Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 14859 articles
Browse latest View live

'Rocky' is a Broadway Knockout

$
0
0
Rocky's got me hanging on the ropes.

There's an old Hollywood taboo that says movies about boxing are box-office suicide. On the stage, where money is tight, space limitations prevent a third wall between the actors and the audience, and words and feelings are more important than movement, plays about sports are almost never even attempted--much less musicals (although even with its limitations, I remember enjoying Sammy Davis, Jr. in Golden Boy). Now comes the musical version of none other than Rocky, the movie that broke records, donning the gloves and ready to break them all over again.

Rocky is a smash hit that shows no sign of slowing down. It arrives with walls of awards and prizes from every corner, and blue-ribbon credentials for days. Sylvester Stallone, who wrote the original screenplay, is a producer and a collaborator on the book (with Thomas Meehan, who wrote Annie and The Producers). The rich and serviceable score is by the Tony winning songwriters Stephen Flaherty and Lynn Ahrens (Ragtime). And just as the movie and its numerous, dog-eared sequels turned Sylvester Stallone into some kind of scruffy stardom, the new singing, dancing, two-fisted Rocky repeats history with a sexy, dynamic, three-dimensional flesh-and-blood star named Andy Karl. He's the biggest thing since Hugh Jackman, and as Rocky Balboa, the unlucky, downtrodden bum from the slums of Philly with a heart of molasses and the I.Q. of a mollusk, dreaming of being somebody in the eyes of the world even if fame is a one-night stand, he is very much the center of Rocky. He sings with power and persuasion--and surprisingly in tune. He dances in and out of the ring with complex precision. He looks like a movie star. He's virile, he's in command of the stage, he's a one-man hormone explosion. He has charisma, a camera-ready physique from the cover of Today's Health, and the kind of body language that leaves the audience transfixed from beginning to end. If Rocky ever ends, watch out for more big things from this guy. He is merely sensational.

He begins too old for the ring, barely eking out a day's pay by supplementing his poverty collecting debts for a gang of thug. He's got bruises, bloodstains and a black eye, but he's also got pride. When he sings "My Nose Ain't Broken Yet", he's the kind of gentle musclehead you just gotta root for. "Hang up the gloves, go to trade school, become a garage mechanic," advises the cauliflower-eared has-been who eventually becomes his manager. After seven years at the gym, they even close down his locker to make room for younger guys. Hanging around his room at night, he's a lonely bloke whose only companions are his pet turtles. But in a slick, low-key style that seems to be kidding Paddy Chayefsky's Marty, Rocky meets Adrian (golden-voiced Margo Seibert), a mousy spinster who works in a pet shop. She sings about his "broken face, hardscrabble life and sad, brown eyes" and after one crush of Rocky's biceps, Adrian throws away her glasses and starts shopping at Macy's.

It's 1976, America's bicentennial, and a perfect time to give an underdog the chance to prove America's motto that everyone is equal. Rocky gets his break when he's recruited to fight the championship match against Apollo (Terence Archie), the indestructible, bullet-headed black heavyweight champion of the world. Act One ends with 29 days to the fight. The audience rushes in after the break, ready for bear, and the second act follows a series of training montages in which Rocky beefs up even more, through his first Christmas as a happy couple with Adrian, and it eventually culminates in the Big Event itself. The odds are against Rocky. Nobody's ever gone 15 rounds against Apollo. But if he does win, there's a $150,000 jackpot and proof forever that the guy is more than a loser. Well, no need to tell you how it all turns out. Is there anyone not forbidden by religious dogma to go to the movies who has never seen Rocky?

What I must tell you--and the best reason of all to see the musical--is that you have never experienced anything on a Broadway stage like the championship bout that brings the show to a screaming, tumultuous finale. Multi-media staging with live TV cameras projecting the action on giant screens. Film montages. All choreographed in slow motion while being simultaneously. You are catapulted into the next best thing to Madison Garden before you know what hit you. Under the massively coordinated direction of Alex Timbers, the vast orchestra of the Winter Garden Theatre empties, a crew removes the seats, and the audience is marched onstage while the place is transformed into an actual boxing match with the ring in the center, surrounded by stadium bleachers where the stage used to be! I can still hear the stomping, cheering "Bravos" ringing in my ears like Democrats on Election Night.

People who diss Rocky because it's old-fashioned and predictable are right. It's sort of a construction worker's Raging Bull with Kleenex. But the people who love Rocky are right, too, because it's likeable and decent in a basic way that makes you glow. You go away from Rocky hugely entertained, with a song in your soul and hope in your heart.

Aisle View: Rock 'em Sock 'em

$
0
0
Taking a blockbuster audience-pleasing motion picture phenomenon, adding songs, and transforming the thing into a big, spectacular Broadway musical capable of pulling in every rabid or incidental fan of said movie who passes through the City of New York can be a recipe for success. Or failure, as the purveyors of the recent Spider-Man learned when they drowned in a sea of Spiderman-red ink.

Now we have yet another extravaganza in which the title alone tells you just about everything you need to know: Rocky. (Refreshingly, they refrain from calling it "Rocky The Musical.") If you wanna see Sylvester Stallone's iconic pugilist battling Apollo Creed live on stage, in an arena where you can viscerally absorb the blows and pretty much smell the sweat, the Winter Garden is the place to be. (The Winter Garden building was converted, 103 years ago, from William K. Vanderbilt's American Horse Exchange.) Expect no surprises. But then, fans who know the film frame-by-frame do not need or desire surprises. You can tell this by the roars of recognition that greet assorted lines or "business" from the movie.

It turns out that Rocky is better than the aforementioned Spider-Man, by several notches in the proverbial heavyweight belt. The Cinderella story, such as it is, is durable; and the sure-to-be-much-talked-about staging of the climactic boxing match more or less delivers the punch of excitement required. This despite score, libretto, staging and choreography that are unlikely to merit awards even in this thus-far lazy season for new Broadway musicals.

Mr. Stallone, who wrote the screenplay and created the role of the iconic "Italian Stallion" in the 1976 Best Picture-winner and five sequels, is back on the ropes as co-librettist (with Thomas Meehan of Annie and The Producers) and co-lead producer. Fortunately, though, he has seen fit to hang up his trunks. Andy Karl, who theatergoers will remember from The Mystery of Edwin Drood and Legally Blonde, is today's Stallone. He is incredibly hard-working and just about has his brains knocked out in the title role; one is impressed by his durability more than his singing and acting, maybe, but that is a perquisite for this particular role.

Otherwise, the leading players aren't given much to work with. Margo Seibert, who played the title role in last fall's intriguing-but-overlooked downtown musical Tamar of the River and here makes her Broadway debut, gives the evening's most appealing performance as Adrian. The character is drawn as a drab wallflower who is suddenly and unapologetically transformed--offstage, when she stops at a dress shop--into a wise and attractive leading lady. Still, the musical is at its best (non-pugilistically speaking) when Seibert is singing.

Rocky's nemesis Apollo Creed is played by Terence Archie, who fights the role well. His character is a walking racial stereotype, bordering on the offensive; the authors also give him three "girls" for backup in musical numbers that might raise a snicker or two. Dakin Matthews plays crusty trainer Mickey, the role which put oldtimer Burgess Meredith back on the showbiz map in 1976. Here, Matthews isn't given much to do and he is saddled with one of those creaky how-it-was-back-in-the-old-days songs.

Songwriters Stephen Flaherty and Lynn Ahrens, who are known for creative and intriguingly crafted musicals such as Ragtime and Once on This Island, have weighed in with disappointingly flavorless wares. One gets the impression that they were glad to get the job--every good Broadway songwriter deserves at least one smash hit musical, to put them in permanent royalty heaven--but wound up simply writing what the employers wanted. It is mighty difficult to write intelligently theatrical songs for barely literate characters, which might be part of the problem. And which might be why Ms. Seibert's songs come off better than the rest.

The book is not helpful, but what more can the librettists do than meanderingly get us to the culminating nine-minute boxing match? (Mr. Meehan, typically, throws in jokes along the way.) Director Alex Timbers (Here Lies Love) keeps things moving, literally, while the choreography of Steven Hoggett (Once) and Kelly Devine is underwhelming. The training montages, presumably by Hoggett, are far more effective--which might be why the second act seems infinitely more engaging than the first. But still, all the audience can do is wait until Rocky gets in the ring.

Said ring is something of a marvel, the highlight of Christopher Barreca's massive scenery. As the fight approaches, patrons in the first ten rows center--which they are calling the "Golden Circle"--are herded to onstage bleachers. A clutch of Local One stagehands scurry into the house with stage braces and other paraphernalia to support the ring, which then rolls out over the prime orchestra seats. (The Winter Garden's mezzanine is wide but not especially deep--it's an old horse barn, remember?--making this perhaps the only Broadway venue with sight lines that would accommodate the production.) This allows them to stage a rock 'em sock 'em battle, right down front.

Karl and Archie land their punches, all right, although the match is sculpted, edited, time-compressed and slo-moed. It is, all told, a crowd-pleasing rouser. (Broadway saw more artful fighting action last season in Lincoln Center Theater's revival of Golden Boy, but Rocky is pitched to a decidedly different market.) Rocky's title bout puts the show over the top, entertainment-wise. This might not be enough to please the dedicated theatre crowd, but no matter; if diehard Rocky fans leave the show enraptured, word-of-mouth and repeat visits could provide the Winter Garden with yet another long-running superhit.

Correcting the Rumors

$
0
0
Four years ago, I chose to primarily ignore a cycle of Internet gossip and false accusations against me. At that time, I felt that to dignify them with a response was a betrayal of my work and my character. When these allegations resurfaced over the past few months, they seemed especially vicious and distorted, moving outside the realm of critical dialogue and becoming nothing more than an emotionally-charged witch hunt. Enabled and protected by the freewheeling and often times anonymous nature of the Internet, people have become comfortable concocting hate-filled and libelous tales about my professional and personal lives. In writing this, I make a humble attempt at correcting these rumors, because I have come to realize that absent my voice in the conversation, all that remain are the lies.

When I moved to New York in 1990 to take pictures, a lot of my work was a documentation of my life in the East Village; it was gritty, transgressive, and the aesthetic broke with the well-lit, polished fashion images of the time. My first big campaign, shot in 1994, was a provocative picture of a couple embracing in a bar. It was a shocking image for its time and the first instance a photograph of this nature was used in a major fashion advertisement.

Like Robert Mapplethorpe, Helmut Newton, and so many others before me, sexual imagery has always been a part of my photography. Ten years ago, in 2004, I presented some of this work at a gallery show in New York City, accompanied by a book of the photos. The show was very popular and highly praised. The images depicted sexual situations and explored the beauty, rawness, and humor that sexuality entails. I collaborated with consenting adult women who were fully aware of the nature of the work, and as is typical with any project, everyone signed releases. I have never used an offer of work or a threat of rebuke to coerce someone into something that they did not want to do. I give everyone that I work with enough respect to view them as having ownership of their free will and making their decisions accordingly, and as such, it has been difficult to see myself as a target of revisionist history. Sadly, in the on-going quest for controversy-generated page views, sloppy journalism fueled by sensationalized, malicious, and manipulative recountings of this work has given rise to angry Internet crusades. Well-intentioned or not, they are based on lies. Believing such rumors at face value does a disservice not only to the spirit of artistic endeavor, but most importantly, to the real victims of exploitation and abuse.

People will always have strong opinions about challenging images, and the dichotomy of sex is that it is both the most natural and universal of human behaviors and also one of the most sensitive and divisive. Over the course of my career, I have come to accept that some of my more provocative work courts controversy, and as an artist, I value the discourse that arises from this. I can only hope for this discourse to be informed by fact, so that whether you love my work or hate it, you give it, and me, the benefit of the truth.

Read more HuffPost coverage of Terry Richardson here.

WATCH: This Woman With Cerebral Palsy Wants You To Laugh At Her (No...Seriously)

$
0
0
If thinking of cerebral palsy makes you think of someone sad or helpless, then watch this talk and let comedian Maysoon Zayid blow your mind. She's fierce, she's funny, and she refuses to let you feel sorry for her.

Ideas are not set in stone. When exposed to thoughtful people, they morph and adapt into their most potent form. TEDWeekends will highlight some of today's most intriguing ideas and allow them to develop in real time through your voice! Tweet #TEDWeekends to share your perspective or email tedweekends@huffingtonpost.com to learn about future weekend's ideas to contribute as a writer.

