Quantcast
Channel: Culture & Arts
Viewing all 14859 articles
Browse latest View live

Design News Roundup - March 2015

$
0
0
2015-03-17-1426599370-4908321-1.DesignNewsRoundup.jpg

By Ann Binlot, March 18, 2015

Over the last month, one award-winning design firm announced its plans to work with a new social-good accelerator, while Teresa Borsuk was named Woman Architect of the Year. Anticipation for the upcoming Milan Expo is on the rise as Thinc released its exhibition plans for the U.S. Pavilion.

1. Teresa Borsuk Crowned Woman Architect of the Year 2015
Teresa Borsuk, a partner at the London-based firm Pollard Thomas Edwards, was awarded Women Architect of the Year 2015. Borsuk has championed female presence in her firm, with over half of the staff being female, a tough feat, considering the industry is male dominated. Borsuk beat out a number of accomplished women for the honor, including Cristina Segni of Foster + Partners, Carme Pinos of Estudio Carme Pinos and Wright & Wright partner Clare Wright.

2. Thinc Design Releases Exhibition Plans for U.S. Pavilion During Milan Expo: New York-based Thinc Design unveiled their exhibition plans for the U.S. Pavilion at the upcoming Milan Expo, which takes place in May. The exhibition, which will take place in the 26,000 square foot U.S. Pavilion, focuses on the expo's theme "Feeding the Planet, Energy for Life." Immersive installations and guides will take visitors through an interactive journey that presents an American look at global food security, farming, sustainability, contemporary American food culture, nutrition and international relations.

3. Yves Behar's Fuseproject to Design for New Social-Good Accelerator
ARTPHAIRE visionary Yves Behar's award-winning design firm fuseproject announced that it will provide services for Spring Accelerator. According to its website, the venture "supports businesses whose products and services could transform the lives of adolescent girls" in Uganda, Rwanda and Kenya. For the next five years, Spring -- which was formed by Nike Projects, USAID and the UK Department for International Development -- will provide finance, technical expertise and mentorship for 18 endeavors annually for the next five years.

4. More British Architecture Arrives in Manhattan: British architects are on a roll on the other side of the Atlantic. Zaha Hadid, Norman Foster and David Chipperfield all have projects in the works in New York. Hadid will have an 11-story apartment block, with units going from $4.6 million to $35 million that overlooks the High Line. Meanwhile, Chipperfield is returning to Bryant Park with a 32-story building called The Bryant, which house both a hotel and residences, and Foster + Partners has a 61-story high-rise building in the works.

5. Fab Acquired by PCH to Create the Netflix of Design
After what seems like several lifetimes in Fab's five-year existence, manufacturing company PCH has acquired the design ecommerce site. "I believe that PCH is the perfect partner to carry the Fab brand forward," said Fab co-founder Jason Goldberg, according to Dezeen. "PCH is known for its world-class operations, and its deep appreciation for brand, design, and the customer experience. PCH is the perfect home for Fab." The company plans to commission designers to create products unique to the site, as well as items by other brands. PCH founder and CEO Liam Casey told Dezeen he hopes Fab will become the "Netflix" of design.

--Ann Binlot is contributor to ARTPHAIRE. This New York-based writer and graduate of Columbia University School of Journalism covers the spectrum from foreign affairs and politics, to fashion and art. Binlot has also contributed to several publications including TIME, Marie Claire, Newsweek and more.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get the best of ARTPHAIRE delivered straight to your inbox!


Progress Requires Patience in This Town, but Slow and Steady Wins the Race!

$
0
0
If you've visited the National Mall in Washington, D.C. lately, you've undoubtedly seen the great progress being made on the construction of the Smithsonian's National Museum of African-American History and Culture (NMAAHC). The 400,000 square foot museum, projected to open in the Spring of 2016, was created in 2003 by an Act of Congress that established it as part of the Smithsonian Institution. Three years later, following an extensive study conducted by a Congressional Commission, the Smithsonian Board of Regents voted to build the museum on a site adjacent to the Washington Monument. While 13 years may seem like a very long time to most, those of us in D.C., know that in this town, things move slowly. I was reminded of this while reading a recent E.W. Scripps article about the NMAAHC's progress in which the NMAAHC Deputy Director, Kinshasha Holman Conwill said, "...that's breakneck speed in the nation's capital."

Ms. Conwill went on to say:

In D.C. terms, this is very short. If you complete a project within the lifetime of anyone working on it, you've achieved great things... By the time President Bush signed the legislation, 100 years had actually passed since it was first thought to honor African-American history and culture.


As one of the founders of the National Women's History Museum (NWHM), I know D.C. time all too well. NWHM was founded in 1996, following the efforts of a small group of women determined to move a seven-ton statue of the suffragists Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott from the Crypt of the U.S. Capitol to the Rotunda where it had been dedicated in 1921 as a thank you from the National Women's Party to Congress for passing the 19th Amendment giving women the right to vote. (Speaking of D.C. time -- let's remember, it took 72 years of campaigning to convince Congress to give us that right.)

NWHM educates, inspires, empowers and shapes the future by integrating women's distinctive history into the mainstream culture of the United States. One of our major objectives is to build a world-class national women's history museum at the National Mall in Washington, D.C. that will serve to educate all Americans about the critical and indispensable role women have played in our history. We've been at this for a long time. Nearly 20 years.

It's been a very frustrating process. We were originally informed that there were no remaining spaces for building on the Mall so we investigated multiple sites throughout Washington. We later learned that in fact, there IS one site left and chose to pursue it because we firmly believe a Museum representing 51 percent of the population belongs at the nation's premier civic space.

As you might expect, Congress oversees what can and cannot be built on or near the Mall and we petitioned the House and the Senate with various bills in every session of Congress beginning in 1999. Through the years the bills passed in either the House or Senate, but never both in the same Congress. That changed on December 12th of 2014, when Congress approved legislation to form a bipartisan Congressional Commission to produce a feasible plan for the Museum. The plan will consist of the Commission's recommendations for the governance, organizational structure, operations, fundraising and location of a national women's history museum. (The NMAAHC and the National Museum of the American Latino also went through this process. The key difference is that our legislation clearly states that the NWHM Commission would be 100 percent privately funded -- making it the first privately funded Congressional Commission for a national museum. In other words, this Commission won't cost taxpayers a dime.) According to the legislation, Congressional leadership in both the House and Senate are to name the commissioners this week. Once identified, the Commission will have 18 months to conduct its study and report its recommendations to Congress at which point Congress will then vote to approve the building.

Some of our supporters have wondered what's taking so long, and I can only point to the fact that as Ms. Conwill indicated, few things move quickly in this town. The good news is that today, we are closer than ever to making the Museum a reality.

It took a 72-year campaign for women to gain the vote. And, it took 100 years for the NMAAHC to become a reality. Similarly, it's taking a long time to overcome challenges to changing the perceptions of women and their role in building this nation and shaping our society. It's happening, but it's happening in D.C. time. Persistence is key and as Susan B. Anthony stated so very many years ago, "Failure is impossible!"

Why Do the English Insist on Showing Rubens If They Dislike Him So Much?

$
0
0
The Royal Academy's Rubens and His Legacy raises more questions than answers and make me wonder why the English find it so difficult to understand or even tolerate him. The clearest example of this confusion comes from the exhibition's fiercest critic, The Guardian's Jonathan Jones.

2015-03-17-1426559290-7451096-rwpct8iuso2prqlts3zj.jpg


Jones is right at pointing out that the curators' decision to turn the whole exhibition into a Rubensian assortment of works by artists allegedly influenced by him, is a bad idea. The examples that he chose, however, to illustrate his point are so wrong that they evidence a worrying lack of awareness. From the beginning, Jones broadcasts his frustration with the curators' decision to place a painting by John Constable at the beginning of the show, nearby one of Rubens' landscapes.

2015-03-17-1426560035-724238-Peter_Paul_Rubens_060.jpg


In his own words: 'It is hard to think of a painter who has less in common with Rubens. But the curators have spotted one connection I never guessed: they both painted rainbows. That is the RA's less than precise approach to art history. So Rubens invented the rainbow, apparently. Rubens and His Legacy tries to distort the rich and complex story of art to fit a simplistic big idea. Constable, Turner and Gainsborough - all of whose landscapes are juxtaposed with those of Rubens here - were fascinated by the great European masters: their biggest "influence" was the 17th-century French landscape artist Claude. So why try to claim that Rubens was somehow their one true source?'

Even though it is true that Constable, Turner and Gainsborough's landscapes were influenced by Claude, they were more so by Rubens. While Claude's landscapes are idealised arcadian perfections with mythological figures, in Rubens' Het Steen we see a conflation of this and the Late-Renaissance Flemish tradition of Patimir, Brueghel and Bosch. It is that human inflicted ruggedness that Constable observes in Rubens and that is enough of a reason to suggest a curatorial link.

2015-03-17-1426559743-2174475-c8da7d600eaf4bbaae4bff78c0d50cb5620x428.jpeg

When referring to the curators' decision to include a Warhol portrait of Jackie Kennedy besides one by Rubens, Jones says: 'Please, tell me, that I am dreaming it! I really don't see any possible similarity between Rubens and Warhol'. Well, what about the fact that both were artistic superstars that used the pictorial surface as a space where theirs and their sitters' identities were negotiated. It is a fact that when we look at one of Warhol's Marilyns, we see her facial features but we can also see him through his style'. Another similarity between these two artists has to do with the fact that they both used to leave the execution of their paintings to their employees.

2015-03-17-1426560291-4077134-redjackie1964andywarholsilkscreeninkandsyntheticpolymerpaintoncanvas1369028046_org.jpg


This confusion takes us to the real problem of a show that does not appear to do itself many favours by placing pieces by Rebecca Warren and Sarah Lucas along masterpieces by Rubens' and Andy Warhol. I think that the problem with this show is that it does not do what it promises to do. Even though the show's title includes the word 'legacy', there is no distinction made between 'allusion' and 'influence' for the former has to do with borrowing while the latter is often unconscious.

Jonathan Jones, however, becomes insulting when saying that Rubens was not only just a courtier but also 'a supreme decorator who never touches profundity. Thus, he will never be a Rembrandt, Caravaggio or Velazquez. These three geniuses all lived in the same age that Rubens dominated. But where he created seductive confections, they tell a more serious truth'. Here, Jones misunderstands the use of 'chiaroscuro' with 'the ability to convey serious truth through painting'. Rubens' art should, however, be understood as an alchemic manipulation of something dead (pigments) into something alive (Inmortal Art). His works has that centrifugal drive that demands an over-crowded pictorial space compositionally organised as a wheel which transforms the painting itself into an allegory of the cycle of life. Besides, while Velazquez used to be a painter of peace (for even his war paintings depict people at rest), Rubens is a painter of violence. There is always conflict and blood in his paintings to the point that it is not too far fetched to think that he uses blood as an allegory of painting for, at the end of the day, when one has nothing else to paint with, there is always blood.

