scenario -- in Roy's universe you don't dress up in a fancy uniform for these occasions.

The general landscape, then, is the quotidian approach to the metaphysical. We are only a couple train stops away from De Chirico's deserted piazzas. And yet the imagery is not similar at all. Like De Chirico, Roy closely specifies the metaphysical in relation to his own experience of culture and the world. For me, this is felicitous, because it broadens my avenue of entry into his work.

2014-03-24-graphic2.jpg

Neometry, oil on canvas, 183 x 214 cm, 2014


Roy is only a couple of years older than I am, so his formative years for fashion and miscellaneous visual artifacts are the '80s. We see in Neometry the elements of early cyberpunk and '80s science fiction films: mirrors, lasers, pinks, turquoises, violets. Roy adds to these elements the single-minded focus of his own imagining. He amps up the contrast between mirror fragments on the figure's head, and the dark gaps between them, to make those sharp edges really cut. He composes his pink laser, edged in red, to stand out against the surrounding blues and grays so much that we can virtually hear its electric humming. The painting demands a soundtrack by Vangelis.

There is a more general element to these paintings which helps to integrate them into a longer timeline of metaphysical thought.

2014-03-24-graphic3.jpg

The Pasture, oil on canvas, 174 x 127 cm, 2014


Consider the head of the central figure in The Pasture. He has a kind of patinated bronze Grecian beard, and a technological mouth. He has no face; the rest of his head is partly obscured behind a complex polyhedron. Like the others he is a central figure, and exacts submission from a second central figure.

He is a menacing giant, with an unsettling replacement for the human head. This replacement puts him, however obscurely, in a line of descent from the gods of Egypt. The Egyptians were the masters of pasting new heads onto human bodies, seeing in it the majesty and threat of both the divine and of ideas about characteristics of the divine: recall jackal-headed Anubis, god of mummification, and Sekhmet, lion-headed goddess of war, and ram-headed Khnum, the innundator god: god of the flood. Roy's supermen are modern avatars of this frightening race. They are awful representatives of the overpower, the obliterating power, which destroys human things and yet still goes about its strangely human business on its own magnified plane.

2014-03-24-graphic4.jpg

Scope For All Directions, oil on canvas, 61 x 50 cm, 2014


I don't know that I have much more to say about this work. I get a shiver of awesome from it. It is marvelously weird and obsessively thought-through. I've asked Roy about the technologies and geometries he depicts. He confirmed my impression, that the technologies, if built, would work, and that the geometries are rigorously plotted by hand. Roy's techno-myth world is a fabulous creation. As with the work of Dorian Vallejo that we studied last week, it picks up the torch from previous lines of thought, while blasting open new artistic space in the most idiosyncratically personal of ways. More of this, I vote. As much as possible. All eccentricities welcome and celebrated. There is no better leaping-off point for a transcendence that the artist really understands and means, and is therefore in a position to pass along to us.

2014-03-24-graphic5.jpg

Shore For The Unmanned, oil on canvas, 102 x 76 cm, 2014


--

All images courtesy of the artist.

Jean-Pierre Roy online.

The New Me Is Already Old
Gallery Poulsen, Copenhagen
February 21-March 23

Maria Lassnig -- At 94, Finally Getting Her Due in New York

$
0
0
After 70 years of painting, Maria Lassnig is finally getting her first New York show and it is beautiful. Maria Lassnig's show recently opened at MOMA PS1 and it is an almost complete retrospective of one woman's work from 1942 to 2011. It is a pleasure to walk the gallery and see how her work changed and yet how it keeps a common line through her color choices and subject matter.

As you actually enter the museum you are greeted with Selbstportraet mit Sprechblase (Self-Portrait with Speech Bubble) 2006. It vibrates in tones of pink and bright green and invites visitors to think about what a self-portrait means. In this age of selfie culture, what does it mean when the subject has much more to say beyond what's visible on the outside?

When you walk into her gallery, you notice the bright lighting, white walls and white floors. Space is obliterated and you are forced to focus solely on her work. On the far wall as you enter the main gallery you see Du, Oder Ich? (You or Me) 2005. A painting of Maria holding a gun to her head in one hand and a gun pointed at the viewer in the other. It is clear that this woman has something to say.

Walk to the right and move through the gallery in a counter-clockwise direction to view her work chronologically. One of the first works you see is Selbstporträt (Self-Portrait) 1942. This was her first self-portrait done while she was still in school and reflects the time period with its Rembrandt style and color choices. Maria wasn't satisfied. Three years later and to the right you'll find Selbstporträt expressiv (Expressive Self-Portrait) 1945. It is only three years but a world of difference. You see the beginnings of what she would go on to explore throughout her seven-decade career. It is what she termed Body Awareness and she wanted to capture how she felt inside and not how she looked on the outside. The lines are quick and the paint is rough and in places incomplete (she wanted only to paint the parts of herself that she felt) you also begin to see the color choices she goes on to make throughout her career. The bright greens, pinks and reds and her focus begins to concentrate on the eyes.