Drama Kid Stereotypes Busted!

$
0
0
Drama kids are heavily stereotyped. People tend to see us as crazy, loud, sometimes annoying people with an obnoxious love for the arts. We are sometimes criticized for liking Anne Hathaway too much and crying about Les Miserables. There are many memes, or blog pages dedicated to us and our excitability over "everything theater."

Though most of the things listed here are applicable to us and what we stand for, it is sometimes misrepresented, putting into a faulty spotlight, as one would have it. It is hurting our reputations... and our feelings a little bit. This blog was written to raise awareness of how we really feel and how we actually spend our time. We are just calm, optimistic, dedicated kids who do more than people realize. Also guys, we do sports, dance is a sport! Okay, moving on.

1. A common stereotype is that we are always hanging out in the drama room at our school. This is not true! Drama kids are always out and about. For example, getting lunch at the nearest sandwich shop; nothing like a quick burrito at Chipotle before heading to drama rehearsal!

Another place you can find us is on Tumblr blogging about relatable theater things, rehearsal, complaining about how much rehearsal we have, in our cars driving to rehearsal and sneaking out to another burrito because everyone asked for bites of your other one. See, drama kids move around.

2. Another assumption people have formed about us is that we constantly quote musicals. That is not true! I knew a drama kid once who -- once... wait that reminds me of "Falling slowly, eyes that know me"... I'm sorry, where was I again? Oh, yeah! Quoting songs and musicals. You know, most drama kids actual defy that stereotype -- "you and I defying gravity!" I'm sorry, I just love musicals, and they can just be so modern as well as... "everything today is thoroughly modern!" Then there are other musicals that make me sad -- "when the bee stings, when I'm feeling sad." Good God, I hope I'm not boring you... "mama who bore me!" Well, okay, maybe just because I do it, doesn't mean all drama kids do!

3. A third misconception we must tackle is that the only thing drama kids think about is the department. That is totally false! We don't obsess about the drama department. We talk about what shows they will do next, who will star in them, what the costumes will look like and who is having the cast party. Not to mention who didn't show up to rehearsal that week, the flu that seems to be going around even though show week is coming up, and much, much more. Psh, they thought we talked only about the department!

I just have a dream that one day -- "I dreamed a dream in time gone by... " -- that one day people will stop encouraging these falsehoods around the drama kids, the department, the notion that we obsess about the possible leads for next year's musical (which should totally be Thoroughly Modern Millie by the way). Also, we aren't always in the drama room. We need to go get food and bring it back -- duh! We are a group that is heavily stereotyped and I hope that doesn't discourage you from joining us, because as the saying goes, "We're all in this together!"

If You Ain't a Reflection, You're a Wave: Interview With Matthew Fisher

$
0
0
Matthew Fisher was Born in Boston, grew up in Three Rivers, Michigan, and lives and works in Brooklyn, New York. He received a BFA from Columbus College of Art and Design, and an MFA from VCU. He was a recipient of the NYFA Fellowship, and a resident at Yaddo, the Millay Colony, and the Vermont Studio Center. He recently had a solo show at Mulherin+Pollard Projects, NY, and his current show at Ampersand Gallery, Portland, Oregon will run through March 23rd.

Please visit Ampersand Gallery for more info on his current show.

2014-03-14-MF_waveforjd_.jpg

Wave (for J.D.), 2014, Acrylic on canvas, 15 x 19 in, courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Gallery, Portland, OR



RH: You seem to always play with the idea of genre. You've dealt with history painting, portraiture, still life, and landscape -- but your involvement is fresh, and very much your own.

MF: Painting things has always been a part of my thought process. It seemed like every young painter in school wants to have the brash of Robert Motherwell or the skills to paint like a photograph. I quickly learned I was neither. I found myself fussing over a brushstroke I had just made, trying to improve it. To start a painting, there had to be something, a representation, for me. I love abstraction -- I just can't paint like that. I love the idea of an image being nothing and everything at the same time, but I just don't think that way. While these new works come closer to abstraction than I have previously ventured, they remain grounded in our world. Our knowledge of what nature is, helps us complete the images.

RH: Landscape was always a major character in your work, even as a setting, and now it is the focal point. How did that shift come about?

MF: After my first solo show at RARE in 2009, I wanted to try to make paintings without using figures. For the next two years I made symbolic still life paintings that hinted at a presence without actually showing a figure. After my second show, I hit a wall. I saw my process of painting as piling objects and animals together, creating a forced narrative out of associations of proximity, and that was it. After months of trying to paint something, I walked into the studio and told myself to make a drawing of nothing. Nothing is never just nothing; but, I saw the horizon line, where water meets sky, as being both empty and full. The openness of looking out over an endless sea was the nothing I was looking for.

2014-03-14-MF_deadcandance_.jpg

Dead Can Dance, 2014, Acrylic on canvas, 16 x 20 in, courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Gallery, Portland, OR



RH: The waves in the newest paintings feel alive, yet they are composed primarily of geometric shapes. There is a tension in their simplicity. You can feel this very strict containment of the water, which gives them a power. At the same time, they are painted in softer, pretty colors that make them playful and Pop.

MF: The new work exists in an interesting limbo between natural and artificial, of showing action and stillness, depicting an image that is universal, but also personal. Being both, while simultaneously being neither, gives the generic images I use (a wave, cloud or sunset), a new edge. The colors come out my use of acrylic paint. Their saturated colors help complicate one's expectation of what is natural and real. The same goes for the use of geometric shapes. How else are you going to paint these images?

RH: They also play with the formal language of painting. There is a wonderful sense of design. Do you focus primarily on those aspects of an image or is there a narrative involved as well?

MF: The beauty of painting is that there is this formal language, a deep history of what has been done. The materials haven't changed, it's always been pigment rubbed onto cloth that is stretched over wooden sticks. By continuing to work within the material limitations, I am more able to play with the elements of design, color and image. I first got into art through photography, and the act of looking through a SLR camera lens trained my eye and brain to think inside rectangular shapes. Jack Beal taught me to respect the edges of compositions by allowing objects or actions to go right up to the edges, but never over them. Often objects only leave the bottom edge of my paintings. Lately, I have found my best ideas come to me when I have no ideas. I force myself to play with and push out what ever comes to my mind in that moment of clarity. This creates the most interesting images for me. Another strategy is to do the opposite of whatever I was doing before. By challenging my color or composition choices, I better understand how they work by seeing them in a new way.

2014-03-14-MF_RoyalOnement_.jpg

Royal Onement, 2014, Acrylic on canvas, 40 x 18 in, courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Gallery, Portland, OR



RH: Your work balances highly rendered areas, highly un-rendered areas, and painterly effects. Do you see this as giving the paintings a type of tension?

MF: My painting process has always started from the furthest point back. By painting the sky first, I can use the larger brushes and many layers of transparency to create atmosphere and gradations that cannot be made with my smaller brushes. Still, before I begin working on the foreground, the background has to contain something that excites me. This can result in up to ten layers or more of paint to create a color fade before I begin to add the rest of the painting. Despite the clean edges in the final painting, my painting process is very messy.

RH: Funny to see the sparkle foam as painterly magic.

MF: The sparkle and spray is, in fact, a mini splatter. The force and energy of the crashing wave is perfectly frozen by this painterly action. The spray looks real, because it is real. Still, it doubles as a stand in for what real spray looks like. Again, I am playing with this notion of being both real and fake, of stillness and motion. For me, the beauty of painting is that it can be so simple that it becomes deep.

RH: There are nods to numerous painters (Lissitzky, Arp, Léger, and countless Americans). Are these references at the forefront of your thoughts or a more integrated part of your process?

MF: Art History is always on my mind. About three or fours years ago, I stopped looking at as much art as I had been previously. This choice was not out of ignorance, but rather an attempt to keep my mind clear. After years of working in galleries, framers, and art moving companies in New York, I have constantly been exposed to all kinds and periods of art. I am not completely interested in referencing other painters' work, of making art about art. That type of inside joke bores me. I want to be able to take and use whatever I wish, in order to make the painting work. This kind of arrogance requires a knowledge and understanding of art. After two decades of looking and studying art, I feel comfortable to pull away, or at least walk on the other side of the street, when I make my art. The images I make aren't completely new; no artist today could hold themselves up to that standard. Rather, my paintings play with my own visual assumptions of reality, history, and knowledge. What you know isn't always what you see. And what you see isn't always what you know.

2014-03-14-MF_GreenthegoodnightTurned_.jpg

Green the Night Turned, 2014, Acrylic on canvas, 40 x 25 in, courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Gallery, Portland, OR



RH: Your work has always merged a kind of realism, with Pop cartoonishness. I know you like a lot of the Chicago imagists. Did they influence your thinking early on?

MF: Roger Brown was my idol in art school, and still is. His language of representation and abstraction, of playing with space and scale is so good. He also opened my eyes to other ways of making and showing space within a painting. Why must American art obey western perspective or photographic space? If Giorgio de Chirico tore up the perspective handbook, Roger Brown put it back together, but in a different order. The Chicago Imagists also looked toward the untrained artists to help them understand what it means to make an image. Attending art school in Columbus, Ohio, I was exposed at an early age to two of America's greatest 20th century folk artists: William Hawkins and Elijah Pierce. Their freshness and strangeness was the answer to so many art school questions posed to me. Like Roger Brown and Ray Yoshida, Hawkins and Pierce taught me the importance of imagery, narrative, and gave me permission to play with depicted space.

RH: I think you introduced me to Rockwell Kent in about 2002. These new paintings seem to have a lot of Kent in them. Is he still on your radar?

MF: Rockwell Kent is one of American's great painters. Kent's paintings contain an energy and sensibility that only come through observation. Although he's not the influence on me that he was before, his truthfulness in details give his work the reality that my work plays against. As specific as his work is, in terms of actual location, mine is universal. The Vulcan proverb "Only Nixon could go to China" is never far from my mind. I can only make these paintings because I live right now.

2014-03-14-MF_HalfMoonBay_.jpg

Half Moon Bay, 2013, Acrylic on canvas, 14.5 x 12 in, courtesy of the artist and Ampersand Gallery, Portland, OR



RH: Thinking back, though your work can have a kind of sadness or even dark psychology, the paintings always feel celebratory in a way. There is a joy in the 'event' of your paintings, even in their restraint. Do you see the work as emotional or joyous?

MF: That's an interesting question. When asked if the works are depictions of sunrises or sunsets, I have to answer that I have seen more sunsets than sunrises in my life. There is a practical side to these images, a bewilderment of nature. Waves have been crashing and clouds floating for as long as time itself. Nature always does its thing; we're just in the way. The fun thought is that there is a world of life hidden just below the surface. These exact truths don't fuel my work, but I just love the idea that a single line, horizontal to the bottom of canvas, automatically sets up a here and there, us and them, land and sea, lost and found. It's as old as time.

Joyce Kozloff's Cradles to Conquests: Mapping American Military History

$
0
0
In her 1989 review of feminist philosopher Sara Ruddick's book Maternal Thinking, Towards a Politics of Peace, Maureen Quilligan considers the link between motherhood and world peace. The duress of caring for infants and young toddlers can be so extreme, she writes, that mothers inevitably have moments when they wish to harm or even kill their children. As a father, I can attest to the fact that while holding an inconsolably screaming baby, I have felt that I could lose control of my frustration. But somehow I've managed to grit my teeth, stay as calm as possible, and try to comfort The Howling. In moments like these, Ruddick and Quilligan agree, mothers (and fathers who perform "maternal work") choose restraint over aggression. Maternal protection involves, "first of all...not murdering the baby." Refusing to act on such impulses creates a model for peace between adults and even nations.

2014-03-13-Targetswomaninside2.jpg

Targets, 2000, acrylic/canvas/wood, 108" diameter

Cradles to Conquests, Kozloff's first solo show in New Jersey, takes a long hard look at the history of American military adventures. The show is awash in violence, including works with maps on which Kozloff has overlaid the movements of US forces, or marked all the sites we have bombed. It is a grim record. Targets, a nine-foot sphere, dominates the gallery, its colorful interior open for entry through a single panel. Walk in and be surrounded by aviation charts recording American bombing campaigns from 1945-2000. Light descends through an oculus at the structure's apex, ironically suggesting the sanctity of a church, but also the imperial power of the Roman Pantheon and its modern-day equivalents.