For Audiences, Loving Ben Scheuer Will Be Easy

$
0
0


Benjamin Scheuer sat at Buvette in the West Village, a casual grin stretching up toward his perfectly coifed 'do. "I dressed for spring today," he said with a velvet voice, sliding over words like they were made of silk. He did look like spring, with all its restless energy and magnetism. His silver suit and cotton candy tie, along with an ocean blue fedora that he left by the restaurant's door, gave off the allure of an Impressionist painting -- perhaps a mix of Monet's muted water lilies and Toulouse-Lautrec's bawdy back rooms.

The air around him smelled of vintage cologne, but also sweet like Belgian waffles. When he talked, it was with familiarity and warmth. He never stumbled over syllables, but he would pause sometimes, a songwriter lilt dictating the rhythm of his speech. He had discreet mannerisms -- playing with a fork while thinking, or leaning forward just enough to seem friendly without being imposing. You might applaud his undeniable charisma and try to mask your pomegranate cheeks because he's the kind of debonair that reminds you of F. Scott Fitzgerald, a lit match, and whisky on the rocks.

But it seems that, beneath his charming façade, Scheuer has depth as well. This comes out in his opinions and some of the subtleties in his gesture (a hint of a smirk at someone's naïveté or a handshake that feels a little too rehearsed). Nowhere is it quite so obvious as in his music.

"Write down the one thing you certainly do not want anybody to know about you, and burn the paper afterwards -- whatever," he explained. "And then start there. Start your song there. That's your first line. And the first time you do it, it's horrifying, and it's the worst thing ever. But if you do it every single day for three months, it just becomes your job."

His passion made you wonder how difficult it was to get through those first three months of writing while tucked away in a Connecticut cabin with snow outside and a pen in hand.



Scheuer is the mind behind The Lion, an autobiographical musical directed by Sean Daniels and performed by Scheuer at the Lynn Redgrave Theater. The venue itself fosters the intimacy that you find in downtown New York: a small stage surrounded by spectators. There's none of the imposition of colossal music halls, and perhaps that makes the work's truthfulness even more urgent, especially when Scheuer's purpose is "creating something out of that which is honest to me."

In The Lion, Scheuer's songs guide the audience through a bildungsroman that is as unique as it is poignant. The ambiance feels folksy thanks to the seven guitars onstage. However, Scheuer's favorite lyricist is Eminem, and his eclectic artistic influences, as well as his knowledge of the Greek dramatic structure, peek through in his music. And so The Lion is a narrative wrapped in a concert inside a musical.



The story begins when Ben is a child and his father makes him a cookie tin banjo out of houseware. Suddenly, when he's only 13 years old, his dad dies from an aneurism. Scheuer moves to England with his family only to rebel and return to New York a few years later. One day, while waiting for the subway, he meets a girl, Julia, and falls in love. Of course, she leaves him. Then, he's diagnosed with lymphoma and has to overcome disease. A macabre tale, indeed, and yet he makes it seem so light and uplifting.

Though Scheuer's coming of age plot may be out of the ordinary, it resonates because of the universality of loss, grief, and guilt.

"I get a lot of letters from people who tell me their stories," he said. "I think they feel like we know one another because they've spent an hour and a bit in my living room listening to me talk to them directly. And that's the intention of the show."

Even so, Scheuer is much more complicated than his musical persona. "People fall in love with characters, and just because I'm playing the character of myself, it doesn't mean it's me that they're meeting," he said.

In fact, The Lion excludes a good chunk of Scheuer's narrative because of time restraints and flow. Scheuer doesn't talk about acting alongside Eddie Redmayne in his high school production of Jesus Christ Superstar. There's never a mention of his Harvard education, his years hidden in Boston studying English. Some songs from his band, Escapist Papers, have been cut because they aren't necessary to the story. Scheuer understands what it means to kill your darlings, and he does so relentlessly in order for his autobiography to work.

"Get rid of all the extraneous clutter. [Maintain] harmony and dissonance. Make it about one thing," he said about songwriting.

JULIA, JULIA. Benjamin Scheuer/Escapist Papers. Live at Lincoln Center, 1.30.2012 from Escapist Papers on Vimeo.



This wisdom came from his colleague, Riya Lerner, a photographer who shot Scheuer throughout his cancer scare and who collaborated with him on his book, Between Two Spaces. Inside its pages, simple, uncluttered images of Scheuer emphasize incisions and scars.

Two photos jump out from the rest. In one, he stands nude like David at the Accademia. It was taken just after his diagnosis, when he had shed 25 pounds because he was sick. Everyone told him he looked great, and he did. But his drastic weight loss was a sign of wavering health, and it was almost ironic that he was so attractive during his most mortal moment.

In the second photo, taken well into treatment, Scheuer slumps on the ground. He's getting well, but he's never looked worse. The juxtaposition of the two pictures -- the notion of how poorly the outside can reflect what lies inside -- was one of the themes Scheuer was particularly intent on highlighting in Between Two Spaces.

For most, it might be daunting to have an unfamiliar face following you around in your apartment while you strut unclothed, slowly growing accustomed to your new body ravaged by cancer. But for Scheuer, it wasn't an issue.

"Naked is not vulnerable to me," he explained. "Vulnerable is lying at the whim of medical cocktails and having bone marrow sucked out of my back. That's vulnerable."

The photo project was another example of Scheuer creating something from disaster. "A lot of times it felt stupid or boring or wasteful, but I stuck to it because I believe in my heart that making stuff out of the bad things that happen to you is good," he said.

INVISIBLE CITIES. Benjamin Scheuer/Escapist Papers. Lincoln Center. 1-30-12 from Escapist Papers on Vimeo.



Obviously, transforming tragedy into art is Scheuer's specialty. He's an expert at taking the taboo and weaving it into a commodity -- something that can be digested by the masses. When asked how he feels comfortable writing about challenging experiences, particularly ones that involve characters other than himself, he laughed with a blasé yet serious tone.

"Oh comfortable?" he asked. "I don't feel comfortable doing it, and that's why I do it. I think that the best writing comes when I'm not comfortable. It's comfortable to talk about the weather or your day. It's not comfortable to talk about why your relationship failed or what it was like watching your father have an aneurism."

"The truth is uncomfortable," he continued. "We don't like what really happened. We try to polish our narrative."

And The Lion is absolutely polished; it must be to translate to the dramatic sphere. Still, underlying the polish is grime, and that's what makes the production so endearing. Because it's a diamond in the rough in the best way, Scheuer's musical has garnered attention around the world. The focus always comes back to his dapper je ne sais quoi, and while digging into his eggs at breakfast, he mocked the descriptions that so often define him to the public.

"They said I have a winning personality, which I point out simply means they don't want to have sex with me," he said of an article in the New York Times. "That's what a 'good personality' means. Think back to high school. 'What's he like?' 'He has a great personality.'"

But Scheuer does have a great personality. There's a reason why big names are attracted to The Lion; Ben presents as someone with whom you'd like to grab a beer. Or maybe sushi, as he did with Bruce Willis a few weeks ago after the Hollywood star came to his show. During spirited conversation about the theater, Willis and Scheuer concluded that they should trade roles for a while.

"Ultimately we decided that he's going to be in The Lion and he's going to play Ben, and I'm going to go be an international action hero," Scheuer joked.

Assuming that he'll forgo his international action hero career, you might wonder what's next for Scheuer after The Lion. Well, he's dealt with pain for years, so now it's time to pursue pleasure. He's currently working on a musical, Kink, about sex and sexuality in BDSM. The subject seems fitting. After all, Scheuer is the type of Casanova that a sexually frustrated, middle-aged woman might use as inspiration for her fan fiction.

But for now, Scheuer's still playing his heart out night after night at the Lynn Redgrave Theater. When The Lion leaves Manhattan on March 29, he'll tour the country, sharing his tunes with regional audiences. They'll wander into auditoriums, searching for a message in his one-man musical. The best part? They'll have to come up with it on their own.

"I would never tell anybody how to listen to my show," Scheuer said. "I'd be glad if they listened carefully."

The Body of Michael Brown--A Response to Kenneth Goldsmith

$
0
0
2015-03-18-1426654490-4790103-140818michaelbrowngraduationjms2128_e9443531d58b213656488e4ce6d17a4f1.jpg


It is likely that poet Kenneth Goldsmith and most of the audience last Friday night at Brown University have never attended an autopsy. For them, Goldsmith's reading of his poem, "The Body of Michael Brown," a creative editing of Brown's autopsy report, was not tied to the physical experience of cutting into a human body, but rather to the political associations that surround this particular body. Indeed most of the discussion and heated reactions that have followed are not critiques of the poem as such, but relate to whether Goldsmith, as a white man, has the right to appropriate such a text.

As a physician, I have a special relationship to the material Goldsmith read, a relationship that points to what is fundamentally wrong with his poem. My most acute memory of attending autopsies is the quiet awe, which arises from being in the presence of something at once quotidian and momentous. This something is not conceptual; whatever it is, it invokes a visceral sensation of an absent presence or a present absence: the being that this body contained. The gallows humor that inevitably punctures the stillness of the autopsy room arises from our inability to parse, describe, or translate this experience. The banal clinical language of the autopsy report is symptomatic of this. It succeeds in evoking the immensity of the absent being only in so far as it utterly fails to do so.

In a statement put out on Facebook in response to the controversy, Goldsmith writes: "I altered the text for poetic effect; I translated into plain English many obscure medical terms that would have stopped the flow of the text; I narrativized it in ways that made the text less didactic and more literary." The irony of this is that Goldsmith practices what he calls "uncreative writing," specifically he writes conceptual poetry, a type of poetry in which the poet does not compose an original text, but rather reframes a pre-existing one. In his book, Uncreative Writing, he notes that, literary critic Marjorie Perloff has suggested that, "because of changes brought on by technology and the Internet, our notion of genius -- a romantic isolated figure -- is outdated. An updated notion of genius would have to center around one's mastery of information and its dissemination...She (Perloff) posits that today's writer resembles more a programmer than a tortured genius, brilliantly conceptualizing, constructing, executing, and maintaining a writing machine."