The room features painting from the 1950s and early '60s that showcase her interest in forms and color and you can see influences by Ellsworth Kelly. Maria had left her native Austria for Paris around this time and begins to be heavily influenced by Abstract Expressionism from New York. In the next room you see work in which she placed large canvases on the floor and began to paint lines in boundless directions based on the way her body moved that day. She would go back and name them afterwards one of my favorites here is Napoleon und Brigitte Bardot 1961. She also begins to explore the inside of her body with two paintings titled Ohne Titel (Untitled) c. 1960.

The next room features work that begins to examine trauma, feminism and probably her frustration with the art world. Take a look at Selbstportrait unter Plastik 1972 and Dreifaches Selbstporträt / New Self 1970-72. It is around this time that she moved to New York and stays and paints for the next decade. Walk into the next room and you see a selection of her watercolors. Here the room is dimly lit to reinforce the fact that she would keep her eyes closed and paint from her minds eye in these quick studies. Again she was interested in the eyes as a tool and painting from the inside out. Check out Was mir beim Wort "Liebe" einfiel (What the word "love" made me think of) 1980.

The next room showcases her work in which she paints the body as mechanical with superhuman or alien abilities. She becomes interested in technology and science and the impact of television imagery. You can see that in Transparentes Selbstporträt, (Transparent Self Portrait) 1987, Kuechenbraut (Kitchen Bride) 1988 and Kleines Sciencefiction-Selbstporträt (Small Science Fiction Self Portrait) 1995.

The last room features paintings that explore her thoughts on her own mortality. It also features another one of my favorites and one of her most recent titled Vom Tode gezeichnet (Marked By Death) 2011. It shows the artist painting herself in death. The bright orange color feels in stark contrast to the subject matter.

The show makes you think about all that she has seen since she started painting in 1942 from technological advances to the rise of feminism. One of her lifetime goals was to have a show in New York. Now at 94 she has finally been given her chance and it is long overdue. Marie Lassnig now at MOMA PS1 through May 25.

Click here for a look at a few images from the show.

The Next Big Thing

$
0
0
Mike Hamel is a singer/songwriter from upstate New York with a lot to say. Hamel recorded Where the Change Is (a 6-song disc available on Itunes, Spotify, Rhapsody, and others) with the help of a successful Kickstarter campaign. He is currently working on his first full-length release, tentatively titled "Truth & Lies". Hamel's music can be described as alternative rock, though his influences range from Jeff Buckley to The Roots. His solo performances are emotional and raw while his full-band shows are orchestrated and full of energy. He had a video that went viral and made the rounds last summer, called, "Hell, No You Can't Use My song in a Porno." It was based on a real-life incident wherein he learned that a song off his first EP was featured prominently in a heterosexual porn movie called The Ultimate Creampie. The song is hysterical and the incident even more so, because he's also openly gay, which is becoming less and less an anomaly in the rock and roll world.

How did you get into music?

I, very luckily came from a very musical family. I grew up around house parties and get-togethers where eventually, the night would turn into a huge jam session. I have an aunt and uncle who play in a band together, all of my cousins play guitar or drums or something, my brother (who's no doubt my biggest influence) has always been a die-hard bass player. My grandmother was the best, though. She'd get behind the upright piano with her scotch resting on top, pass out sheet music of showtunes to the family, and just play for hours as everyone hollered along. So as far as starting to play music, it had to be around 5 or 7 when I first started messing with singing and guitar. By the time I was 13, I really dove into the instrument. I spent hours, literally HOURS, just jamming in my room. I'd get a new favorite band, learn as much as I can by playing their songs, and just woodshed the hell out of it. I also had a few friends who played instruments as well so we did the required garage/basement bands all through junior high and high school. We were right on the cusp of tape trading and being underground with my high-school band, Arise/Aethyr (we couldn't settle on a name). We actually passed out cassette tapes of our music that we recorded at home. And this was BEFORE tapes were ironic and cool!

What's the hardest part of being an independent artist?

The hardest part for me is sheer economics. It's really hard to stay afloat financially while pouring everything you have of your heart, soul, and wallet into a project. The casual music enthusiast tends to overlook how much is really needed to get the music they're listening to into their iPod/phone/whatever. Because the gigs and merch sales only pay so much, this usually means having to take on a day job, full-time or otherwise, and that just taxes your energy and body even more. It's sad to say that finances have such a big effect on the artistry, but it's a butterfly effect. The other side of the coin on this issue is that publicizing yourself has become easier than ever. With social media being as big as it is, you can reach a huge amount of people pretty easily. It all comes down to heart and drive. If you have those two, you can overcome any obstacle life throws at you.