Kozloff somehow finds a degree of whimsy in many of her images without reducing their impact. This is especially true of her Boys' Art series, in which she collages arrangements of soldiers onto old maps of forts, along with her son's drawings of superheroes like the X-Men, Avengers, or the Fantastic Four. A founder of the Pattern and Decoration movement in the 1970s, she is adept at creating rhythms and relationships that sustain visual interest while connecting the dots between comic book violence and the grownup kind.

2014-03-13-15CitadelofHue.jpg

Boys' Art: The Citadel of Hue, 2002, collage, pencils/paper, 12 x 18", 24 in

By contrast, in a series titled Manifest Destiny, her collages are filled with pictures of monsters, demons, skulls, and aliens cut from gaming magazines. These large works feel dark and despairing -- framed by children's book illustrations of cowboys and Indians, the central imagery done in blacks and grays, zombie and monster heads piling up like bodies in a mass grave. The tenor of these pictures reflects contemporary video games in all their bloody mayhem, and constitutes both a retroactive indictment of American expansion and a present-day cri de couer against our global military action.

Somewhere between the relatively lighthearted approach of Boys Art and the jarring doom of Manifest Destiny lies a third series of collages, American History. The composition of each picture centers on the same fort, and features a variety of collaged combatants swarming the landscape in all-over mayhem. Nuking the Japs is the most eye-catching with its strong yellows, a color choice that archly summons Western racist stereotypes. The array of collaged figures is at times amusing, with ancient-looking line drawings of scholars and peasants juxtaposed with futuristic alien warriors, lending a breath of silliness to the proceedings.

2014-03-13-nukingthejaps.jpg
American History Series # 7: Nuking the Japs, 2004, mixed media/paper, 33 x 47.75"

Like the collages themselves, the exhibition is dense: the pieces in Manifest Destiny and American History are so packed with information that careful viewing is a demanding experience. The works are also hung close together, amplifying the feeling of an overwhelming cycle of violence on infinite repeat. By the end I was put in mind of Heironymus Bosch, whose paintings are similarly dark, crowded, and leavened with humor in unexpected places.

Though Kozloff offers no overt glimmers of hope for a better tomorrow, there is a dim but real spark implicit in announcing herself as a mother through her Boys Art series. Incorporating her son's drawings, she signals her own maternal thinking, which both Quilligan and Ruddick believe holds the seeds of peace. Kozloff has a long history of feminist anti-war activism and art, and it does not feel like a stretch in this battle-soaked exhibit to find the quiet presence of the mother as an alternative force. Indeed, sharing the gallery floor with Targets is Rocking the Cradle, a large wooden cradle whose interior is decorated with a map of the bygone territory of Mesopotamia, now the Middle East, covered with arrows showing the 2003 American invasion of Iraq. At the risk of sounding naive, one might hope that as fathers are increasingly involved in raising their children and mothers occupy more seats of political power, future generations might enjoy a less violent world.

at Rowan University Art Gallery through March 15

Sticky Dates and Wanderlust

$
0
0
This story is the second installment of a three-part series on the Riyadh Writing Club, a group of young female writers in Saudi Arabia. Read the first part and second part here.

"At 3:54 flight number FR24 LH1353 from RUH to STO crashed into the ocean.
Most of the passengers were sound asleep.
There were no survivors.
The sky was bleeding."


Brief silence. Gasps of disbelief. Then, thunderous applause. The young, slightly edgy Saudi women look around the living room at each other as they clap, terrified but clearly delighted by the morbid direction the story took.

"My heart hurts!" one exclaims.

"Why would you do that?" another cries.

"I hate planes!" a third declares.

Then, the accolades come. The group showers the two writers with compliments on their creativity and captivating plot twist. Enthusiasm circulates through the room as the pair of writers basks in their success. The air drips with positivity. As the buzz continues, the next duo props up their iPads in anticipation of their turn to read. The chatter eventually quiets and the dozens of women return to their relaxed state on the comfortable, tweed sofas and lounge chairs that create a cozy perimeter for this writers' circle--the Riyadh Writing Club.

Dressed mostly in blue jeans and loose blouses, these Saudi youth could pass for any group of talented high school and college students in the United States with a passion for poetry and prose. Yet, they are sitting in the basement den of a house in the middle of Riyadh, the conservative capital of Saudi Arabia. There are various clues: bowls of dates placed on end tables and the monstrous coat rack of abayas--the long, thin black cloaks that women are required to wear-- resting in the doorway. If it weren't for those two reminders in the room, I would forget where I was. I could easily be in a newly built villa in the heart of L.A. Just around the corner from the couches is an indoor swimming pool. A dry, warm breeze wafts through the doorway every time someone enters the secret lair.

At that point, I am hooked. I sit on the edge of my chair, eager for the next story. The 30 or so members voted on the theme "wanderlust" in their previous meeting. Each poem or short story (no more than 1,500 words, please) must include "wanderlust" somewhere in the text.
The storylines range from death to unrequited love. Others take a less literal approach of "wander" and "lust" and deal with bipolar family members while another discusses literature and the art of writing.

Each member is required to read her piece out loud to the group. The young women narrate their stories from laptops, smart phones, iPads, and old-fashioned paper. They respond in unique ways after they read. Some transform from tense, controlled body language into a huge smile of relief. Some slap high fives. Others hug. One or two shrug back into a chair and become red with embarrassment.

The strict rules of the club demand that no pieces be shared with each other beforehand. Also, if a member is more than 30 minutes late (a typical "on time" by Saudi cultural standards), she gets a strike. Three strikes and you're out.

Other rules include zero tolerance for plagiarism and incomplete pieces. "Good grammar is a must," according to the club's bylaws. Rudeness is outlawed and only constructive criticism is allowed. Finally, writing activities are not a contest. "Competitiveness will be a problem," the rules state.

The rules clearly work because the living room feels relaxed, safe. Timid teens open up. I am sitting next to a Palestinian member of the group who admits her initial anxiety. She thought the group would think differently of her because she wasn't Saudi. She realized her fears were unfounded. In fact, after reading her writing out loud for the first time, she immediately let her guard down.

Another member, who is attending for the very first time, tightly clutches her homemade journal as she witnesses the vulnerability unfolding around her. By the end of the meeting she has loosened her grip. She clearly feels the magic in the room.

I finally ask a few of the members why they don't write on Arabic or Middle Eastern themes, something that has bothered me since I attended their live reading more than a year ago. One young woman, Alla, responds to my question with a head nod. She has a publisher and he encourages her to write about Saudi issues and topics. He says that is the kind of writing that will sell, given her identity as a Saudi female writer.

However, others respond more defensively. One says she comes to these meetings to "escape all that and be imaginative." Another confesses she gets tired of answering questions from Americans about whether Saudis have AC units or ride camels. The third woman states poignantly, "Why should we focus on that when, actually, we aren't any different from other people?"

And that's what this intimate meeting of 30 young Saudi writers of English poetry and prose teaches me: they aren't all that different. They experience love, hurt, and drama just as we all do. The veneer of their pious culture showcases a different reality, but their soulful prose reveals the truth behind closed doors. The act of writing--and sharing that writing--has become a vital conduit for each member's self-awareness. I suddenly start to care less about whether that act is in English or Arabic.

At the end of the meeting, the club's founder, Hala Abdullah, initiates the conversation about what the next one-word theme should be. Members shout out possibilities:

"HERE."

"POISON."

"BA TTLE."

"MYTH."

After some sideline conversations and quiet protests, all of those suggestions are voted down.

"What about SPEAK?" Hala asks.

A quiet stir of agreement spreads. After a quick unanimous vote of hands, it is officially decided: SPEAK.

The meeting ends, a few more sticky dates are gobbled down, and the young women start chatting in Arabic. One by one, they cover themselves in their black abayas, hide their hair in headscarves and hurry out to their idling drivers.

(To read the poetry and prose of the Riyadh Writing Club, click here.)

New Classical Sounds: Bach and Lully

$
0
0
2014-02-16-BachFreiburgers.jpg

Bach: Brandenburg Concertos Nos.1-6
Freiburger Barockorchester
Harmonia Mundi 2 CDs



Brandenburg Concertos may come and go, but when one of exceptional merit shows up, it is time to remember the many glories of the music and the times that were spent in listening to them, again and again.

Thanks to my pioneering father, I grew up listening to a chamber orchestra version by the Cento Soli Orchestra of Paris, conducted by Hermann Scherchen, with a real harpsichord (Ruggero Gerlin) on an obscure French label named Omega. It was sturdy and colorful and chugged endearingly along.

This new set from the leading edge Baroque Orchestra of Freiburg is considerably more expert, and more au courant in terms of the sophistication and knowledge that backs the way they play their instruments and put the music together interpretively.

It is a light, fleet-fingered, deftly bowed and bow-on reading which has enough plasticity in its phrase shaping and enough, at least occasional, uncertainties about what will happen next (particularly in the wonderful harpsichord cadenza in the Fifth). The music comes to life, even if, after listening for the whole two CDs worth, it begins to sound suspiciously like one long, admittedly delicious Bachian fabric, rather than, in any significant sense, the outward, six different concertos. Playing these splendid performance/recordings loud helps avoid this side effect (perhaps more accurately put, a side affect).

2014-02-16-LullyPhaeton.jpg

Lully: Phaëton
Christophe Rousset, Les Talens Lyriques
Aparté 2 CDs



If you are a Lully fan, then you may be the first I have ever met. Not that Lully is a forbidden pleasure that causes Lullians to shun the light, but since I started encountering classical music types, I have never met a Lullian, or even discussed Lully seriously except at summer festival parties, when the mention of his name raises eyebrows and knowing snickers.

Not a problem. It is just conceivable that if a concerted effort is made now on his behalf, and a vogue created for the forms in which he principally wrote (sacred music, ballets de cour, theatrical music and quasi-operatic grand tragic tableaux), a vogue for Lully, if not a rage much less a commemorative rave, cannot be entirely ruled out for to mark the 400th anniversary of his birthday in 2032. With only 18 years to go, getting to know him and his music should be put on the front burner.

Luckily, Christophe Rousset and Les Talens Lyriques, perhaps smelling the scent, and having dispatched Lully's Bellerophon for the same label in 2011, are on the spot with their new Phaëton, the eighth tragédie lyrique Lully wrote with his pal the librettist Philippe Quinault.

First performed in 1683, Phaëton proved so popular that it was referred to as the ''opera of the people.'' As Christophe Rousset puts it, "Its airs were whistled at Versailles and on the bridges of Paris." And the final terrible scene retains its spectacular power.

Together, a brilliant cast headed by Emiliano Gonzalez Toro as Phaëton, Cyril Auvity playing three roles including Phaëton's father, the wonderful playing of the Talens lyriques and the singing of the Chœur de chambre de Namur rise to the level of Lully's grand inspiration and create a riveting thread of outwardly formal, inwardly deeply personal and affecting human drama. Gorgeous sound and sumptuous book style packaging with lavish full-color illustrations. Yum!

2014-02-16-BachWTC2Rousset.jpg

Bach: The Well-Tempered Clavier Vol.2
Christophe Rousset
Aparté 2 CDs



Over the course of his career, Christophe Rousset has consistently excelled in the integrity of his explorations, first as a harpsichordist and then as director of Les Talens Lyriques. Now firmly established on the Aparté label, after having been a Decca mainstay for many years (my fondest memory is of a Marin Marais recording he did with Christophe Coin called Suite d'un goût étranger), Rousset moves into the big leagues with the second book of Bach's Well-Tempered Clavier.

Written 20 years after the more well-known first book, and "stretching the limits of the possible," as Rousset writes in his booklet-note, WTC 2 may never be really jolly music, but listening to performance so authentically introspective is an awesome reminder of how much there is in its musical depths combined with a kind of wonder at how Bach was able to comprehend and convey so much beauty with such ordinary means.

Playing on a 1628 Ruckers harpsichord which has been preserved in the Chateau de Versailles since 1946, Rousset links the ordinary to the sublime in this musical Everest of its time. He is master of the diversity of styles which Bach calls forth, and of the miraculous touch needed to create the miraculous sounds.

In the interstices of these preludes and fugues, Bach is taking obvious joy mixed with humility at being able to command the forces of music; at some level he must have realized that he was a Prospero. The effect is always touching and sometimes grand, and foursquare too, as if Bach, by plotting the time and distance of musical eternity, were speaking to our human souls.