The machine basis for conceptual poetry lends itself to the seductive illusion that, because they are associated with lifeless computers, these processes are somehow ahistorical and apolitical. The Internet, too, by providing access to millions of documents, anytime, anywhere, perpetuates this fallacy, that these have no material specificity. In truth, information originates and circulates within specific material, political and social circumstances. To forget this is to be lulled into thinking that the fluidity and flattening of information on the Web somehow erases the white male privilege of "real life." Goldsmith's Facebook statement that he "took a publicly available document from an American tragedy that was witnessed first-hand (in this case by the doctor performing the autopsy) and simply read it" reveals that either he has succumbed to this illusion or he is not telling the truth. Perhaps the best rebuttal to the poet's pronouncement is his own decision to end the poem with the description of Michael Brown's penis, a castrating gesture, which serves to show that "The Body of Michael Brown" is white male auteurship dressed in the drag of "uncreativity."

Goldsmith's writing and performance of "The Body of Michael Brown" is problematic, not because he does not have the "right" to use the text, but because his use of it is fundamentally false. Not only does he hubristically presuppose that texts, like dead bodies, are neutral objects that can be cut and sutured without doing harm, but, as one young black woman suggested in our discussions the next day, he assumes that he can take the language of the autopsy report into his own body. That is to say, he can somehow speak it truthfully, not as an error-filled translation, but as a new language: Goldsmithese.

Performing under the hyper-circulated image of Michael Brown in his graduation photo, for thirty minutes Goldsmith delivered a relentless sing-song that effaced personal affect and offered no interruptions save for when he paused to drink from a glass of water. However, despite his masterful command of the stage and the audience, he was unable to seamlessly appropriate the medical vernacular. This is not surprising. The language of medicine is difficult. It arose to exclude those bodies not privileged to learn it. Fumbling over and at times even mispronouncing words, Goldsmith's failure was not these blunders, which in actuality revealed the truth in a way that his poem did not, but in his having no humility, no sense that there was anything or anyone else in the auditorium (the absent presence, present absence in the autopsy report) besides the relentless "truth" of his poem. Had Goldsmith recognized his own limitations and the impossibility of his attempted appropriation, he might have let silence, misspeaking, and heteroglossia play a more active role in his performance. Instead, not only were we instructed not to interrupt him even though the conference he spoke at was called Interrupt 3, he elected not to make any prefatory remarks or respond to any comments afterward.

Mr. Brown is a symbol, no doubt, and no doubt he is being used for multiple purposes, but in the end, he is/was something more, something that the autopsy report points to in not pointing. Here was a singular being, a being that can no longer speak except through the words used by others to inscribe it. Goldsmith could have let the singular being that was Michael Brown, be heard, but, in the end, he did not have the compassion, the empathy, or the humility to do it. And because of this, he failed his art, he failed his audience and, he failed Michael Brown.

There's a Rock Band Named Black Pu**y -- And That's Not Okay

$
0
0
Three years ago this spring, I was attacked by a livery cabdriver in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. He was driving me home and after some number of blocks he pulled over, climbed into the back seat, and got on top of me. I hit and screamed, and in a gesture that didn't seem entirely my own, threw my hands above my head, found the car door handle, and used it to open the door and pull myself out.

I walked away, calling the NYPD. The driver would try and coax me back into the car before driving off. Two NYPD officers arrived and asked me some questions. After 10 minutes more of driving around looking for the guy, they told me they were going to put me in a cab home.

Fuck that and fuck this.

I met with a detective later that week. On his desk was a coffee mug that featured the image of a gun and the words "Bitch Get My Coffee". It remained within my peripheral vision as I browsed photos of potential suspects on his computer.

Three years later, I'm the front woman and drummer of a rock band that I started with a guy I met on Craigslist who turned out to be the love of my life. I'm a brilliant, gifted, black girl who makes magic happen. This past December when my boyfriend/ our guitarist Mike was told to remove the words "black lives matter" from his guitar amp by a D.C. venue, I was in a position to say something about it and I did so on stage. I was in a position to refuse to allow my humanity to be subject to controversy and I faced it with tears in my eye and words clawing up my throat. Ultimately, the venue apologized.

2015-03-18-1426688709-6463611-IMG_3080.JPG


It was terrifying but I did it because I'm tired of this shit. I'm tired of swallowing what I think for fear of making people feel uncomfortable or inconvenienced or judged. Yet while I'm mustering the bravery to proudly and persistently proclaim that black lives matter, a band of white guys from Portland are running around calling themselves "Black Pussy" with no consideration for how that registers in the mind of a black girl who has actually been reduced to that by a stranger.

In that cab, I wasn't a human or a person capable of my own spectrum of feelings and wants and emotions. Put simply, I was objectified. There are no words to account for what that feels like. And so when I try and find the words to explain why the band's name is offensive I struggle. I'm at a loss to explain a band enlisting a name so callous, so devoid of historical context, so irresponsible with our lives to represent their art. I struggle with understanding how a band with the name "Black Pussy" has no problem booking a national tour while our band's attempt to feature the words "black lives matter" on a guitar amp was too hot for D.C. I struggle with even dignifying the name with a response but here's the thing -- I know that there are people petitioning and protesting and feeling awful and unseen. I want you to know that we see you. We love you. We're creating music for you. My heart knows we're one band of many and while the stories you hear are of bands like this, the very bands you dream of exist and are dreaming of you, too.

I think saying offensive things for the sake of a reaction is lazy and stupid. Words matter and intentions aren't enough. The band's name is inherently violent because it evokes and desensitizes the stories, circumstances and actions of people that view us as less than human. You can't do that casually and shrug it off as part of the "positivity and love" that you're all about.

I'm not suggesting that the band change their name or be anything other than who they are. If it turns out that who they are is a band that's okay with casually objectifying girls like me, then so be it. They wouldn't be the first but so we're clear, that's who they are and they can't use "love" to shield themselves from responsibility.

In the end, "Black Pussy" is no better than the coffee mug at the police department -- taunting me of the very conditions that make my existence as a whole and sane human feel like an impossible task.

Fuck that and fuck this.

You can click here to sign the petition boycotting the band and the venues who host them.

A version of this post originally appeared on MusicBones.tumblr.com.

Iconic Surfaces

$
0
0
2015-03-18-1426679149-9440550-1.Luminor413Casselman.jpg
Luminor 4-13, 2014, 88 x 78 in.

The backstory leading up to the jaw-droppingly beautiful exhibition of new paintings by Stanley Casselman at Brintz Galleries in Palm Beach presents fascinating and engaging clues from the evolutionary road that the artist has traveled since his attraction to manipulating clay as a college student at Pitzer in Claremont, California. The artist's "Red Sea parting" moment came while majoring in economics, through the advice of his ceramics professor, David Furman, who persuaded Casselman that he had the natural ability and insight to become a painter and that he should take a painting class. It's a story that has many interesting parallels to those of hugely successful artists like Dale Chihuly, who started out as a textile major, which eventually led him to weaving glass together,and later, creatively expanding molten glass into translucent sculpture; or the billboard painter James Rosenquist, who carried his sometimes dangerous professional experiences from a one-man balancing act on scaffolding high in the air into his downtown Manhattan studio to become a stalwart of Pop Art by appropriating advertising pictures into his compositions. Likewise, Andy Warhol, whose exclusive source material also was borrowed imagery, parlayed his childhood fascination with movie stars into controversial silkscreen paintings that were created by pulling a squeegee across a blank canvas. It also needs to be noted that Roy Lichtenstein first worked as a commercial artist and window dresser, where he cultivated a fascination with cartoons and everyday objects that he captured in his artwork by an idiosyncratic abstraction painted through stencils, and for a time closely resembled Warhol's early paintings. Resemblances in styles and influences then and now are an acceptable and frequently celebrated reality in picture-making, where artists deliberately overlap with each other, often inseparably like the early experimental Cubist works of Picasso and Braque, which for years were identical as they continued to break down compositional conventions, and preceded the ultimate reuse of the printed page with the invention of collage. At some point, however, they went their separate ways.

2015-03-18-1426679183-8297711-2.IR3810Casselman.jpg
IR 38 10, 30 x 30 in. Permanent Collection of Colorado Springs Museum.



In Casselman's case, the familiarity with textures, coupled with the thick, tactile, earthy nature of clay that he manipulated with rubber and metal-edged "ribs," naturally and eventually carried over to his unique approach to painting, which he has been exploring for over twenty-five years. While in college, he used those ribs, essentially mini-squeegees, to define, mold or uncover hidden layers -- techniques that he continues to use on a much bigger scale today, as he methodically spreads paint across a tightly-stretched canvas. Through years of trial and error and always with his myriad of custom-built squeegees, Stanley Casselman has carefully crafted his personal iconic surfaces that began to get results and draw critical attention.

2015-03-18-1426679245-1932552-3.IR4110Casselman.jpg
IR 41 10, 2014, 49 x 49 in. Collection of Anne and Clay Rorbach.



Then, as luck would have it, after a work by Gerhard Richter sold at auction for a staggering $34.2 million, along came a challenge on Facebook proposed by Jerry Saltz, eminent art critic for New York magazine, which challenged artists to produce a painting in a perfect Richteresque-style for just $155, and Saltz would come for a studio visit. The thought of having one of Manhattan's most important critics visit Casselman's studio seemed too good for him to pass up, yet he was quite conflicted about the idea of copying Richter, or anyone, for that matter. However, caution to the wind, he set out to decode Richter's language. Encouraged by the ongoing explosive experiments and the promising results in his studio, Casselman knew he had something and indeed he succeeded. Saltz visited and got his painting; $155 changed hands; but Jerry was so taken by what Casselman had created that he decided to write a feature story about it in New York magazine.

2015-03-18-1426679316-444914-4.StanleyCasselmanpaintinginstudio.jpg
Stanley Casselman working in his studio.



The best part of this historic tale is that in Casselman's paintings -- what led him here aside -- he's created a novel syntax that doesn't exist in Richter's repertoire. His recent small and large-scale works have been well received and seem to go well beyond Richter's standard fare. In addition, Casselman has perfected a delightful surface consisting of the unique practice of meticulously applying thick and thin paint, then pulling a squeegee across the canvas surface both vertically and horizontally, resulting in brilliant colors flowing and merging together to form a cohesive visual statement. Casselman, like an architect, plans well ahead to construct a strong, painterly foundation, which allows him to explore an adventuresome journey that ultimately provides structure, density, layering, fluidity, harmonic movement, spatial illusion and rich texture with a propensity for producing truly powerful works of art.