What have been the biggest hurdles you've faced getting to where you are?

Really, I can narrow it down to one thing: self doubt. That's the only thing that ever impeded my progress as a professional artist. It kept me from taking the risks when I should have, participating in self-destructive behavior, and basically just sabotaging my whole career. Things seems to come a lot easier if you just take opportunities when they come up (within reason). I've really been trying to live by this creed for the past couple of years and it has, without a doubt, brought me a lot more success in every realm of my music. I've played at some incredible places, met some amazing musicians, gone on tour working with major-label bands, brought music to children who might never have been exposed to it... I could go on and on. But really, the doubt was my biggest hurdle.

Is it challenging being a gay artist who does rock and roll?. As opposed to pop/dance music? Or has the world changed?

It's definitely different. When I go out and do open mics and coffee houses and things like that, I feel a lot more at ease with the crowd and other artists. This is kind of unfounded though because every time I've had to "re-come-out" to people I've played with in the rock world, most of the response has been "Cool!" or "Really?!", followed by a myriad of almost-too-personal questions. Being gay in the pop/dance world is a non-issue at this point. The LGBTQ community is such a big demographic for those styles of music that I feel like they'd be alienating their audience if they weren't so accepting. The amount of gay artists in those genres is also significantly higher than that of the rock world. Not to say there haven't been huge gay rock icons. Think about Rob Halford (Judas Priest), Freddie Mercury (Queen), Elton John, Michael Stipe (REM), Doug Pinnick (King's X), David Bowie (kind of)... hahaha. They're out there. They're still out there. Hopefully there will be more of a gay presence in the years to come for rock and roll, but unfortunately, a huge portion of rock's main demo lives in areas that are very conservative and still don't accept being gay as... well... a non-issue. Not that it's not important, but to have it come first on someone's judgment about an artist is bullshit. The world is changing but we still have a long way to go.

When did you come out? What were the circumstances?

I came out when I was 21. I was out at a show with a very dear friend of mine seeing another friend's band play. The night was just an exploding point of emotions for me. I couldn't have been in a better place talking to a better person than I was. What really led me to actually come out was myself. I was fed up with hiding. At the time, I had a pretty serious drug problem, due mainly in part to trying to hide from myself. I did that fairly successfully through my teen years, but I was never really happy. I was in fact a very angry person. I knew I was gay. There was no doubt in my mind about that. I was just so afraid of being vulnerable and worrying about what people would think or say about me. I grew up in a pretty small town where everyone knew everyone. On top of that, there is virtually no gay community up here (upstate New York) to speak of. I was never exposed to gay people (in person) and I think that made me have this bigger detachment from the idea that it's normal and totally okay. All of this came to a head that night at the bar. I dragged my friend Dane outside for a cigarette and just said "Dude, I gotta tell you something... ". And he, like, already knew. We talked and hung out into the wee hours of the night and I felt a million times better. After that, I cleaned up my act, embraced who I was, and have been much happier since.

Do you think it informs your music?

It definitely informs or influences my music. I also have such a broad catalog of artists (many of them gay) that I listen to, being gay must work its way into my music. Lyrically, I definitely talk about being in love, loss, struggle, confusion, indecision... My pre-coming out work, when you really look at the words on the page... It just makes so much sense. In my band Dolor (a hard rock band I fronted for 6 years), the subject matter was always very dark. I was talking about the pain I was in and the mental anguish I was going through dealing with being closeted while battling depression and being lonely and drugs and so on and so on... In a way, it's definitely addressing an aspect of the issue. However, after I came out, my lyrical content switched drastically. I wasn't afraid to say how I felt or who I was anymore. I went on to write many love songs with male pronouns, one even being a story about how my then-partner and I met and our ensuing struggle to be together. The funny thing is, in my current songs, I'm much less drastic about bringing the gay element to my music, but it's there more than ever. It comes through still, but it's more of a nod-and-a-wink kind of thing. There's actually a line in a song I'm recording for my new record that says, "It's my favorite song / the city noise / staring at the boys out on the street / They can't compete with what you do to me." It's a pretty clear cut line, but when you're hearing it for the first time at a concert, it's just enough to hit you and have you go, "Wait, did he just say... ?" I love being able to incorporate it like that. Balancing being blatant with coy. It's difficult, but I feel like I can pull it off.

What's next?

I'm currently working on a full-length album called Truth and Lies. It's a really cool collection of songs that run the gamut from quiet and emotional to dancey and raucous. I'm really aiming to make something you can sit and listen to all the way thru and not get bored. I'm performing all instruments on this record aside from drums, which is pretty much my m.o.

2014-03-25-MHweb.jpg


Photo by Diane Landro
Viewing all 14859 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>