Scott Diament: From Bagel Boy to Emperor of the Fair

$
0
0
2014-03-11-IMG_7126.JPG

McCall Fine Art at the Palm Beach Jewelry, Art & Antique Show



2014-03-11-IMG_7171.JPG

William Cook Antiques at the Palm Beach Jewelry, Art & Antique Show



"There's never been a company like this company, built like this company.... I really believe that over the years it is going to be a legitimate competitor to the major auction houses. The Palm Beach Show Group will be up there when you talk about where you buy antiques: 'I buy at Sotheby's, I buy at Christie's and I buy at the Palm Beach Show Group'." -Scott Diament

2014-03-11-ima_scott_diament.jpg



In just eleven years, businessman/gemologist/entrepreneur Scott Diament has become the reigning emperor of high end fairs, the owner and operator of ten fine art, antique and jewelry fairs in the United States, all featuring distinguished international exhibitors. Each year, hundreds of thousands of people attend, hundreds of millions of dollars change hands.

In January, I witnessed Diament cleverly move the pathway to the exit of the Los Angeles Art Show, his only fair that is primarily contemporary art based, past the booths of his adjoining jewelry show, thereby shepherding art patrons through the lavish jewelry display when they finished art admiring. Over 60,000 attended that four-day event at the downtown Convention Center.

At the Palm Beach Jewelry, Art & Antique Show in February, I watched the installation of a myriad of temporary partition walls in grey, blue, beige, peach, mauve and white and observed Diament calmly and with great finesse, handle (I'm sure the usual) complaints about lighting, booth size and placement, and some exhibitors missing planes due to northern snowstorms. This is a man who excels at conflict resolution and is a seasoned schmoozer. I saw him, the father of two young boys, personally test a stroller, helping an Australian vender stabilize it for her child. He directed the construction team, requesting that two men carry a pole rather than one. He greeted exhibitors as items arrived at their booths including a painting by Jean Dufy, an art nouveau Lalique pendent, shining blades from turbine jets, lacquered Asian boxes, Persian rugs, 18th century Swedish armchairs, and fifty million year old fossils. Every possible space on the Palm Beach County Convention Center floor had been requisitioned. Procul Harum's "Whiter Shade of Pale' was playing, competing with deafening drills and electric saws. All would be immaculate the next night at the private preview party, as champagne and hors d'oeuvres were served to elite collectors.

2014-03-11-132501_cropped_DS.jpg

Jean Dufy: 'La Passerelle des Arts', circa 1955, oil on canvas, 13x16 inches
Childs Gallery



2014-03-11-destroyerhires.jpg

'Destroyer Hires', Hatchwell Antiques



2014-03-11-F5373169A07E8555SHEKARLOO99X14_HiRez.jpg

'Magma' by Bahram Shabahang, hand-knotted pure wool carpet, 10'x14'
Orley Shabahang Carpets



Many of Diament's exhibitors are regulars. Miami estate jewelry dealer Steven Neckman told me that he has shown at almost all of Diament's shows in various cities since the first Palm Beach fair eleven years ago. Diament explains that he deals with, "1500 exhibitors at our events....and thousands of moving pieces!" In South Florida, he maintains 25,000 square feet of storage space holding complete wall systems, carpeting, and lighting. Enormous trailers are also part of his holdings.

2014-03-11-IMG_0078.jpg

Steven Neckman Diamond and Estate Jewelry
Signed Van Cleef & Arpels black and white pearl necklace with floral coral clasp and diamonds



Scott Diament has always been an entrepreneur. As a 12 year old, he was delivering bagels in the Bronx, earning some $250 a week. At 14, he sold the bagel business to another kid for $5,000.

Despite his name, the Polish word for "diamond", the New York born and Palm Beach dwelling Diament is not from a family of jewelers. He says, "I met someone in college, Robert Samuels, who is my business partner in these events and he had been in the diamond business in Miami and he asked me if I wanted to go into business with him and his father."

After opening the first Provident Jewelry store in West Palm Beach (with Samuels) in 1993, while still a gemology student at G.I.A., Diament began attending jewelry fairs and he and Samuels soon became exhibitors. They eventually opened six Florida jewelers. And started collecting fairs in 2004.

Scott Diament says he slept in hotels 138 nights of the last year, and a hotel in Chicago will receive Diament this April. It will be the first year for the Chicago International Art, Jewelry and Antique Show at the Navy Pier. Diament had sought to purchase an established fair that took place annually at the Merchandise Mart, but was turned down. Undeterred, he hired that show's manager of ten years and began his own fair at the Pier, Chicago's top tourist attraction. "It seems like I am starting from scratch there, but I'm not..... I got dealers to come over. The overlap with that show can be 60 percent." The older fair has now been cancelled.

Diament has also bought New York's long running fall season-opening show at the Park Avenue Armory, previously known as the 'AVENUE'. He says, "I renamed it. 'The New York Art, Antique and Jewelry Show'. And that's a big difference because there is no 'New York' show.....I'm putting in a mix of European exhibitors, American exhibitors and Asian exhibitors. That's really the key, those three constituencies. That does not exist in NY. There's the Haughton International Fair which gears European, the Winter Show which gears towards American, there are Asian shows." He adds, "I'm 99 percent set to have Le Cirque do a restaurant there, " to provide fine dining for his collectors.

I had watched some of the 2012 British TV series 'Dealers', where Scott Diament and four other experts bid against one another for various valuables and I saw him best others in competition for such items as a meteor rock from Argentina (he has been offered three times what he paid), and a vintage Chanel parure, for which he outbid a castmate by 50 pence in a hard negotiation. "I sold them to a buyer in New York and made 80 percent," he says with a smile.

I ask Diament to come up with a short description for the multiple fair venues that are part of the Palm Beach Show Group in terms of marketplace and atmosphere:

Palm Beach: "Affluent, exclusive, exciting."
2014-03-11-FrankenthalerGeisha.jpeg

'Geisha', by Helen Frankenthaler, 2003, Long-Sharp Gallery
hand signed edition of 50, color Ukiyo-e woodcut on Torinoko paper, Pace Prints



Baltimore: "A long history of collecting, hundreds of years."
2014-03-11-JeffreyTillou1.jpg

Queen Anne Flat Top Highboy, ca. 1770, Jeffrey Tillou Antiques



Dallas: "Everything's big in Dallas. Multi national corporations. Growing. Dallas has spent more on their performing arts center than any other place in the world."
2014-03-11-RoyalBlueDiamond.jpg

The Royal Blue Diamond, M.S. Rau Antiques
10.06-carat Natural fancy, the finest blue diamond on the market today



Naples: "Seaside elegance. Filled with mid-westerners. There are more retired CEO's of fortune 500 companies in Naples, Florida than in any other city."
2014-03-11-IMG_7122.JPG

A 50 year old fossil mural from Wyoming, 60"x84"X2.75deep, 340 lbs

Gallery of Amazing Things



Los Angeles: "Young, vibrant, dynamic, exciting, trend-setting. I see Los Angeles as the culture-forming city of the planet earth."
2014-03-11-LinPengHighwayimpression2013Oiloncanvas120X80cm.jpg

Hues of China: Lin Peng Highway Impression, 2013, oil on canvas


Chicago: "It's always been a great collecting city, great architectural city. They love furnishings, design, jewelry. It's only second to NY for collectors."
2014-03-11-47444_10151523328653438_1666390035_n.jpg

Navy Pier



New York: "There's only two places in the world at the pinnacle of art, antiques and jewelry shows and that's NY and London. There may be another in the future, maybe Hong Kong or Shanghai."
2014-03-11-ParkAvenueArmory1.jpg

Park Ave Armory



Diament has started CollectorsNet.com. "It's a dot com company I created to help the dealers that participate in my events. To me, it seemed very logical that someone who likes the event would like an online version of the event. It's not the same but it allows you to index and research the items. ....I think it's up to somewhere around 10,000 hits per month. It's still developing. I advertise it basically in everything."

2014-03-11-WEBBSTITCHBANGLELARGE.JPG

David Webb yellow gold, jade, blue enamel and diamond necklace, ca. 1970
Camilla Dietz Bergeron Ltd.



And he continues to expand, looking into other American cities, and is taking meetings in the Shanghai Free Trade Zone. Of his ten current shows, he says, "At the moment, they are not all profitable as individual stand alones, but overall the Show company is doing quite considerably. It really is the largest. The idea is to create this connected network that follows you from show to show to show."

2014-03-11-_DSC51012_DK.jpg

Polychrome Stucco Figure of a Warrior as a Crouching Jaguar (ca.250AD-600AD)
Collection of the future Museo Maya de America, Guatemala
Treasure of the Maya Spirit exhibition at the Los Angeles Jewelry Antique & Design Show



He notes, "There are three main components to a successful show. There's entertainment, so the opening night is about entertainment. It's about first look, exclusivity and entertainment. The second thing I believe all shows have to have is a cultural aspect, something akin to a museum. They have to spread culture amongst the people that come to visit. And the third thing it needs is economical investment. If it doesn't have an economic basis of being, if things aren't sold and investments aren't made, then it fails."

2014-03-11-_MG_93722.jpg

Scott Daiment with Philanthropist Audrey Gruss, Palm Beach Jewelry, Art & Antique Show



http://palmbeachshowgroup.com/
http://www.collectorsnet.com/

Chicago International Art, Antique & Jewelry Show (April 24-28, 2014)
Baltimore Summer Antiques Show (August 21-24, 2014)
New York Art, Antique & Jewelry Show (September 17-21, 2014)
Palm Beach Jewelry & Watch Show (November 13-16, 2014)
Dallas International Art, Antique & Jewelry Show (November 6-10, 2014, 2013)
LA Art Show (January 14-18, 2015)
Los Angeles Antique, Jewelry & Design Show (January 14-18, 2015)
Naples Art, Antique & Jewelry Show (February 5 -9, 2015)
Palm Beach Jewelry, Art & Antique Show (February 13-17, 2015)

Working With Ideas and Making Them Realized

$
0
0
Blinded by skepticism, doubt and fear, people quickly give up on their dreams and don't take risks. Now, for me, what started out as a spontaneous idea became one of my biggest accomplishments. Sure, there were bumps along the way, but if I had stopped at the very first lump on the road, I'm not sure if I could have ever made this journey.

Just over a year ago, an idea popped into my head as I flipped through Direct's 19th issue, one of my favorite art magazines. On the spot, I decided to create one of my own. Though I'm not entirely sure how I came up with this project, the first thing that hit me was the possibility of failing as I not only lacked resources, plans and support for this project. When I took a moment to ruminate on these lacking essentials, I was devastated by the thought that my idea might abruptly come to an end. But there was one thing clearly imprinted in my head: ideas are fragile and delicate in their infancies. These words are similar to what Sara Blakely, the founder of Spanx, said when she was interviewed about her success. From that moment, I realized that it was my job to keep on pushing and developing, rather than quitting.

I researched for months before I was able to formulate a solid plan that could further my idea and produce desirable results. I read piles and piles of magazines; I studied their structures, templates and organization. In my free time, I visited different galleries and local exhibitions both offline and online, hoping to get some sort of support and advice. I never realized until then that there were so many fascinating and interesting communities out there who were willing to help. I met graffiti artists, who specialized in creating hypnotic vortexes; photographers, who captured moments that reflect their personal thoughts and philosophies; designers and painters, who allowed their wildest imaginations to roam freely on their canvases. They ultimately became the "base" for my art magazine. From here, I learned that if you persist, search and stay encouraged, you are bound to discover something. And what you stumble upon can be your source of passion, motivation, support and a platform that could allow you to plant the seeds of ideas. Not all communities will be welcoming, but don't give up; use them to the best of your abilities and advantage.

Finally, be prepared and take care! When I was designing the layout of the magazine, I experienced perfectionism for the very first time. I had my art teacher partially involved in this task, and he would always point out something to correct: "the texts are incorrectly aligned" or "these two pictures must be center to each other." The whole process was demanding and repetitive, yet eye-opening. After draft after draft, I realized that this entire process was not an easy task, contrary to what I had initially thought. Every step of making an idea realized requires hard work, persistence, patience and control.