2015-03-18-1426679394-5679532-3.25.jpg
Brintz Galleries Installation



I'm reminded of the remarkable similarities between Casselman's background and serendipitous "luck of the draw" and that of acclaimed artist Harold Shapinsky, whose "discovery" was the subject of a lengthy feature article in The New Yorker in 1985. Shapinsky was a young man when he began painting abstract expressionist-based works in total obscurity, which he continued refining every day for over thirty years before he was noticed by accident. He had studied briefly with de Kooning and Motherwell, and then he diligently built a hybrid style that was associated closely with de Kooning's; in fact, Shapinsky's work often was misinterpreted as that of de Kooning. But curators and critics, including Kenworth Moffett, former director of the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, argued that Shapinsky perhaps was more original, and questioned "who came first?" His first exhibition in America was at my Palm Beach gallery, which nearly sold out, and included a painting that was purchased by Henry Ford. Next for Shapinsky was an acquisition by the National Gallery in Washington, D.C., and other museums, and finally an auction at Sotheby's, with the final sale amount ten times that of the original gallery price.

2015-03-18-1426679489-154569-6.Luminor424Casselman.jpg
Luminor 4-24, 2014, 61 x 49 in. Permanent Collection of Coral Springs Museum of Art.



In a way, Casselman was indirectly "discovered" when he took on a challenge that coincidentally pushed him forward and into the spotlight. Like Shapinsky, he was influenced by a universally recognized artist, but also like Shapinsky, he developed an engaging style of his own making through painstaking investigation that is now paying off both critically and financially. Museums are beginning to collect his work; shows are selling out in New York, California and London; reviews are coming in from The New York Times, Forbes, The Wall Street Journal and New York magazine; as well as a recent Phillips auction with one of his works bringing a stellar price. It's a pretty astonishing connection between these two artists.

2015-03-18-1426679545-7738430-7.Luminor17Casselman.jpg
Luminor 1-7, 2014, 79 x 63 in.



Even without the amazing backstory or the arm's-length attachments; appropriations aside, and with subtle coincidences and other obscure references to Rothko, Frankenthaler, Joan Mitchell, and others; these works offer a remarkable singularity of character, resourcefulness and a confidence of spirit that is refreshing, stimulating and striking all at once. Casselman offers an impressive, revealing visual parallel to a geologist's study of the layers of the earth's surface as moved by a force of nature or gravity, full of revelation and knowledge.

2015-03-18-1426679607-7717295-8.Luminor23Casselman.jpg
Luminor 2-3, 2014, 49 x 42 in. Collection of Jack Elkins.



Stanley Casselman, The Physics of Surface Tension, through April 12, 2015. Brintz Galleries, 375 South County Road, Palm Beach, FL 33480 http://brintzgalleries.com/

2015-03-18-1426679671-7866035-9.Luminor414Casselman.jpg
Luminor 4-14, 2014, 49 x 49 in.

Nintendo's 'Strong Females' Are Everything That's Wrong With Video Games

$
0
0
On Tuesday, Nintendo emailed me, saying that it was celebrating Women's History Month. How? By putting some of its female characters on Rosie the Riveter-style posters. It's a cute idea, but there's a big issue: Nintendo doesn't really have many powerful or playable female characters.

"Paving the way for diverse and interesting female protagonists in video games, Nintendo has picked a few of their popular leading ladies that merit this recognition for the month that honors outstanding women," the email reads. Those "diverse and interesting female protagonists" include a pink version of a toadstool and a pink version of a bomb, called Toadette and Bombette.

nintendo women

Here's the full list of female characters that Nintendo intends on celebrating for Women's History Month: Tetra from "The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker HD," Toadette from the Mario series, Bayonetta from "Bayonetta," Rosalina from the Mario series, Lucina from "Fire Emblem," Samus Aran from "Metroid" and Bombette from "Paper Mario." Have you heard of most of these characters? Didn't think so.

You may notice that one of Nintendo's most famous female characters, Princess Peach, isn't included in this list. That's likely because she generally plays the damsel-in-distress character rather than hero. Princess Peach appears in 15 Mario platform games (the ones where the characters jump from platform to platform) and is kidnapped in 13 of them. She's playable in only two of the Mario platform games, the ones she's not kidnapped in. She is, however, playable in the "Mario Kart" games, thankfully.

It's also worth noting that one of Nintendo's featured characters, Tetra, is kidnapped in the game "The Legend Of Zelda: The Wind Waker" and must be saved by a male character. Once it is revealed that she is actually Princess Zelda, Tetra is forbidden from leaving the castle, since it's "too dangerous." Not cool.



When the female characters aren't being saved, they're just what feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian calls "Ms. Male Characters," or "female versions of an already established or default male character." See: Bombette and Toadette. These two are just pink versions of the male characters.

The biggest issue with this "Ms. Male Character" trope, as Sarkeesian says, is that it makes the character's gender her most important quality. Male characters can have all sorts of personality traits that are expressed through their character's design, but when a character is female, that becomes her entire identity. Female characters are often just "female," rather than possessing any personality traits.

Even the more famous, developed characters are problematic in their unnecessary sexualization. Check out this clip of Bayonetta:



Studies have shown that sexualized portrayals of women in video games negatively influence peoples perceptions of women in life.

So what's to be done? You have to admit that there's a problem before you can make a significant change. By sending out this press release about all of the steps Nintendo is making for women, Nintendo is minimizing the fact that women are not only underrepresented in games but are also sexualized and marginalized in games. And, of course, we haven't even scratched the surface of female gamers' harassment in games and online.

There are a few games that showcase powerful women characters -- games like "The Last Of Us" and "Beyond Good And Evil" -- but they are few and far between and, for the most part, aren't made by Nintendo.

The company did not respond when I expressed my concerns about this press release and asked if the company planned to include more female leads in future games.

A-Sides With Jon Chattman I Am Froot! - Marina and the Diamonds Shining Bright

$
0
0
They say diamonds are a girl's best friend. Well, Marina And The Diamonds have long been your ears' BFFs - both of 'em. The band fronted by the beautifully talented Marina Diamandis, dropped her third album entitled FROOT last week, and it's almost certainly going to propel MTD her/them to such great heights. The title track, by the way, is already blue whale big scoring millions of views on thee YouTube. Why shouldn't it? The song is bananas good as is the whole album. You can never go wrong with piano/keyboard-driven songs with razor sharp lyrics and vocals.

The Welsh singer/songwriter recently sat down for a chat with A-Sides in New York City to discuss the Froots of her labor, and totally annihilated two new songs. It doesn't get much better than this, people. You're welcome. Watch them below on their short climb toward pop domination. Dearest Apache, jump on it.

"Happy"


"Froot"

Interview:




About A-Sides With Jon Chattman:
Jon Chattman's music series features celebrities and artists (established or not) from all genres of music performing a track and discussing what it means to them. This informal series focuses on the artist making art in a low-threatening, extremely informal (sometime humorous) way. No bells, no whistles, just the music performed in a random, low-key setting followed by an unrehearsed chat. In an industry where everything often gets overblown and overmanufactured, Jon strives for a refreshing change. Artists have included fun., Charli XCX, Imagine Dragons, Alice Cooper, Joe Perry, Gary Clark Jr., American Authors, Echosmith,and many, many more!

2015-02-21-asideslogonew.png
Stay Connected:
http://asidesmusic.com/
https://www.facebook.com/thisisasides
https://twitter.com/ThisIsAsides

To Pimp a Butterfly: Redefining Freedom and the American Dream

$
0
0
James Baldwin, one of the most prolific writers and intellectuals of the Harlem Renaissance, suggested a very specific process for escaping the crippling confines of hatred and oppression as a man of color in America. Deriving from the philosophy of existential alienation, Baldwin's practice of Black Existentialism prescribed that black men displace themselves from their native environment, dwelling within uncomfortable solitude to forcefully strip themselves of their learned identity and develop a true definition of who they are. This process reshapes individual perspective in a way that allows black men to return to their native environment with a clear vision for how they can empower fellow black men in their communities.

Existential alienation is a philosophy emphasizing that a man is responsible for his own actions and possesses the freedom to choose both his development and destiny. It is the process of claiming control over your life. Thus, detaching from your predetermined identity provokes the transformative questions required to achieve enlightenment and discover purpose. By experiencing extreme vulnerability, a black man must inescapably confront the inner demons that fuel his self-destruction. As a result, he can run nowhere but within, incapable of blaming the known dynamics of race, nor leveraging the realities of history as an excuse to settle in conformity. The singular point Baldwin sought to make is that for black men to truly experience liberation in society, they must first be removed from that society to liberate themselves.

All good things come to those who stay true. You only have five years in this country before America takes the heart and soul out of a black man. You only have that time to fight back.

-- 2 PAC (Mortal Man)


As a remarkably progressive period for black music, art and culture -- the Harlem Renaissance produced many iconic pioneers who provided America with an insurgence of soul, style and personality. Genres like Blues, Jazz, Swing and Beat music presented a soothing soundtrack for stories of intense struggle to defeat oppression. Out of anguish, poetry arose as a thriving art form used to gracefully express the complexity, confusion and combativeness of the times. In a racially-charged period, the people of Harlem never relinquished their joy. Rather, they took pride in creating an entirely new culture of their own. It is that spirit of creativity, community and resilience, intertwined with a sheer hunger for wisdom and prosperity that still underlines the beauty of blackness today.

Channeling the revolutionary essence of the Harlem Renaisance, Kendrick Lamar's To Pimp a Butterfly is a gripping, soul-driven melodrama that masterfully depicts the story of a courageous young man fighting through the painful process of liberating himself. Maneuvering through songs, Kendrick shatters America's expectations to walk in his own definition of power as a free-thinking individual. With piercing lyrics laid over an assortment of funk beats, bellowing horns, heavy drums, scattering keys, entrancing saxophones and angelic harmonies -- To Pimp a Butterfly captures the conflicting emotions of a king chosen to lead a generation, who's become soberingly aware of the treacherous adversities that stand in his way. The 16-track album is Kendrick's catharsis, skillfully unleashing the explicit fury buried beneath the surface of the street-bred scholar who has outrun the grips of failure, but remains held captive by depression and the exhaustive effort to evade nihilism. Kendrick consistently attacks racially-charged topics, expanding the conversation to boldly challenge our perceptions of belief, religion, purpose, manhood and maturity.

While a diversity of subjects are explored, an overarching theme throughout the album is deconstructing the corrupt and contradicting concept of the American Dream. As a people, and as a culture, we celebrate achievement -- but what are we really celebrating? When we believe we've made it -- where have we made it to? As race is socially constructed in this country, so are its core values of worth and success. The common notion of the American Dream favors the privileged, formally excluding the poor, while eluding to wealth. The engrained idea of the American Dream took precedence in a time when black people weren't a priority to society, unless used as workers or assets to assist in acquiring the dream.