Although my final product, which began with a single idea, is still far from being perfect and has room for improvement, I value the hard work and lots of hours that I've invested in it. Treasuring what you have accomplished so far can be the beginning of something even greater because it motivates you to move forward. Love, care and value your plans, ideas and small achievements. And don't stop when you are done because it is just the beginning.

Check out my art magazine! Explore what this idea was all about: http://issuu.com/expressartmagazine/docs/express_magazine__1

Rock 'n' Roll, the '70s and a Camera

$
0
0

2014-03-14-2.jpg


DOG DANCE. Upper-case, not lower-case. That's an important take-away from the front cover. Bold, sexual and candid. The book immediately tells you what you're about to witness. Full disclosure: I did not live through the '70s, but the life of Rock 'n' Roll and the '70s live in this book. After reading DOG DANCE, I can say that I feel a bit nostalgic which is hard for me to say since I've never really seen any of these artists live.



As a music photographer, one cannot help but wish you lived through the beginnings of Rock n' Roll. Led Zeppelin, The Runaways, The Ramones and The Beatles are just some of Brad Elterman's subjects in this book. One can argue that these artists paved the way for any and all music produced afterwards. And there's no question that Elterman catches history in every photograph in the book.

Elterman's photographs capture a very unique moment and he has a story for every frame. Though I read the book in one sitting, I found myself going back and reading it every day. It is not your typical music photography book -- it's history. Kids should be reading and referencing it in their music class. Teachers should be telling these stories.

One of my favorite stories that Brad once shared with me is about his Bob Dylan and Robert DeNiro photograph. He was asked to come up stairs of a nightclub to take a photograph of Dylan and a young actor. That young actor happened to be Robert DeNiro. Elterman shared with me that he had no idea who this actor was at the time nor did America.

You're going to feel either two things after reading DOG DANCE: One, I miss those days. Two, I wish I lived during those days. I feel the latter.

What's next for Brad Elterman? He's currently directing a short film based on his life as a teenage photographer. Keep an eye out for updates!

2014-03-14-1.jpg

SXSW Film: Damnation, a Documentary That's Testing the Waters of Corporate Social Responsibility

$
0
0
In 1935, FDR promoted the building of dams and this grew to include over 75,000 dams standing more than 3 feet tall throughout the United States. Many of these dams have outlived their usefulness, and many caused great damage to ecosystems and fish, especially salmon. The response to this for some has been civil disobedience and acts of environmental activism, which include painting huge cracks and scissors on the dams themselves, at great physical and legal risk to the members of groups such as Earth First. There is one particular CEO and company founder, who stands on the side of the environmentalists and puts his money where his mouth is by supporting civil democracy through action.

Yvon Chouinard's company, Patagonia, and his philosophy and commitment to environmentalism is directly linked to why his company exists. The very name of his company comes from a trip he took to Chile's Patagonia decades ago, a place which he still works to protect today. This commitment has now helped to produce a feature documentary, shown this week at SXSW in Austin, entitled, Damnation. Through the use of beautiful cinematography and authenticity on several levels, it educates the audience in a powerfully moving way. I came away from this film feeling I had truly learned something and that I was not being "sold" anything, yet the fact that the film was entirely supported by a "brand," Patagonia, left me intrigued.

During the panel discussion following the film, Yvon Chouniard, along with one of the filmmakers, the head of Patagonia's marketing and Vimeo's representative, all came together to tell the story of how this film is establishing an outside the box approach to both producing and distributing a film with a strong environmental message.

Firstly, it is stunning in the way it is filmed. The filmmakers were approached by Chouinard, and the scientific advisor, because of their previous works focusing on fishing. Included in the film is a member of Earth First, who painted cracks on dams which no longer served their purpose and which were in fact doing harm in various ways to the environment, specifically to salmon and fishes which once thrived in the rivers prior to the dams being built.

The US is actually now leading the way in dam removal, and the film focuses not only on what has been lost, at a price of millions of dollars, but also on how quickly the natural habitat and fish return once the dams are removed.

Gorgeous archives of the predam days, especially those of environmental activists Katie Lee, naked amongst the caverns and cliffs, which will soon be flooded, and her outspoken stance on freeing the rivers, made the film for me. Earth First activist, Mikal Jakubal also makes an appearance or two and is a delight to watch as he joyfully depicts close encounters with the law.

But as I watched the film, I never once thought of the brand, the company behind the film. Yet the fact that Patagonia would give creative freedom to the filmmakers, and the fact that those included in the making of the film are authentically engaged in hard-core environmental activism, made the story not only poignant, but I became convinced that their message was one that needs to be spread.

I had never thought much about dams and imagined they had been built to generate hydropower, which was necessary. I had no idea that tens of thousands of dams were built across the US and was somewhat ignorant about their extremely damaging impact on so many native communities and salmon. I had lived in the Pacific Northwest during Earth First's most active days and had heard about fish ladders and hatcheries, and had driven by a few huge dams, but I never had imagined how the still waters killed so much life when dams were put in place.

The filmmakers interview Native Americans whose spiritual and day-to-day lives are tied to the salmon, which have virtually disappeared. They interviewed a farmer who almost began to cry as he spoke of the beauty of the rivers coming back and the damage the dams had done. They filmed guerilla acts of environmental activism. And managed to capture the removal of a dam with dynamite. Damnation portrays the fictional "Monkey Wrench Gang" coming to life as we enter into the mindset of those who can no longer sit back and watch the planet and the rivers be destroyed. This, along with archival footage of other dams being blown up and removed, was juxtaposed with footage of the rivers flowing wildly and coming back to life.

When asked about why he wanted to back such a documentary, Yvon Chouinard said very seriously, "Propaganda." He felt that there had been so much disinformation about why dams were needed that it was important to counter that with images and information, which told the truth. When I asked him what he thought about other company CEOs and founders who claim to be socially responsible, he replied, "The elephant in the room is growth. We cannot just continue to grow and grow." When asked specifically about Patagonia, he responded, "Actually everyone should wear used clothes and then hand them down when done with them." This response is astonishing in itself for someone who has become successful selling sporting and outdoors clothes. But Choiunard is highly respected by fellow CEOs and his philosophy and book on how he began Patagonia is used in business schools across the US.

To me this did not feel like "branded" content and the filmmakers only agreed to take on the subject if they could have final cut and complete freedom to tell the story in an authentic way. Chouinard and Patgonia gave them that. But what is highly impactful is that Patagonia's stores and marketing architecture allow for the film to be released and distributed in a highly unusual way. There will be screenings in the stores, DVDs will be sold there and special interest and educational screenings will be held with NGOs and schools to spread the message about the importance of dam removal. Vimeo will also screen it on demand and it will be part of curated content, which will help audiences find films such as Damnation, which have environmental themes. A petition will be sent to President Obama to support the eradication of more unnecessary dams.

The film's message thus leads the audience to a call for action, but it also made me think a lot about the power that CEOs and companies have to do good. Sadly, not enough of them have such an authentically committed founder. Perhaps that should be a film in itself, the philosophy of those who do put their money where their mouth is and take action to support creative works, which educate us and help to make this world a better place. That is real impact. That is true activism. And Yvon Chouinard's life and work are directly tied to both.

How can you not trust a man, a CEO of a clothes company, who tells you to help save the Earth by buying and wearing used clothes and handing them down? At the screening of Damnation, I looked around and saw numerous Patagonia jackets on audience members, for the most part; the clothing was well worn and much loved.

www.damnationfilm.com DamNation is produced by Patagonia in association with a Stoecker Ecological & Felt Soul Media Production and is set for theatrical release in select cities beginning in April. Directed by Ben Knight and Travis Rummel. Produced by Matt Stoecker and Travis RummelExecutive Producer: Yvon Chouinard.

Notes From the Road: Las Vegas and Beyond

$
0
0
Don Bacigalupi, President of Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art, and Chad Alligood, Assistant Curator of Special Projects, have been traveling around the United States for the better part of the past year, visiting artists in every region of the country in preparation for the exhibition State of the Art: Discovering American Art Now, which will open at Crystal Bridges in September. As of this moment, they have visited some 700 artists. Chad stopped in the Museum offices this week long enough to answer a few questions and to provide some insights into what discoveries they are making on the road.

So, having been to nearly 700 artist studios at this point, what themes are you seeing arise?

That's a common question. It's no surprise that artists are engaging with themes that directly impact our world and our everyday lives -- and those run the gamut from things that are explicitly political, in a way, like the environment or the distribution of wealth in this country, or the state of the economy. Those things percolate up. And they percolate up differently in different parts of the country. But then there are other themes that arise, too...

2014-03-14-LasVegassunset.jpgFor instance, I was recently in Las Vegas, and Vegas, more than any other place, seemed to me to be really responsive to the local context. Las Vegas has such a rich visual and metaphorical terrain that artists can't help, but respond. So, they're making things that are obsessed with surface, that are interested in the multiplication and duplication of imagery, that are interested in ideas of excess and ornament and decoration: impermanence, dynamic change. These are all themes that bubble through this community of artists in completely divergent ways, so this fabric of the city becomes filtered through these individual practices...[resulting in works such as] a lacquered bug on the wall, or a huge piñata sculpture, or quiet obsessive drawings of surfaces. These are all disparate practices, right? But they are filtered through these individual people that are responding to the same stimuli.

So, on a micro scale that reflects what's going on in other parts of the country, because everywhere people are responding to their local communities and environments in unique ways.

How have you been received by the artists you have visited?

2014-03-14-Studiomaterials.jpgIt's interesting to see the ways in which the perception of the project has evolved over time. In the beginning, Don and I would show up and [some] people didn't have a clear idea of what Crystal Bridges was or who we were. There was no press, there was nothing out there [about the exhibition] for them to Google before we got there. And so they just approached it like any other studio visit.

As the project has gained momentum and people have started to talk [about State of the Art], we've encountered a deep appreciation, understanding, and respect for this project that we've launched. People across the country thank us: "Thank you for doing this work, because no one else is doing it." And that sense that what we are doing is resonating, not only with the artists themselves, but with the other nodes of the art community -- the local gallerists, the people who manage artist-run spaces, the art educators, the academics -- those other members of the community who also advocate for artists and what they do. It's been really galvanizing and encouraging to see the ways that they're responding.

--

State of the Art: Discovering American Art Now will showcase the work of more than 100 artists from every region of the United States and will offer an unusually diverse and nuanced look at today's American culture. The goal of the exhibition is to inspire conversation, broaden perspective, and facilitate dialogue on the issues most important to us -- as a nation, as artists, and as a world.

About Motivation

$
0
0
2014-03-14-DSCN1360.JPG
The Temple of Dendur in The Sackler Wing before a performance. Photo Courtesy of MMA.

Fear is a great motivator. It gets us out of bed in the morning, it bathes us in adrenaline, and helps keep us on task and grounded. In moderation, fear can be our friend. But fear-based motivation, in the long run, gets toxic and counter-productive. It stunts our growth; keeps us in unhealthy relationships; shrinks our world. In the classical music world, fear often gets top billing as the primary driver of programming. So much of classical music programming, live and on the air/web, is fear-based. Programs are religiously kept within some arbitrary boundaries of time and geography, as if the programmers are afraid of tripping some wire, which will then cause, what? Loss of audiences? (Cue laugh track.) Market share? (Cue louder laugh track.)

Fear's first cousin is Set-It-n-Forget-It. SInFI is powerful. And because it wields quantitative data, it speaks in an incredibly persuasive voice: "Hey, this program worked last year, and the year before that, and 10 years before that. Why even question it?" SInFI rules classical radio, for example, because it's measurable. Public radio can tell you exactly how many membership dollars a poor, DOA Smetana trifle is worth, or some 19th century adagio, as opposed to an equally dreamy, but unfamiliar adagio by, say, Jennifer Higdon.

If It Ain't Broke, Why Fix It is SInFI's younger sibling. Not quite as sure of itself, but equally corrosive. It's not as measurable as SInFI, but it holds the upper hand of making intuitive sense. It carries within it the built-in assumption that applying change, like applying pressure, may break something.

2014-03-14-1Twinned.jpg
Conductor Alan Pierson leading Alarm Will Sound at the Met Museum. Photo by Rebecca Greenfield.

When planning a new performance season for the Met Museum, I try to reject fear and its extended family. The main motivation for me, first and foremost, is curiosity. Also a comfort level with the artistic imagination. I have a high tolerance for complexity and for non-linear planning practices. To tell the story of an iconic gallery, or interpret and explore an exhibition through performance requires constant experimentation. The opposite of fear is not just courage, it is also confidence, and a willingness to trust. Trust the performers to create work that has resonance and meaning; trust the audience that they will be curious enough to come; trust the curators that they'll embrace the collaboration. Armed with an awareness of your space, your audience, your city, the imagination has room to play.

With this freedom comes complications. For example: how do you tell the story of The Temple of Dendur through the imagination of a composer and a librettist? In I Was Here I Was I, a new opera commissioned by the Met Museum for the ensemble Alarm Will Sound, the librettist/director Nigel Maister and composer Kate Soper were charged with creating an original work that illuminates (literally and metaphorically) this extraordinary work of architecture and art -- an artifact two millennia old, which embodies so much of the unfathomable miracle that is the Met's collections.

Here's what the facts are: The Temple of Dendur, dating, we think, from 15 B.C., travelled to New York from Dendur, Nubia (Egypt), 50 miles from the Aswan Dam, is made from Aeolian sandstone, and is covered in extraordinarily beautiful images (as well as centuries of visitors' names).

2014-03-14-3Twinned.jpg
Twinned in The Charles Engelhard Court. Photo by Rebecca Greenfield.

This is where knowledge stops and imagination comes in. What compelled the Nubians to build this amazing temple? What drove centuries of visitors to memorialize their encounter? What does it mean, for a 21st-century tourist, to behold the temple?

On June 20, we will have an opportunity to look at the temple through the artistic imagination of Nigel and Kate. Risky? Sure. New? Yup. Complicated? Also yes. But really, what choice is there, for a place as vital and essential as the Met?

Kandinsky on Creativity

$
0
0

In 1916, in an essay vaguely titled "On the Artist," the painter Wassily Kandinsky provided a precise and thorough analysis of the difference between conceptual and experimental artists.



Proposing to provide clarity in a turbulent time for art, Kandinsky pointed out that the common distinction between "modern" and "old-fashioned" artists was not a useful one, because the division changed with every new fad. He argued that what was needed was an enduring taxonomy, based on the recognition that "through the whole history of art two kinds of talents and two different missions are simultaneously at work."








2014-03-15-VassilyKandinsky1.jpeg

Kandinsky in 1913. All images courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.


Kandinsky's fundamental distinction was between virtuoso artists and creative artists. The former was facile and protean:



The virtuoso has a brilliant, versatile talent that is extremely sensitive to every impression, reacts very strongly to everything beautiful, and with the greatest skill and ease develops in many directions -- often completely different, sometimes contradictory.


The virtuoso's art was based on imitation:



Unable to create in isolation, he needs outside influence...The virtuosos form "schools"...Such artists are like starlings who do not know a song of their own, but imitate more or less well that of the nightingale.







2014-03-15-Wassily_Kandinsky_1908_Murnau_Dorfstrasse_A_Village_Street_oil_on_cardboard_later_mounted_on_wood_panel_48_x_69.5_cm_The_Merzbacher_collection_Sw2.jpg

A Village Street (1908). All works by Wassily Kandinsky.


In contrast, the creative artist was a single-minded individualist who matured slowly:



The creative artist comes into the world with his own soul's dream. The justification for his existence is the materialization of this dream. His whole talent exists merely for this goal alone. Therefore, it is stubborn, seemingly unpliable, adverse to impressions, does not let itself be carried away by the trends of the day, stands apart, is misunderstood and underestimated, and is initially overlooked. Such artists are often bad students in school, do not want to obey the teachers, often fail their exams, and are considered less talented even by their friends. They see other art and everything else around them with their own eyes. When they speak with the help of nature, they do so in their own way, and even here cannot conform to the currently accepted "correct principle." Thus, in the beginning of their careers and often for many, many years, they are considered "second class" artists.







2014-03-15-800pxKandinsky__Composition_VI_19132.jpg

Composition VI (1913).


But the creative artist persevered, and slowly achieved greatness:



The creator of the new walks straight ahead on his own difficult path. When later on the art historian looks back at the artist's career, he sees a straight line. He sees that from the beginning the line and the color remain the same, and that during the course of the work they develop, purify, concentrate, and are brought to perfection.


It is clear that Kandinsky's brilliant, versatile, protean, precocious, imitative and ultimately superficial virtuoso is the artist I have called conceptual, while his stubborn, individualistic, single-minded, persistent, original, late blooming and eventually triumphant creative artist is the experimental innovator. Kandinsky did not categorize individual artists in this 1916 article, but it is not difficult to infer some of his assignments from earlier writings. So for example in his celebrated book of 1912, On the Spiritual in Art, he described Cézanne as "the seeker after new laws of form," who had "the gift of seeing inner life everywhere." In contrast, he described Picasso as "led on always by the need for self-expression, often driven wildly onward," making frequent abrupt and radical changes of style that baffled even his "incredibly numerous followers."









2014-03-15-Kandinsky_WWI1.jpg

Composition VII (1913).


In 1916, the experimental Kandinsky was living in Russia, where he was overshadowed by the conceptual Kazimir Malevich and his many followers, and it is not difficult to see his comment that virtuosos formed schools as a bitter reference to Suprematism. He would later complain to an interviewer that in Moscow paintings were being made in laboratories.



Although he clearly felt neglected, Kandinsky consoled himself in 1916 with the thought that his achievement in pioneering a meaningful and beautiful form of experimental non-representational art would ultimately be greater than that of the very different form of conceptual abstraction created by the more protean and flamboyant Malevich. Thus he concluded that the creative artist "will still realize his dream in one way or another, as long as the dream remains alive within him. Thus unlike the virtuoso, he needs inner development."

Theater LBJ (Almost) All The Way; Hand To God It's Funny

$
0
0
ALL THE WAY **1/2 out of ****
HAND TO GOD *** out of ****


ALL THE WAY **1/2 out of ****
NEIL SIMON THEATRE

Bryan Cranston should have been showered with Emmys for his hilarious turn as the dim-witted but lovable dad on Malcolm In The Middle. But it took meth to turn this talented, successful actor into a major draw, one big enough to cause a stampede when he makes his Broadway debut in a sprawling bio-play about the passage of a civil rights bill by President Lyndon Baines Johnson. So thank you Breaking Bad.

Cranston had a string of theatrical credits but it was still unclear how well he would handle centering a big Broadway drama. Those questions dissipate right away. He's not the tall, gangling presence that LBJ was, but with canny casting (a number of other key roles are played by actors who are shorter than him) and Cranston's correct decision to play a character rather than imitate a man, LBJ springs to life here in full lapel-grabbing, arm-twisting glory. Can he hold the stage? You bet.

Playwright Robert Schenkkan's Pulitzer Prize winner The Kentucky Cycle was crushed on Broadway by the massive success of Angels In America. It ran for barely a month. That won't happen here. LBJ likes to win and All The Way looks set to go as long as Cranston wants to keep it going (it's currently a limited run through June) and he'll surely be a front runner for the Tonys.

But is it good? Like almost every other political drama on film or TV, the knee-jerk comment is to compare it to The West Wing, a series that turned politicking (and speechifying) into high drama. Is All The Way about as cogent and entertaining as a typical episode during that show's heyday? Yes. It also has a large, sprawling cast with many actors playing two or three or four roles.

But the push to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is high drama already, one of the titanic struggles in our legislative history. Schenkkan's play manages the difficult trick of presenting the horse-trading and ebb and flow of congressional battle solidly. But what is lost is the complexity of the people involved. LBJ is a darkly complex man but here he is sentimentalized and broadly drawn. Everyone, in fact, is presented in stark, simplistic terms from Martin Luther King to J. Edgar Hoover down to Governor George Wallace (ok, Wallace is pretty simplistic back in the 1960s).

It's fun and Cranston is a blast to watch. But it should be far more compelling and complex.



You know the story. JFK has died, LBJ is taking power and he has about one year before the elections. For various reasons the show doesn't quite plumb, LBJ tackles the Civil Rights Act and the dance begins. A master of Congress, he navigates and compromises and back-stabs and does whatever he has to in order to win. That leads to his first chance at actually being elected President rather than just being an "accidental" one. His campaign climaxes with the brilliant speech where LBJ somehow turns his pushing for civil rights into a slap at Yankees. They said we were racist and play on our fears, but I won't let them, he snarls. It works and doesn't work. Johnson wins the election, of course, but the Democrats essentially lost the South politically for generations to come.

The first and most welcome surprise about All The Way is that it doesn't just revolve around LBJ. Sure, we knew it had a large cast. But the efforts of Dr. Martin Luther King (a fine Brandon J. Dirden) and the many activists and leaders of the struggle for equal rights for blacks) is given full weight here. LBJ and King's dance, with each one prodding and pushing the other in order to advance their own agenda is the best part of this show.

The stage may get crowded at some points, with LBJ holding forth as the bodies of Chaney, Goodman and Schwerner are dug up behind him. And the multi-media stunts feel mostly unnecessary, with Shawn Sagady offering up clips from the era and running totals of vote counts all to little effect except for the scene of Roslyn Ruff testifying to Congress as Fannie Lou Hamer. But at least here is a play where the men and women putting their lives on the line to obtain equal rights don't feel like an afterthought.

But even for them the complexity begins and ends with a brief moment showing King about to cheat on his wife with a white woman. The payoff -- with LBJ chortling over the audio tapes but dismissing the info as unimportant and telling Hoover to back off -- is more telling. Hoover (a fine Michael McKean) is sport for a modest inside joke as LBJ wonders aloud how one can tell if a man is gay and asks Hoover his opinion. William Jackson Harper is fine as the impassioned Stokely Carmichael. Rob Campbell is fine in various roles, including Wallace.

Indeed, everyone is fine but no more than fine because their parts remain so one-note. An exception is made for John McMartin, who brings shadings to Sen. Dick Russell; it's no surprise some of the show's most gripping moments involve he and Cranston squaring off.

But it's rare that Schenkkan's play cuts deep. The show begins curiously with LBJ retelling a story about a distant relative hiding from Comanches as if it happened to him. The play later correctly credits who the story happened to (a great grandmother long before he was born) but how this relates is hard to follow. Later, in a confessional moment spoken directly to the audience, LBJ tells the true story of spending some time teaching dirt poor children in a border town when he was working his way through college. It's presented as a heartfelt declaration of why civil rights might be such a defining issue for him.

Well, I'm grateful that the approach of this play prompted me to tackle Robert Caro's brilliant multi-volume biography of LBJ (I'm not done yet, any more than Caro is). But the downside is that this souful pouring out of emotion feels utterly unauthentic. If there's one thing that drives LBJ, it's winning and principles be damned. As the play makes clear at another point, his father stuck to his principles and it ruined him, made the man a figure of derision in his hometown. LBJ worked for arguably the most conservative Congressman from Texas when he came to Washington and at the same time worked on the campaign of the most radically liberal. He wanted to win! Again and again throughout his life, LBJ played his cards close to the vest, refusing to take a stand on issues even when just an aide. Those closest to him weren't sure what he believed in as he rose, because LBJ would parrot the beliefs of anyone higher up in power as the consummate brownnose he was.

If Schenkkan wanted to portray this as the one noble act, a principled stand no matter the cost action, rather than a political calculation that it could be done and would help him establish himself as his own man outside the shadow of the martyred Kennedy, he needed to do a lot more work. At the very least, it would better reflect the complexities of the man if this story about him teaching the poorest and most vulnerable was told to someone in order to win them over, rather than as a soliloquy to the audience that implied this was "the truth."

Even better, let him use this true story as an anecdote to win a vote and then immediately contrast it with the scene where he baldly says the Democrats can't get away with kowtowing to the Dixiecrats any more just to keep us guessing along with his advisers. (Mind you, that argument was morally right but politically wrong since LBJ did acknowledge passing the legislation crippled the Dems for decades. No Democratic presidential candidate has won a majority of the white male vote since.)

This is all to say that All The Way may be broadly entertaining on one viewing but it doesn't remotely begin to offer any shading or nuance to some remarkably nuanced and complex figures. I'm of two minds about the set of Christopher Acebo. It's dominated by rows of curved seating like in the Congress, with various characters sitting and observing the action of holding forth from their seat. it works just fine, though scenes set in hotel rooms and elsewhere feel a tad awkward. The production design becomes even more cluttered when you've got those rows of seats, the crime scene down south in Mississippi and finally a legislative scene towards the front. What seems at first elegant and simple becomes a little too utilitarian, too all-purpose to make us feel rooted in any particular place and time.