This American Dream dominates culture today. It is a misleading dream rooted in riches, recognition and status. For the disadvantaged, scrapping for significance with their backs against the wall -- there's nothing to lose in the chase to taste the dream. Consequently, this chase further feeds into the cycle of poverty, imprisonment and the gradual death of a powerful people. To Pimp a Butterfly discussed the death of potential at the hands of a trap, disguised as a dream, that can't be escaped until we go through the painfully honest process of freeing our minds.

You can't conquer the system if you're trapped in it. You can't overthrow the system while you're locked up, poor or sucked into the streets. You can't overpower the system if you're silenced or marginalized. It is like Kendrick's metaphor in describing the caterpillar, you are trapped in confinement, until you make the fearless effort to claim your freedom, because the butterfly does not know it is beautiful until after it has gone through the natural evolution of becoming one.

The caterpillar is a prisoner to the streets that raise it. Although the butterfly and the caterpillar are completely different, they are, in fact, one in the same. He sees how much the world shuns him and praises the butterfly. The butterfly represents the talent, the thoughtfulness and the beauty that lives inside the caterpillar.

-- Kendrick Lamar (Mortal Man)


Kendrick Lamar's brilliant body of work proves that freedom and the true American Dream is to be enlightened and self-aware. It is only at that point that a person becomes an individual, developing a new respect, appreciation and perspective on the society they live in. Dreams are more than amassing wealth, achieving success, or assimilating into a prototype. Dreams reflect our deepest and most authentic desires. We won't change the world until we become unwaveringly and unapologetically ourselves -- until we find our voice, our fight and our calling. That is living the dream. Yet, as Kendrick says, a dream is only a dream if you chase after it.

Art in the Palm of Her Hands: Interview with Anne Ricketts

$
0
0
2015-03-18-1426638548-7621636-IMG_0243.JPG


"i sculpt because i have to.
i love to create something out of nothing.
i do it the old fashioned way.
my finished piece actually ends up how i see it in my mind.
i can't say that about much else.
when you hold a piece i have made in your hands i held it in mine first."
-Sculptor, Anne Ricketts


I have always found miniatures to be intriguing. There's just something about teeny tiny versions of things that is utterly captivating. So when I happened upon the bronze sculptures of Anne Ricketts in the OK store in Los Angeles, I stopped in my tracks.

As I held a diminutive foot in my hand, I thought about how powerful a miniature work of art is. A painting on a wall, or a sculpture on a pedestal, is art that is typically viewed at a distance. A miniature quietly beckons to be held close for examination. Like a talisman, it seems almost magical. What must it be like to sculpt in miniature? There was only one way to find out, so I tracked down the sculptor, and she was nice enough to answer my questions.

Here is my interview with sculptor, Anne Ricketts.

What, or who, inspired you to become a sculptor, and what inspires your work?

My grandfather was a sculptor, and I have always been particularly moved by sculpture. I grew up around art. I love the classics: Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, later Henry Moore, and art from the Expressionist period. My taste is very eclectic, from Russian icons to ceramics from the 60s.

I am inspired by modernist design objects, mementos, old postcards, a leaf, a dried bone. I love nature, artifacts, antiques, ceramics. I marvel at the work of artisans past.

What was your first sculpture, and how old were you when you made it?

Ha! I haven't thought of that in years... a cat, when I was eleven, sculpted out of clay. I began in earnest in my mid-20s. I used to be an actor. I was visiting my mom (a writer who also sculpts) and she was teaching my nephews how to sculpt at the kitchen table. I sat down and gave it a go. I made three over-sized heads all leaning back on each other in a circle. (Think Stonehenge.) I know, don't ask, clearly I was feeling a lot of pressure then!

Anyway, I was hooked. I started sculpting every day. It was such a relief to express myself without having to wait around for someone to cast me in a show.

I never looked back.

You were an actor? Were you in anything of note?

Ummm, "of note" might be stretching it. I did one of Jet Li's first films, which was supposed to be his big break. Clearly it was not. I ended up getting dubbed in Chinese -- that was my acting highlight!

Briefly describe your process of bronze casting.

If I'm making a realistic piece I prefer to work from images, or drawings. If it is objects in nature, like a leaf, then I actually gather leaves. If it is a modernist piece, I work mostly without an image. I try not to think too much, and come at it more from a desire to pare down the form, and also focus on the feeling I want to express. I work the form over and over until I am pleased with the aesthetic of it.

I carve sculptures and jewelry in wax, clay, or foam, depending on the shape I want to create. With any sculpture, when it reaches a midway point, I work with a mirror, carving the piece by looking at the reflection. The mirror shows the imperfections I cannot see with my naked eye. I then run the piece by one or two people whose eyes I really trust, and I make adjustments.

When I'm happy with the form, I take it to one or two local foundries to be molded and cast. I approve the casting and pick the patina, and the piece is then finished, per my approval.

I use foundries in the area, because the environment, and keeping jobs local, is important to me. I try to make conscious choices, following the words of the bumper sticker slogan, "think globally, act locally." I've watched many foundries close over the past twenty years, with business moving to China. It impacts the environment of the world and deeply impacts our economy. So I am a big supporter of the mom and pop businesses here at home.

You can see my process, from start to finish, in this video. (My 11-year-old son made the video.)

Where in the world do you feel most at home and inspired? This could mean an actual place or a type of landscape.

The beach! Or in my tiny little studio. I like small spaces with all my sculpting tools around me, and some good tunes.

What are the tunes that are the soundtrack for your work?

I listen to country music mostly, or folk or Van Morrison.

You're in L.A., so I have to ask, are there celebrities that have bought your work!

I will throw down a few: Jakob Dylan, Annette Bening, Jamie Lee Curtis, Portia de Rossi, Jeff Goldblum, Jennifer Grey...

Have you ever shown your work in a gallery? 

I have, but honestly I like the idea of more commercial venues that offer affordable art and objects and are more accessible and less intimidating to the everyday person.  It's one of the aspects of working in miniature that I love. It's art that people can afford.

How did you first sell your work -- was there one deal with a store that led to others?

Larry Schaffer, the owner of OK, first carried my work years ago, even before he had his own store. He has been a mentor, and my biggest supporter. I often run ideas or mock-ups by him, and he suggests directions I should go in. I trust his eye, and his opinion, implicitly.

Do you have a favorite piece, or a piece you are most proud of, among your sculptures?

I have two favorites, actually... "Seated Woman with Child," which I made after my daughter was born. (She's nine years old now.) To me, it really expresses the protective and nurturing feeling of being a mother.

My second favorite is "Waiting," a portrait of my dog, Kali, just before she died. I had her for fourteen years and when I was told by the vet that she was sick, I took a series of pictures of her in what was her favorite way to lay waiting for me. I started carving her before she died, and finished shortly after her death. I have one by my fireplace and it is still a comfort to me.

What are you working on right now?

Candlestick holders inspired by Finnish silversmith and designer, Bertel Gardberg, and some jewelry pieces. I am sculpting jewelry and hands as part of a meditation series.

Name three things you can't live without. (Family not included.)

-Jalapeño flavored Kettle chips
-Nighttime earplugs
-20 pairs of CVS reading glasses... I lose everything

Anne's work can be purchased at these stores.



SEE MY BLOG, JUST ONE SUITCASE, FOR MORE STORIES OF ARTISANS AND ADVENTURES.

Cabaret Artist Joan Curto Finds the Heart and Humor in Sondheim

$
0
0
Stephen Sondheim ain't for sissies -- especially if you're a performer. His lyrics are smart and dense, and his music often veers into counter-intuitive rhythms and phrases. And, most importantly, his songs are character driven, and while they can certainly succeed in a presentational format, such as a cabaret show, it takes a certain level of performer to extract these numbers from the shows they originated in to make them "sing."

Thankfully, Joan Curto, who's celebrating 16 years as a beloved cabaret performer in Chicago, is such an artist. In celebrating the composer's 85th birthday, Curto has assembled a tight evening that doesn't shy away from some of the trickiest tunes from Sondheim's collection, including a clever opening number that mashes together "Something's Coming" from West Side Story and the opening number from Company. Another highlight includes a medley of all the various second act production numbers for the character Phyllis in the musical Follies.

2015-03-17-1426631476-5904967-joancurto.jpg
Cabaret Artist Joan Curto


Curto has the world-weariness and nuance to lend credibility some of the weightier numbers, including a plaintive "Send in the Clowns," as well the sly playfulness that inspires "I Never Do Anything Twice" and "Can That Boy Foxtrot" -- both tunes that delight in double-entendre, and where Curto seems to do her best work.

The night I caught her act, Curto did seem a little off her game with her banter and a few of the more complex lyrical passages, but anyone who can recover a lost lyric in the twisty-turny "Could I Leave You" without the entire number crashing down around their ankles (I've seen it happen with this particular number before) is an artist with clout.

And when Curto is on her game, such as when she delivers her authoritative "I'm Still Here," stand back. Something is coming, indeed.

Joan Curto Sings Sondheim plays every Saturday in March at Davenports Piano Bar -- but is currently sold out for the rest of the run! However, the show is set to come back in September. Visit davenportspianobar.com for more info.

Theater: Kristen Chenoweth Becomes a Legend in "On The Twentieth Century"

$
0
0
ON THE TWENTIETH CENTURY *** out of ****
LONESOME TRAVELER ** out of ****


ON THE TWENTIETH CENTURY *** out of ****
ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY AT AMERICAN AIRLINES THEATRE

The bubbly is on tap at the Roundabout for this classy, fun revival of On The Twentieth Century. That's bubbly as in champagne and bubbly as in the high spirits of Kristin Chenoweth, who giggles and stomps and twirls her way through the comic role of Lily Garland, a part she was clearly born to play.

Watching her perform this with ease makes clear why exactly On The Twentieth Century hasn't been seen on Broadway for a commercial run since 1978. Remember, this Comden & Green and Cy Coleman bit of nonsense ran for a year and launched the careers of Judy Kaye and Kevin Kline. But Lily Garland is hugely demanding vocally and comedically; On The Twentieth Century may be the most musically sophisticated score in history for such a silly show. In short, who the hell else could actually tackle this character? She has to sing and dance, trade punches with the fellas AND deliver tunes with the aplomb of a coloratura while making it all look easy. Chenoweth does but precious few others could. This should run as long as Chenoweth and co-star Peter Gallagher are on board but I pity her replacement.