The costumes by Deborah M. Dryden are more specific and convincing, though the wigs and makeup of Paul Huntley sometimes feel the pressure of turning so many actors into so many different figures that the sense of "costume" in those looks remains foremost in the mind. The score by Paul James Prendergast feels as straightforward as the play itself. With so many moving parts, Bill Rauch's work feels more like traffic cop than director, though he avoids collisions and keeps most changes in setting and mood crystal clear.

The LBJ of Schenkkan is not a cartoon. He's just far simpler, more straight-forward, less tortured and driven and fascinatingly contradictory than the real man. But Cranston brings weight and humor to the character he's been given. He tells jokes, strong-arms, barks, wheedles, ignores, sucks up, muses, doubts and blusters and strategizes on and on with gusto until he crosses the finish line. "I'm the President!" he exults at the finale. And you believe him.


HAND TO GOD *** out of ****
MCC THEATRE AT THE LUCILLE LORTEL

Was it really November of 2011 when I last saw this scabrous comedy at the Ensemble Studio Theatre? The show is so fresh in my mind, it might have been last week. Hand To God by Robert Askins has finally made the jump to Off Broadway at MCC and if a show with this strong a hook -- born-again teen tormented by a demonic hand puppet -- and two award-worthy lead performances can't click commercially and enjoy a good run, then we're all going to (theatrical) hell. Certainly any savvy theatergoers will want to check it out. And bold tourists will hopefully venture in to see something they won't find back in Kansas.

Margery (a very good Geneva Carr) is a sad widow trying to find some purpose by dragging her son into a church project: Christian hand puppetry to spread the word. Never mind that she doesn't know the first thing about puppetry; this is what she's decided to do and by gosh Jason (Steven Boyer) is going to support her. The discomfited, awkward Jason feels dumb around the geek-cute Jessica (Sarah Stiles) and the sullen Timothy (Michael Oberholtzer), who is dumped there while his mom attends AA meetings. But that doesn't stop Jason from really getting into the puppetry thing, perhaps because his hand puppet Tyrone lets Jason unleash all the anger, sadness and lust pent up inside him, not to mention asserting himself for a change.

But is Jason that good at puppetry? Or is Tyrone an instrument of the Devil? His puppet mucks up a sweet moment with Jessica, provokes Timothy and gets more and more violent with each passing moment, even refusing to let Jason fall asleep at night by constantly hitting him in the face. But Tyrone and Jason aren't the only ones out of control. Margery firmly rejects a tepid romantic offer from Pastor Greg (Marc Kudisch) but her tamped-down emotions explode when Timothy declares his love. Before he knows what's happening, Timothy is trashing the church meeting room and on the floor, gobbling up pieces of poster at his mistress's command. "Eat it!" she demands.

Actually, this explosively funny moment happens very early, establishing the over-the-top, anything goes vibe that is soon carried even further by Jason's hand puppet from hell. That let's us know he's not the only unhappy camper here and maybe it's not the Devil but just plain old sadness driving these two to extremes.

Act one is pure hilarity. Act two takes a turn to the serious (with still plenty of humor) as the pain these people are feeling bubbles to the surface.



Hand To God is essentially the same play from before, but everything is tighter, sharper and more in focus. The sets by Beowulf Boritt are spot-on, especially in the second-act reveal where we see the vandalism of Jason and Tyrone, a collection of jokes (a crucified Barbie, references to Slayer and the like that keep the audience tittering for minutes as they discover them). The lighting by Jason Lyons and sound by Jill BC Du Boff work in tandem with Steven Boyer to create the perfect, tone-switching atmosphere that allows us to suspend our disbelief whenever satanic Tyrone holds forth.

Director Moritz von Stuelpnagel has clearly used the time to refine his vision of the work. Three of the cast members are new, with Stiles and Kudisch worthy successors. Anyone who saw Bobby Moreno will miss the unbridled relish in which he unleashed his id, but newcomers will find Oberholtzer's more straightforward take on a dumb kid hot for teacher funny on its own.

Happily, both Carr and Boyer remain excellent, despite living with the show for several years and being showered with accolades. Carr has centered her performance more effectively in pain rather than broad comedy and that makes her journey more of an equal to her son's. Boyer is a marvel; he is if anything even more restrained and honest, playing essentially two roles, doing hand puppetry, fighting with himself in a climactic moment and all of it funny, moving and gripping.

The issues I had with Askins' fresh and funny play remain, but don't seem so serious. Perhaps thanks to Kudisch, the pastor doesn't seem quite the villain but more of a real person -- the mom may feel put upon, but he didn't really do anything outrageous by making his desire for a relationship clear. And the pastor is admirably restrained when dealing with an apparently psychotic kid whose mom would prefer an exorcism to a psych ward.

And have they tweaked the big speeches from Tyrone, especially at the end of the play? Either they've been slightly sharpened or Boyer has simply become more masterful in delivering them because they worked better this time around. I'd still prefer no intermission, cutting way back on a puppet sex scene that is funny but drags on far too long and a finale that is more organic (perhaps revolving around Jessica) rather than the violence that tips the scale towards Grand Guignol rather than grumpy teen.

But anyone would be foolish to miss a very funny play that includes vivid writing and two excellent lead performances that will be talked about for the rest of the year. Hand to god, it's one to see.

THEATER OF 2014

Beautiful: The Carole King Musical ***
Rodney King ***
Hard Times ** 1/2
Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Are Dead **
I Could Say More *
The Loneliness Of The Long Distance Runner **
Machinal ***
Outside Mullingar ***
A Man's A Man * 1/2
The Tribute Artist ** 1/2
Transport **
Prince Igor at the Met **
The Bridges Of Madison County ** 1/2
Kung Fu (at Signature) **
Stage Kiss ***
Satchmo At The Waldorf ***
Antony and Cleopatra at the Public **
All The Way ** 1/2
Hand To God ***

Thanks for reading. Michael Giltz is the founder and CEO of the forthcoming websiteBookFilter, a book lover's best friend. It's a website that lets you browse for books online the way you do in a physical bookstore, provides comprehensive info on new releases every week in every category and offers passionate personal recommendations every step of the way. It's like a fall book preview or holiday gift guide -- but every week in every category. He's also the cohost of Showbiz Sandbox, a weekly pop culture podcast that reveals the industry take on entertainment news of the day and features top journalists and opinion makers as guests. It's available for free on iTunes. Visit Michael Giltz at his website and his daily blog. Download his podcast of celebrity interviews and his radio show, also called Popsurfing and also available for free on iTunes.

Note: Michael Giltz is provided with free tickets to shows with the understanding that he will be writing a review. All productions are in New York City unless otherwise indicated.

Memorable One-Night Stands

$
0
0
In rare moments of nostalgia, I miss the good old days of gay bathhouses. The sheer randomness of who you might meet, grope, kiss, or fuck was a never-ending game of chance. Wandering through a dimly-lit maze, a hand might reach out, a towel drop alluringly, or a tongue salaciously invite you to embark on a dark debut into deliriously decadent delights.

For better or worse, the baths offered gay men a safe environment in which to go shopping for sexual partners. Some nights were total losses; on other evenings one could end up in a hedonistic bangaramathon whose sexual energy waxed and waned as people moved in and out of a pulsing, homoerotic cluster of male flesh. Sometimes an orgasm was met with admiring applause followed by the sweetest kind of conversation; at other times the man with whom you had just been so intimate vanished into the darkness.

Whether you saw him in the showers a while later or he ended up serving you brunch the following weekend, gay bathhouses offered a unique kind of meat and greet. I'll never forget bumping into Zohn Artman in the Press Room at the San Francisco Opera a year or two prior to his death. "I know you from somewhere, but I just can't place where that could be..." Zohn sighed as he tried to make small talk. My reply took him by surprise: "I was sitting beside you at the 21st Street Baths last night as you gave someone a very loud and vociferous blowjob!"

Back in the days of "Fuck him first, get his name and number later," many gay men went to bathhouses with the secret hope that a sexual encounter might lead to something more. Change a few pronouns in the following songs and their lyrics describe that glimmer of hope felt by so many men as they paid for a key to a locker (or private room), were handed a towel, and buzzed inside to enter a gay garden of earthly delights.








Staged readings of new plays pretty much work the same way. While each holds the lure of literary promise, what you get is little more than a dramatic crap shoot. One may encounter a short, fleeting playlet of comic brilliance, a mini-drama of rare poignancy, or a clumsily-written work that lands with a thud and seems incapable of finding an ending.

Two Bay area nonprofits are dedicated to encouraging playwrights to create new work. Because each depends largely on social media for publicity and box office sales, the audience at any playwright's reading is bound to include a healthy sampling of supportive friends, family, and coworkers.

  • One organization offers a carefully defined incubator program which guides aspiring playwrights through the creative process of creating short plays.

  • The other offers participation in an annual festival in which plays of varying lengths are given semi-staged readings in front of a live audience, thereby offering playwrights an invaluable opportunity to hear what their work sounds like when spoken by voices other than the ones in their heads.


* * * * * * * * * *


Last fall, Playground (the dramatic incubator) took advantage of special circumstances to offer up a night of brief musical delights entitled The Gershwin Plays. The challenge was to create a short play that had been inspired by a song written by George and Ira Gershwin. As a prelude to the evening, soprano Sharon Rietkerk performed an excerpt from Diane Sampson's work in progress entitled Sleeping Cutie: A Fractured Fairy Tale Musical (which receives its world premiere production at San Francisco's Thick House from April 17-May 11).





The plays chosen to be performed that night covered a wide range of ideas:

  • Written by Patricia Cotter and directed by Doyle Ott, Someone To Watch Over Me featured Michael Asberry as a probation officer and Lyndsy Kail as one of his more irresponsible clients.

  • Written by Josh Senyak and directed by Virginia Reed, Just For The Length of A Sigh took audiences back to the golden days of Molly Goldberg. To my delight, the script included a Yiddish word ("upstairssica") that I hadn't heard in at least 40 years!

  • Written by Tom Swift and directed by Nancy Carlin, The Man I Love offered a poignant look at a pair of World War II recruits about to ship out to the war zone who suddenly realize that they are much more attracted to each other than they are to the girls with whom they should be dancing.



2013-12-23-swiftkleinmann.jpg
Playwright Tom Swift with Playground's co-founder Jim Kleinmann



  • Written by Tanya Grove and directed by Jim Kleinmann, Love Doctor, Heal Thyself featured an advice columnist (modeled after Beatrice Fairfax) who gets a taste of her own medicine.

  • Written by Madeleine Butler and directed by Becca Wolff, A Beautiful Evening hilariously demonstrated what can go wrong when a slightly tipsy society matron is asked to stop eating all the olives at a cocktail party and then entrusted with facilitating a delicate social introduction that comes pre-loaded with unreasonable expectations.

  • Written by Maury Zeff and directed by Gabriel Grilli, Love Spacewalked In was clearly an audience favorite (you can read more about it by clicking here).


* * * * * * * * * *


Over at the EXIT Theatre, 2013's SFOlympians Festival featured a wealth of local talent (92 actors, 30 writers, 25 artists and 12 directors). New works by two of the Festival's regular playwrights were of particular interest to me.


2013-12-23-kirk_shimano.jpg
Playwright Kirk Shimano



Kirk Shimano (a regular participant in both Playground and the SFOlympians Festival) decided to turn The Judgment of Paris upside down and inside out by moving the action to a seedy gay bar. Directed by Katja Rivera, Shimano's Paris benefitted as much from the cast's shameless mugging before a rowdy audience as it did from the playwright's hilarious script. According to the notes on the SFOlympians website:

"Paris was a prince of Troy and fought in the Trojan War, but he is perhaps most famous for his role in starting the conflict. When Zeus hosted a banquet on Mount Olympus for the marriage of Peleus and Thetis, he invited all of the deities save one: Eris, goddess of strife and discord. Incensed at this snub, Eris crashed the banquet and presented a golden apple bearing the inscription "For the fairest" to its guests. The goddesses Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite immediately claimed this prize and refused to share it. Zeus delegated the job of choosing the recipient of the apple to Paris. After much conniving, Aphrodite offered Paris the love of the most beautiful woman in the world if she was chosen the winner. Paris chose Aphrodite, which led to Aphrodite revealing Helen of Sparta, which inspired Paris to abduct Helen from King Menelaus (the act that set the Trojan War into motion)."