Mind you, this isn't just a revival smoothly delivered by director Scott Ellis, choreographer Warren Carlyle and an excellent creative team. Nips and tucks can be found throughout the show (with additional lyrics by Amanda Green, natch, and additional material by Marco Pennette) from the trims in the overture right through what is essentially a brand new eleven o'clock number for Gallagher's Oscar Jaffe. Tighter transitions, removals of extraneous bits and emotional refocusing of the story all pay off with a streamlined show that barely catches its breath from the madcap introduction to the flourish at the finale. Fun? Absolutely.



Based on the classic play Twentieth Century (which led to the Howard Hawks film starring John Barrymore and Carole Lombard), this is the story of a down on his luck producer, broke, hounded by creditors and with a string of flops seemingly dooming him to obscurity. He's traveling on the Twentieth Century from Chicago to New York and needs a miracle. But wait! His one-time paramour Lily Garland -- the nobody he turned into a glittering star -- is traveling on the same train. Jaffe has just sixteen hours to discover a play, find backers and convince Lily to sign a contract. By God, he'll do it!

It's all nonsense of course, delivered with charm and style and in this production a modest sense of grounded reality. Jaffe is a monster in John Barrymore's hilarious film depiction, a producer who will do anything, just anything to accomplish his goals. Gallagher pays homage to that self-centered portrayal but -- without spoiling the fun -- he also makes Jaffe an actual, flesh and blood human being. As his sidekicks, Mark Linn-Baker and Michael McGrath are pitch perfect and take their cue from him: often scenery chewing wiseacres as characters, these guys play it relatively low-key and real as well. This all puts the emphasis on romance in this romantic comedy.

On the other hand, this realism doesn't quite pay off in the casting of the great Mary Louise Wilson as the religion-obsessed, independently wealthy Letitia Peabody Primrose, the perfect sap for bankrolling Jaffe's sudden inspiration to turn the story of Mary Magdalene into a Broadway show. Oh Wilson is good; she can't do otherwise. But there's not quite the sense of wacky abandon one might like. And this particular part is actually rather demanding on a physical level; for the big visual gag people still remember from the original, I was more worried about her safety than laughing. I hope she keeps acting for another 20 years but this wasn't the right antic role for her. (Still, great job on the cartwheels, Ms. Wilson!)

Similarly, Andy Karl lets himself down if not the show in the part of Lily's silly movie star lover Bruce Granit. He's fit and fine in the role and clearly having a lot more fun here than in the misbegotten Rocky. But somehow he makes very little impression. When you remember that this same role turned Kevin Kline into a star, the feeling of lost opportunity is inevitable. His big musical number is "Mine" in which both he and Jaffe are singing about Lily while staring into a mirror. They're in separate cars on the train but the audience sees them as unwittingly facing each other down. It's telling that instead of that hilarious one-upmanship you should expect that they both seem to be...staring into a mirror. There's no sense of connection, no comic electricity here.

On the plus side, the Porters -- who serve as the show's Greek chorus -- work like a charm. They've been wisely adjusted from the original's all-black porters of identical height who literally embodied the porter of movie cliche down to a t into four distinct men from smallest to tallest. They wowed the audience from start to finish, including their big number "Life Is Like A Train" which opens Act Two. (And it would take a close comparison of the two shows to figure out exactly why even this song had some apparent additions.) One hates to play favorites but the first among equals was the sexy and charming Rick Faugno, who immediately established a rapport with the crowd.

All the tech elements were superior, from the sets by David Rockwell to the costumes by William Ivey Long to crucial lighting by Donald Holder and flawless sound design by Jon Weston. I assume the ridiculous wig Chenoweth wore at the start as the dowdy Mildred Plotka was part of the fun so Paul Huntley did a great job too. Without actually being lavish in the extreme, they made the show at least look like a million bucks (which is understating matters, but you get the idea).

On The Twentieth Century zips by so quickly you almost don't realize how many good songs there are in it. The opener is a terrific scene setter, then Jaffe's character-defining "I Rise Again," the over-the-top "Veronique" (also tweaked to make its storyline clearer, I think), the hilarious "Never," the lovely "Our Private World" (my guest has dibs on that for his wedding song so I hope Chenoweth will be available), then "Repent" and that's just act one. Jaffe's eleven o'clock number, the hilarious and self-absorbed tune "The Legacy" has been turned into a declaration of love called "Because Of Her." That ups the emotional ante and makes this entire's production focus on (almost) believable characters pay off. Of course, they're not entirely believable since no one can actually sing like Chenoweth.

She and Gallagher almost seemed a little dampened as the show began when I caught it on a Wednesday. It had just opened and there was also a matinee that day, so you can imagine them running on fumes. As the show moved along, they loosened up and their voices warmed up and it actually helped this particular night build and build. Gallagher delivered in spades while Chenoweth was simply a delight. Five years is too long away from Broadway for her but it was certainly worth the wait. With performances like this, Chenoweth is well on her way of blossoming from a star into a legend.



LONESOME TRAVELER **
59E59


Well, they nailed the earnestness. This well-intentioned but flat-footed and sometimes risible evening of entertainment serves up everything that can make folk music seem hokey and goody-goody. It has educational passages, heavy-handed sermonizing and sincerity served up by the bucket. The show is rescued ultimately by the very thing it hopes to celebrate: classic folk and blues. So inadvertently, writer and director James O'Neil made his point; folk music will endure, even in the face of musical theater entombment.

I spent half the evening imaging what sort of night I'd create to celebrate folk music. A straight-forward revue would work well (and indeed this same cast would do that just fine). You could also tell the story of folk music's rise and fall (in commercial terms) by taking a more jaundiced look at its journey from angry, fist-raising blues and folk that fired up unions and frightened the power structure into the smoothed out entertainment that became acceptable TV fodder until it was ultimately blown up by Bob Dylan going electric.

But to focus on what we have, it's a survey of folk music -- often very well sung -- that means to educate and entertain about the music's roots, its history, how it reflected and perhaps influenced changing times and continues today with traditionalist purveyors and the likes of Mumford & Sons. It is dutiful and dull anytime the music stops, which thankfully isn't all that often.



It begins with a lovely sing-along on "How Can I Keep From Singing?" and then our narrator, a Pete Seeger-like fellow called Lonesome Traveler who has a penchant for over-explaining and never missing a chance to educate (just like Seeger!) steps up and starts talking. Justin Flagg sings well and delivers the dialogue as best he can.

That's not easy when a scene depicting Alan Lomax doing a field recording is followed by Lonesome Traveler saying, "Ok. Well, as you all saw on the screens it's around 1926 and this fella here came a long way just to get us to sing into that funny little box. A new thing called recording. He said people'd be able to hear us over and over for years to come." He's joined by a black woman called The Muse (her race is important to appreciating the banality of the dialogue she must repeat), played by Jennifer Leigh Warren. She chimes in helpfully, "Helpin' folks remember who we were and what we sung about." Lonesome continues, "That's right. But I coulda told him we'd been passing things along for a good long time already. You see, I know for an absolute fact that I was here long before I was born and I figure I'll be here long after I'm dead." Woman, laughing, "Now, if that doesn't make a lot of sense right now, you just stick around for a time; it's bound to come clear."

If that reads poorly, like some educational show thought up to play high schools in the 1970s, it plays even worse. Act One has a lot of this sort of banal dialogue. Act Two goes more heavily into the songs, but feels the need to include the corny jokes the big acts used to make while appearing in concert or on television. One would have been plenty. You'd never know from this sanitized presentation that folk music was a rebel-rousing, dangerous form of protest -- even though they tell you so.

Very typically, the song "Talking Union" is preceded by a lengthy passage explaining how folk singers felt the working man deserved a decent pay for a decent day's work and on and on about this injustice. Then of course they sing the tune...which makes the same point far more dramatically and effectively. Or at least it would have without the laborious set-up. Is this the sort of thing Pete Seeger and others have in concert, explaining a song that needs no explaining? Yes, so it's "authentic" but not very dramatic.

The singers are good and the arrangements by Dan Wheetman are to my amateur's ears pretty faithful. Act Two opener "There's A Meetin' Here Tonight" does the most effective job of showing how rural tunes and the blues were transformed into commercial folk with a gutbucket version gliding right into a smoother than smooth version your folks might have sung along with on the radio. They aren't making a value statement here and I agree: the first is certainly more moving but both have their charms. This brief passage does point to the road not taken by Lonesome Traveler of demonstrating musically the history and changes in folk music rather than talking about it.

But the presentation! First, the women are for some reason asked to carry the load of goofy, period-setting costume changes. True, the men put on and take off jackets, move from jeans to slacks and so on. But the women are asked to don headbands and dreadful wigs that emphasize the periods being depicted. This extends to performances of songs by Judy Collins and Joan Baez where they're asked to do imitations and fall flat. All the performances are certainly in the spirit of the originals but only the women are asked to ape them; why, I don't know. Much better if everyone just wore simple outfits and let the music set the scene.

The slideshows that take place throughout are also superfluous. When the time jumps from the early 1940s to the 1950s, do we really need a slide show reminding us of WW II? It's not the fault of multimedia designer David Mickey. I can't think of what slides one could choose to depict the Civil Rights movement other than the ones he chose that wouldn't seem overly familiar. But all the more reason to drop them completely. Other than identifying the acts, there's simply no need for screens and multimedia in the first place.

Far worse, however, is the frankly offensive depiction of blacks throughout the show. The fact that it's done by folks with the best of intentions almost makes it worse. An early scene shows Lomax recording black folk in their homes and it all takes place behind a gauzy screen. OK, I thought, maybe this is just a one-time thing since we've just jumped back in time. But no, time and again, when "authentic" black music is heard, it's often performed by the two black performers stuck behind a gauzy scrim. Anthony Manough spent so much time behind the scrim his whole impression of the audience is probably hazy and indistinct. He is also the lone man to have to don a ridiculous costume, in this case the prison garb that Leadbelly was forced to wear by promoters since audiences wanted the excitement of seeing a genuine jailbird. Yes, the smiling and genial Leadbelly gets out front in a suit later but he delivers that fact with such good nature you'd think it was an amusing misunderstanding rather than offensive.

When they sang "John Henry," Manough was back behind the scrim, his shirt off so we could see the gleaming black man pound away with his hammer. And in the jaw-dropping low point of the show, during one number (I don't even know which one I was so gobsmacked by what I saw), for no conceivable reason we see Manough on the left -- behind a scrim of course -- working in the fields doing some hoeing. On the right we see Warren doing laundry in a bucket, soaping up clothes on a washboard with a do-rag to hold up her hair. Other than the Lomax recording and a campfire sing-along, none of the other actors ever depict everyday activities like this. I honestly expected these two actors to suddenly stop what they were doing and walk off the stage for good.