2013-12-24-posterartparis.jpg
Celeste Shulte's artwork for Kirk Shimano's Paris



Shimano's reworking of Greek mythology transformed Hera, Athena, and Aphrodite into three tacky drag queens. Although Jeremy Cole's haughty characterization of Margo Harrington caused one audience member to crow about his success at impersonating Angela Lansbury, Cole's drag snobbery offered a highly refined contrast to the bloated, garishly dressed John Lennon Harrison's portrayal of Martha Val Martha, and Perry Aliado's overly precious take on Columbia Vanderbilt Yale (who craved an invitation to one of Margo Harrington's A-Gay parties).

The fun began with the arrival of an obnoxiously straight and bitter Erissa (Molly Benson), who pushed herself into becoming the emcee for the beauty contest and promptly set the drag queens up to compete against each other in a series of vicious party games. With Mackenszie Drae portraying Paris as a studly (albeit dimwitted) college jock and Alaric Toy's insecure Hermes transformed into the lovesick gay wingman (who has a hopeless crush on his handsome friend), The Judgment of Paris quickly turned into a gay catfight with Michelle Talgarow forcefully barking out Shimano's stage directions. With no room for subtlety, a brazen good time was had by all.

* * * * * * * * * *


The 2013 SFOlympians Festival closed with the first (and perhaps only) reading of a script that its founder, Stuart Bousel, has been laboring over for at least eight years. Bousel's lifelong fascination with Greek mythology led him to tackle Homer's Iliad by creating a narrated stage version of the story that would be too complex (and require too many actors) to ever get produced commercially. Unless, of course, he had a festival of his own in which his play could be read before a live audience.


2013-12-24-postersfolympians.png
Poster art for 2013's SFOlympians Festival



To outline the challenges he faced, Bousel explained that:

"The Trojan Horse is the first "Final Solution" in Western military history. In the tenth year of the Trojan War, the commander of the Argive army, Agamemnon, tasks his smartest man, Odysseus, with coming up with a way inside Troy's impenetrable walls. Odysseus envisions the Horse, though in some versions he is inspired by Poseidon, and in others by Athena. The Horse is constructed from the broken ships of the Argive army and bits of driftwood. It is large enough that as many as two dozen men (depending on the poet) are sequestered inside, fully armed, so that when the Trojans take the horse into their walls, these same men are able to slip out in the night and open the gates of the city, leaving it vulnerable to the hidden army waiting outside. Famously, the prophet Laocoon and the princess Cassandra both denounce the Horse as a trick, but neither is listened to and the Trojans claim what they believe is a peace offering from their rivals, thus prompting the famous saying "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts." The Trojan Horse itself has lived on in popular vernacular in a variety of ways, usually implying something that is two-faced or treacherous in nature, a terrible thing disguised as a beautiful one, or that which has, inside of it, something entirely unexpected."



2013-12-24-posterhorse.jpg
Emily C. Martin's artwork for The Horse or See Also All



Bousel's solution to the epic task he created for himself?

"Fascinated with the Horse and the War in general, I sought to write a comprehensive stage version of the War, tracing it from its roots through to the fall of Troy. I will be condensing where necessary, but also illuminating specific moments that touch on the specific theme of the duality and treasure/trick aspect of the War, from the Horse to Helen to the Gods themselves, as well as the broader themes of violence, disillusionment, love, objectification, honor, legacy, history and western literature and philosophy as a whole. Rather than trying to reduce the scope of the epic to fit into the modern American theater sensibility of small cast and small space, I seek to celebrate the erratic and almost incomprehensible nature of the war and create the largest, most extravagant play of my career with a sprawling adaptation that includes elements of my favorite versions, associated legends, and additions of my own. Stylistically, the play will combine intimate moments and traditional scenes smashed up against narrative choruses, direct address monologues, battle vistas and various experimental theater ideas and genre/tone departures such as game shows and reality television. Will it succeed? Will it fail? Probably."



2013-12-24-bouselcasthorse.jpg
Playwright Stuart Bousel with the cast of The Horse or See Also All
(Photo by: Charles Lewis III)



Bousel hit on a winning solution by assigning each actor to an archetype (which could be used to represent both Greek and Trojan characters). His dedicated cast consisted of:


  • Maria Leigh (The Storyteller)

  • Mariah Jane Castle (The Beautiful Girl)

  • Ashley Cowan (The Smart Girl)

  • Siobhan Marie Doherty (The Proud Girl)

  • Theresa Miller (The Woman)

  • Jan Gilbert (The Mother)



2013-12-24-horsereading.jpg
Part of the cast for the world premiere of The Horse or See Also All
(Photo by: Charles Lewis III)



  • Eli Diamond (The Boy)

  • Nikolas Strubbe (The Golden Boy)

  • John Lennon Harrison (The Strong Brother)

  • Tavis Kammet (The Weak Brother)

  • Carl Lucania (The Father)

  • Dan Kurtz (The Hero)

  • Mackenszie Drae (The Black Sheep)

  • Brian Martin (The Friend)

  • Matt Gunnison (The Man)

  • Paul Stout (The Old Man)



2013-12-24-curtaincallhorse.jpg
The cast for the world premiere of The Horse or See Also All pays
tribute to playwright Stuart Bousel (Photo by: Charles Lewis III)



With the playwright seated stage right, reading his stage directions, the large cast (which had only had a week to prepare for this reading while many of them appeared in other plays during the SFOlympians Festival) did a splendid job of bringing Bousel's script to life. Considering the running time of nearly two and a half hours, special credit goes to director Ariel Craft who quickly laid down a musical pace for Act I's tremendous amount of exposition (which brought to mind Meredith Willson's famous "Rock Island" number from The Music Man ).

Although the second act sagged a bit, that was partially due to an increasingly warm theatre, the large number of disillusioned Trojans and Greeks meeting their deaths, and the various twists and turns which led to a surprisingly moral game show finale. I was particularly impressed by the performances of Nikolas Strubbe, Matt Gunnison, Mackenszie Drae, and Dan Kurtz.


2013-12-24-arielcroft.jpg
Director Ariel Craft relaxes after the world premiere of
The Horse or See Also All (Photo by: Charles Lewis III)



Overall, I would rate this evening an artistic triumph which brought a fitting close to the 2013 SFOlympians Festival. While Bousel is the first to admit that his play doesn't have a chance in hell of receiving a commercial production, I'd venture a guess that it could find surprisingly sustainable life on the college circuit. With a script requiring a cast of 16 actors, it's a perfect joint project for a university's theatre and English departments.

Some adventurous high school drama clubs (where English classes are studying Homer's Iliad) might also want to sink their teeth into a script which can be staged with minimal costumes and scenery. The Horse or See Also All transforms one of literature's most famous epic poems into a highly relevant and accessible exploration of the costs and foibles of endless war.



To read more of George Heymont go to My Cultural Landscape

30 SXSW Acts About to Break

$
0
0
2014-03-15-sxswlogo.png



One of the points of South By Southwest is to try and tell who the next superstar will be. Many a famous name got their start at the Austin, TX festival, and if you're lucky enough and paying attention, you can say you saw them way back when (bragging rights are everything). While there genuinely is a lot of great music at SXSW, with every act being so loudly "buzzed" about, it's almost impossible to hear anything.

With this list of 30 about-to-break bands and singers, you won't have to spend all day running up and down 6th street trying to get in. No matter what you're into, there's something on here for you. Give them all a listen and remember these names, because you're going to be hearing a lot more of them soon.


Strange Talk - "Young Hearts"


Boys Noize - "Starter"


SOHN - "Artifice"


Penny & Sparrow - "Brothers"


Royal Teeth - "Wild"


Tomas Barfod - "Pulsing (ft. Nina K)"


Andrew Belle - "Open Your Eyes"


Slow Magic - "Corvette Cassette"


Tove Lo - "Out Of Mind"


Chet Faker - "Talk Is Cheap"


The Griswolds - "Red Tuxedo"


Samsaya - "Stereotype"


- "Don't Wanna Dance"


Owl Eyes - "Faces"


Peking Duck - "High (ft. Nicole Millar)"


Echosmith - "Cool Kids"


Goldroom - "Embrace"


Nina Nesbitt - "Selfies"


Magic Man - "Paris"


Chloe Howl - "Rumour"


Panama - "Strange Feeling"


RÜFÜS DU SOL - "Tonight"


ASTR - "Hold On We're Going Home" (Drake cover)


Miami Horror - "Holidays"


Ivy Levan - "Money"


Sir Sly - "Gold"


Blondfire - "Walking With Giants"


Matthew Koma - "One Night"


Cyril Hahn - "Perfect Form (ft. Shy Girls)"


RAC - "Let Go (ft. Kele and MNDR)"

"Frida Kahlo, Her Photos," The Museum of Latin American Art

$
0
0
Photo by Anonymous.

Wouldn't you love to peek inside Frida Kahlo's personal photo album? To see the images that have special meaning for the artist, images that paint a picture that varies greatly from the tortured individual portrayed in her paintings?

You can.

"Frida Kahlo, Her Photos," given its only West Coast showing at the Museum of Latin American Art, features over 200 images from her personal archive at Casa Azul, images that Diego Rivera sealed from public view for 50 years after her death in 1954. The exhibition shows a vulnerable, unguarded Frida, a smiling Frida, be it at work, at play, growing up or at the end of her life. The exhibition includes photographs by Lola and Manuel Alvarez Bravo, Man Ray, Tina Modotti and Edward Weston.

The installation is spectacular. The wall colors are as playful as her paintings and the walls are sculpted to create a flowing, see-through space that best presents the exhibition's six themes: "Her Parents: Guillermo and Matilde," "La Casa Azul," "The Broken Body,' "Amores," "Photography," and "Diego's Gaze."

A lot of the early photographs were taken by her father. This makes sense: he was a professional photographer. It's easy to see where she got her penchant for self-portraits. The images show a pre-polio and tramcar accident Frida as a lovely child, an adolescent and a young woman. One sequence looks like a series of yearbook photos: Most Likely to Set 20th Century Art on its Head.

Some of the images show indigenous peoples, some show the Mexican landscape. Intriguingly, there's a trio of images that depict, individually, Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin. Wouldn't you die to know the significance of that? For that matter, wouldn't you like to know specifically why she held onto each of the images on display? Surely they all had a story.

The most heroic images show her in the hospital after her accident. She lays on her bed, in traction. She has managed to install a horizontal easel that lets her paint, miraculously, with the canvas suspended above her. Other images show her lying on her stomach, the scar on her lower back a grim reminder of her operation. You know the particulars of her accident but the documentation of the surgery's aftermath provides a whole other level of appreciation for what she had to endure and what she managed to accomplish.

Some of the images are funny. A series of photographs shows family scenes or else get togethers with friends. What makes them funny is that, God knows why, she's cut herself out the image, a bit of self-editing that is as funny as it is intriguing. One in particular is outright cute: she's kissed a photo of Diego, her lipstick a reminder of more affectionate times.

The most remarkable image of all shows Frida sitting in a chair. The actual image is small but the Museum has blown it up so it dominates a wall. She looks severe. Not only is her hair down (you never see that), but she's also wearing a dark, unexceptional dress, nothing at all like the colorful clothes and jewelry with which we associate her. It's a stark image, a mesmerizing one. It shows a woman looking tough and determined, broken but not down.

This exhibition of Frida's Fridas presents another side of a woman whose back story, as shown here, is as fascinating as her paintings. The exhibition reminds us that, besides being married to Diego Rivera (twice, in fact), she was also a daughter, a sister, a relative, a friend, a patient and a lover. We marvel - and will continue to marvel - at how she managed to sublimate challenges physical and emotional into her art which in turn continues to inspire those with similar challenges. The impression that comes from this show is of Frida Kahlo as a constant gardner, making things blossom out of the most unlikely soil.

The exhibition runs until June 8. Museum hours are 11am - 5pm, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday and 11am - 9pm, Friday. Admission is $9 general, $6 students and seniors. Sundays are free. The Museum is locatred at 628 Alamitos Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90802. For more information, call (562) 437-1689 or visit www.molaa.org.

2014-03-15-with_friends_Anonymous.jpg
Viewing all 14859 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>