Despite these indignities and horrible, folksy dialogue filled with down-home wisdom she somehow delivers with a straight face, Warren still managed to sing beautifully and with conviction. She was the show's standout and after all, these are classic songs. On the male side, Matty Charles was excellent as various figures like Woody Guthrie. I always looked forever to whenever he took center stage. (The Ian & Syliva duet on "Early Mornin' Rain" with Sylvie Davidson was a particular high point.)

But all the performers sang well. That certainly wasn't the problem. It was the entire, dutiful, earnest, repetitive and borderline offensive conception of the show that doomed it. Emotionally, the entire piece built up quite reasonably to Bob Dylan going electric. "It's All Over Now Baby Blue" is the literal climax of the show. I wondered, how would they do it? Strip it down to see what an enduring folk tune it would be even without the plugged-in guitar? Would the "Joan Baez" character do it? One of the men?

Instead, musical director Trevor Wheetman -- who had done superior work on multiple instruments all night, along with Sam Gelfer -- suddenly stepped up to the mike and sang away. Unfortunately, unlike every other person on stage, he is not a good singer. Do they actually think Dylan is not a good singer and it doesn't matter who performs it? (Dylan of course is one of the greatest and most influential singers of all time.) Were they just trying to give him a moment in the spotlight, never mind that it's the crucial climax of the show -- the moment when folk music is almost literally blown away by rock and roll? Wheetman could have performed during the intermission if they wanted to let him enjoy a moment of his own. Squandering the peak of the show to someone who can't even begin to do this classic justice was just the final nail in the coffin.

And still, still my love for folk music (if not my love for singing along) and the general high quality of singing lets me give this evening two stars. It's pleasant if a little boring and not nearly the show that folk music deserves.

THEATER OF 2015

Honeymoon In Vegas **
The Woodsman ***
Constellations ** 1/2
Taylor Mac's A 24 Decade History Of Popular Music 1930s-1950s ** 1/2
Let The Right One In **
Da no rating
A Month In The Country ** 1/2
Parade in Concert at Lincoln Center ** 1/2
Hamilton at the Public ***
The World Of Extreme Happiness ** 1/2
Broadway By The Year 1915-1940 **
Verite * 1/2
Fabulous! *
The Mystery Of Love & Sex **
An Octoroon at Polonsky Shakespeare Center *** 1/2
Fish In The Dark *
The Audience ***
Josephine And I ***
Posterity * 1/2
The Hunchback Of Notre Dame **
Lonesome Traveler **
On The Twentieth Century ***


_____________

Thanks for reading. Michael Giltz is the founder and CEO of the forthcoming website BookFilter, a book lover's best friend. It's a website that lets you browse for books online the way you do in a physical bookstore, provides comprehensive info on new releases every week in every category and offers passionate personal recommendations every step of the way. It's like a fall book preview or holiday gift guide -- but every week in every category. He's also the cohost of Showbiz Sandbox, a weekly pop culture podcast that reveals the industry take on entertainment news of the day and features top journalists and opinion makers as guests. It's available for free on iTunes. Visit Michael Giltz at his website and his daily blog. Download his podcast of celebrity interviews and his radio show, also called Popsurfing and also available for free on iTunes.

Note: Michael Giltz is provided with free tickets to shows with the understanding that he will be writing a review. All productions are in New York City unless otherwise indicated.

Yup, We Can't Believe These Were Taken Free of Charge Either

$
0
0
2015-03-10-1426015731-1297272-Grunged_Photo.png


I am a working photographer, trying to adapt, like many of my colleagues, to the rapidly changing landscape in the profession we love.

Today I would like to get a straight answer to a simple question: something that could help me terminally understand the current state of photography business better than any elaborate or academic theory.

Momentarily detached from the viewfinder, my eye briefly fell on the "shot on iPhone 6" campaign, where Apple is using clever, funny, colorful, sometimes truly lovely photos, taken with the device, from various parts of the world.

Then, I came across several articles in the social media celebrating these wonderful pictures used by Apple in their campaign ("yeeees, taken with an iPhone!!.... can you believe it?? !!! How cool is that??").

Then I noticed a selection of these images reproduced all over the web, on huge billboards, etc. and became aware that the photographer's credit appears on the photos (at least on those I saw today on the walls of Penn Station, here in New York), albeit not in full, but abbreviated.

I am familiar with the fact that Apple often welcomes iPhone photographers to publicly showcase images created with smart phones and edited with various "apps" in many of their stores across America, projecting the photos on a screen, during a Q&A session.

I also happen to know, based on personal experience, that Apple does not allow photography or videography during such events and does not compensate in any way the photographers they invite to present their work.

So, going back to the latest "shot on iPhone 6" Apple campaign, I ask myself: Has Apple given any compensation at all to the selected photographers for such a widespread and massive usage of their images on many platforms? Or have the creators of these photos just all agreed to donate their visual work, free of charge, feeling amply compensated just by the "coolness factor" of having their images used by Apple in such a grand scale campaign across America and the world?

At a time when many of my colleagues passionately debate about integrity of photo-journalism, while prestigious photographic prizes are awarded only to be hastily revoked after a few days, while photographic budgets and assignments suffer from an increasingly dysfunctional "shrinkage factor", while we are more confused than ever about copyright, licensing and attribution issues, I simply ask myself: Has Apple paid any bloody money at all for the images used in this promotional campaign for their latest phone?

I haven't been able to find an answer to this simple question yet and already a new, more important question in my mind: Do we call this photography democratization or exploitation?

Music And Writing

$
0
0
I didn't set out for my novel, Our Endless Numbered Days, to be a book filled with music but that's what it became. From the title to the resolution, music seems to be on every page.

So, let's get the title out of the way first. For all those Iron and Wine fans, the title does come from the album of the same name. I first came across Sam Beam's (aka Iron and Wine) music when I borrowed a CD of The Shepherd's Dog from my local library, ironically chosen because of its cover. I now own all his albums and listen to them on shuffle while I write -- I only need to play Iron and Wine on my iPod and my fingers are itching to type.

My novel had several earlier titles which I discarded (The Great Divide, The Briar Rose, Our Little Life). Our Endless Numbered Days is not only a wonderful phrase which rolls off the tongue, it also has a relevance to the story: When the narrator, Peggy Hillcoat is eight, she's taken by her father, James to live in a remote cabin in a forest. As well as telling her that the rest of the world has disappeared, he stops keeping a calendar and they lose track of their days.

But aside from the songs I listened to, music slipped in between all the words I wrote. Peggy's mother, Ute, is a German concert pianist who won't teach her daughter to play. Ute and James meet when he is her stand-in page turner at a concert at Philharmonic Hall in New York in 1962, conducted by Bernstein:

"Leonard was ein Liebchen... he first kissed me, and then he kissed Jackie Kennedy."

While they're in the forest James teaches Peggy to play the piano, but on one he's made himself out of bits of wood and pebbles. The piano is silent. My own father is a self-taught pianist and (even he would say) not concert-playing standard. When I was growing up I would often lie in bed falling asleep while listening to him playing the piano downstairs, just like Peggy does with Ute.

The main piece of music Peggy plays is "La Campanella" by Liszt. It's the only piece of sheet music James takes with him to the cabin, and so the only one that Peggy learns. It wasn't a piece I knew before I wrote the novel, but I was looking for something that was technically difficult, short and beautiful. The piano that the Hillcoats have at home is a Bösendorfer and in a wonderful moment of synchronicity I discovered a video produced by the piano manufacturer which is set to "La Campanella." Describing a piece of music in words is tricky; it's difficult to convey the intensity of it, how all-consuming it can be. Peggy describes parts of La Campanella as a trapped bird, fighting to escape. She uses the piece -- playing it over and over and singing it to herself -- as a mental escape. Meanwhile Ute uses her piano as an expression of her mood, thumping the keys and playing Chopin's funeral march to show she's unhappy with her husband.

As well as playing the piano, James and Peggy sometimes sing an old girl-guiding song together, the lyrics of which turned out to be very appropriate to the story:

There are suitors at my door, oh alaya bakia
Six or eight or maybe more, oh alaya bakia
And my father wants me wed, oh alaya bakia
Or at least that's what he said, oh alaya bakia


Although I was never a girl-guide, I learned this from a school friend many years ago and it's a song that I taught to my children when they were young for car journeys, or when they were tired on a long walk. For nostalgic reasons my daughter and I still sometimes sing it when we are making beds; my son has moved on to other, grown-up music!

Another childhood favorite of mine, which I passed onto Peggy, is the record of "The Railway Children." This was a vinyl album my sister owned which had scenes from the 1972 film (adapted from the book by E. Nesbit), with the actors speaking their lines inter-cut by the theme music. I played it so often I can recite whole chunks of it still. Peggy hums it when she's worrying about her father.

And then there's the piece of music that everyone knows: "Chopsticks." I'm ashamed to say I never even mastered this -- I can't play the piano. I learned the oboe at school for a while, but didn't get beyond sounding like an injured duck. And I sang in a band when I was a bit older, but we didn't have a microphone and I'm pretty confident no one could hear me. But in Our Endless Numbered Days, Peggy's younger brother teaches her "Chopsticks" on the Bösendorfer, much to Ute's horror.

At the end of the book it's the music of "La Campanella" that ultimately brings mother and daughter back together. Ute has no idea that Peggy learnt how to play the piano when she was in the forest, but finally Peggy is allowed to sit at the Bösendorfer:

"I pressed the keys... and let my fingers follow the flow and pattern they knew by heart. I was aware of Ute turning toward me, of a sharp intake of breath but I closed my eyes and went with the music. And when Ute propped open the piano lid, the room was filled with a magical sound...."

Placido Domingo Leads Top 20 NYC Opera Renaissance Performers in Honor of the Late Maestro Julius Rudel

$
0
0
Every one of the Rose Theater's 1,100 seats was filled for a opera concert produced by NYCO Renaissance, an effort to revive the defunct New York City Opera, for a two-hour concert and later a gala dinner celebrating the life of the opera's late Maestro Julius Rudel. My entrepreneurial endeavors to build a NYC hotel had led me to this beautiful hall at Jazz in Lincoln Center in the Time Warner Center - but I'll come back to that.

The extraordinary Maestro Rudel was General Director and Principal Conductor of the New York City Opera from 1957 to 1979. Later, following his successful debut at the Metropolitan Opera with Placido Domingo as "Werther," Maestro Rudel conducted hundreds of opera performances in the world's leading opera houses and as well as many orchestral performances all over the world. He guest-conducted 268 performances at the Metropolitan Opera alone.

2015-03-13-1426230989-1426631-1placidodomingo.jpg


Placido Domingo conducting the New York City Opera Orchestra


2015-03-13-1426231124-5155737-VG2015GalaOperaNYCOR29.jpg


Placido Domingo singing Verdi with Maestro Pallo conducting


Maestro Rudel was a certified star-maker - he gave to the young Placido Domingo the plum title role of the 8th century Spanish king in Ginastera's Don Rodrigo at the 1966 opening of Lincoln Center as the new home of the New York City Opera (NYCO). It is no wonder then that Mr. Domingo honored his mentor passionately in his speech after he sang and later conducted and directed the orchestra. His son Alvaro was with him backstage.

2015-03-13-1426231231-179132-received_10153206544257704.jpeg


Placido Domingo honors the late Maestro Julius Rudel


2015-03-13-1426231308-2274706-0418_NYCO_SocialAssets_022015_01.jpg


With just $17 in his pocket, Julius Rudel moved to New York at age 17 from his home in Vienna, Austria, when the country was annexed by Hitler in 1938. He studied conducting on full scholarship at Mannes College of Music, then started his career at NYCO as an unpaid rehearsal pianist and general factotum. In 1944, he made his conducting debut with the company. He rose through the ranks to become the top honcho of The People's Opera. Combining European tradition with innovation, he turned NYCO into the most influential and daring opera company in the U.S. After just 15 months of being its director, Rudel surprised the world of arts by NYCO offering of first of three full seasons of American opera in inventive productions.

2015-03-13-1426231437-2731696-VG2015GalaOperaNYCOR32.jpg


NYCO Renaissance General Director Michael Capasso


NYCO Renaissance General Director Michael Capasso has this to say about Maestro Rudel:

"There are few among us who can remember a time when Julius Rudel wasn't a fixture on the New York cultural scene. For opera fans of my generation, it seemed as though he had always been there, and always would be. We all remember him as a formidable and versatile musician, with an uncanny ability to recognize and nurture nascent talent, and as the artistic and organizational leadership of New York City Opera. What is not often remembered is that without Maestro Rudel, there would have been no City Opera to lead."


2015-03-13-1426231558-8095790-VG2015GalaOperaNYCOR33.jpg


David Leigh, Sidney Outlaw, Adam Bonanni, Heather Johnson, William Fergusson with Pacien Mazzagatti, conducting



Many artists who built their careers under the influence of the late Maestro were present that night to celebrate his life and perform for him in thanksgiving, and among them is Christine Goerke. Her Verdi that night captivated me and stood out for me as a luminous performance that elegantly complemented Placido Domingo's brilliance. Michael Corvino's baritone that night was rich and powerful.

They were joined by John Holiday, who filled in at the last minute for David Daniels, Frederica von Stade, Ailyn Perez, and Mark Delavan. Adam Bonanni, Olga Busuioc, Michael Chioldi, William Ferguson, Joshua Guerrero, Joelle Harvey, Heather Johnson, David Leigh, Emily Misch, and Sidney Outlaw, all of whom performed beautifully. The performers lent their efforts to honor Maestro Rudel, but also to help welcome the dawn of a renewed and reinvigorated NYC Opera through the revival efforts of NYCO Renaissance, which is the plan favored by the defunct company and chosen as the winning bid in a recent Court auction.

They performed great compositions by Johann Strauss II, Handel, Mozart, Ravel, Verdi, Sorozabal, Floyd, Picker, Sondheim, Gordon, Weill and Bernstein with Pacien Mazzagatti, James Meena, Steven Osgood, Imre Pallo and Gary Thor Wedow conducting the New York City Opera Orchestra. Musica Sacra provided the vibrant choral singing.

A film tribute to Rudel was shown at the middle of the program, following moving words by Maestro Rudel's son Tony. Late in the program came the world premiere of "The Waking", a concert aria on the poem of Theodore Roethke sung brilliantly by Kristin Sampson. The piece was Tobias Picker's gift to NYCO Renaissance to "celebrate its plan to revive" The People's Opera, and its "waking" from an "era of sleep". Picker further said, "The voice of the poem is that of NYCO itself - the People's Opera - with Julius Rudel, countless artists and devoted patrons in the 'waking' of its eighth decade."


2015-03-13-1426231710-8737629-roy.jpg


NYCO Renaissance Chairman of the Board Roy Niederhoffer



Roy Niederhoffer, NYCO Renaissance Chairman of the Board, reminisced, "When I first arrived in New York City after graduating from college, the first two things I bought were an upright piano and a subscription to New York City Opera. Long before philanthropy was a pursuit, or even a remote possibility, long before I could afford to be a major donor or a Board member, I was a devoted fan of City Opera."

He further adds, "The performances I saw there as a young man created an excitement I could find nowhere else. I remember the brilliance and passion of the artists (many of whom were just beginning their star careers), the innovative productions (sometimes quite minimal) that took my breath away again and again, the diverse repertoire from Handel novelties to rediscovered 'classics' and even musicals. And what other company would give me the opportunity to see an opera on a weeknight and play softball with members of the cast that weekend? City Opera was vibrant, authentic, and accessible, a family of artists, staff, management, and audience that I was excited and honored to be a part of."

2015-03-13-1426232004-5215061-10460503_10153208586002704_7255083128224489678_n.jpg


Michael Chioldi, Kristin Sampson, Maestro Steven Osgood, Mark Delavan, Christine Goerke


The champagne cocktail before the concert enabled everyone to meet and greet each other as well as take photos with the artists and performers. Many aspiring singers and composers also attended the concert. The spirit of the evening was "what's the latest?" on the revival of City Opera.

2015-03-13-1426231850-6177122-11009849_10153208601002704_5852292539070177995_n.jpg



Victoria Vysotina, Tiberius Vadan and his wife, and me


Along with the Rudel family, the Board of Directors of NYCO Renaissance was in full attendance that night: Chairman of the Board Roy Niederhoffer, President of the Board Jeffrey Laikind, Gala Vice Chair Carol Acunto, General Director Michael Capasso, and Members Tiberius Vadan, Eliahu Bar, Mara Kaplan Pruzanski, Victoria Vysotina, and me.

2015-03-13-1426232093-1224835-20150309_214149.jpg


The gala dinner at the Appel Room


We had our dessert at the spacious Ertegun Atrium after our hearty dinner at the Appel Room where we heard inspiring speeches from Michael Capasso and Roy Niederhoffer. The decorations were festive orange and blue, reflecting New York City (and NYCO Renaissance's) colors, and the magnificent view of Central Park and Columbus Circle provided an inspiring backdrop to celebrate NYCO Renaissance's plan to bring back The People's Opera.

2015-03-13-1426232533-4586209-10922599_10153208604717704_7129486848684580415_n.jpg
Tony Rudel



Roy told the audience that the company's six-opera season will be announced later this year. There are clearly many many people (Julius Rudel undoubtedly included) who want to see The People's Opera flourish once again. And what better location than the beautiful Rose Hall to host a beautiful evening and a compelling new opera company?

Later in the night, I was having my picture taken when I saw a mother and her three siblings fighting for the stage with me. They are the entrepreneurial Carpenters living in the Plaza Hotel, and are known for playing and selling Stradivarius violins. We chatted for a moment, and found a lot of things in common between David, Sean and Lauren Carpenter. The Carpenters own Carpenter Fine Violins, a dealer in rare stringed instruments, with David as CEO and Lauren as COO. Their brother David Aaron is the CFO. Sean and Lauren are both accomplished violinists, while David is a world-renowned violist - they perform together often. I am eager to see how they can perform in my hotel one day.

Joshua Bell, the Grammy Award-winning violinist and conductor, was also there to lend support. I last saw him perform "The Man who Invented Beer" with my mother a couple of years ago. He has been a frequent guest at my home, The Soho Loft, for the last decade.

2015-03-13-1426232365-3401667-1david.jpg


Joshua Bell joined us during the cocktails


Bruce Lipnick, a patron of the arts for decades, was also at the gala concert and told me that he strongly supports the re-opening of "The People's Opera". He believes "it is part and parcel of New York City's legacy to its people. Its quest to let talented artists grow and hone their craft is a noble endeavor". He owns a startup called Ver-on-Demand which collects videos of opera, ballet, musical concerts and other live performances, allowing viewers to enjoy them in the comforts of their own homes. He will be offering it online to the general public by 2015 on a subscription basis.

All these things inspired me to launch and organize fundraising events for the revival of this important opera company at my hotel on Fifth Avenue which I intend to become a premier venue supporting the arts. Beyond this, I recently agreed to be the patron of a young singer and produce her performance at Carnegie Hall. To further the cause of the arts, I am planning weekly musical gatherings at our friends' Upper East Side apartment to entertain and support artists. I encourage you to join me as we help support the arts in New York.

Tavis Smiley: My Conversation With Lenny Kravitz

$
0
0
Tonight on PBS I'm joined by Grammy-winning musician Lenny Kravitz, whose recent foray into photography is the subject of a new exhibit at the Leica Gallery and companion coffee table book, both entitled "Flash."

As someone constantly in the public eye, Kravitz decided during his world tour to turn his camera on the folks -- professionals and fans -- who turn their cameras on him. The result is a surreal exploration into what he sees from day to day.

In the clip below, we discuss the responsibility he feels when he meets his fans.



For more of our conversation, be sure to tune in to Tavis Smiley on PBS. Check our website for your local TV listings: www.pbs.org/tavis.

Kendrick Lamar, To Pimp a Butterfly's Devotional Bandleader

$
0
0
To Pimp a Butterfly has me excited to make music. It reminds me how important music is to my everyday existence. It's an inspiring record, an incendiary lyrical tour de force and a stylistic mashup that's elevated the G-Funk era with a set of more organic twists. Kendrick's cabinet runs deep: although the producer/collaborator count runs close to two dozen, the album's sonic expansiveness is cohesive, dynamic and jammed with live instrumentation. Intros and outros snake through song forms, paving a road both perfect for low-riders or your MTA of choice. When was the last time you heard clarinet on a hip-hop record? This is it.

If a little Googling is correct, that's Pedro Castro, a clarinetist with four YouTube videos and a solid writeup in the Pasadena City College Courier. But his performance on "Institutionalized" is not as anonymous; rather it's part of the deep musical fabric that Kendrick, a decidedly hands-on foreman, has curated on his third full-length. To Pimp a Butterfly paints with colors that resemble, if I may use the C word, classic hip-hop -- the album feels more like De La Soul, A Tribe Called Quest and 2Pac, all of whom made records that duck and weave in their bounce. While the latter's brilliance obviously inspired the Kendrick behind 2011's Section.80, the emcee of this week's surprise release is more worldly, part of which owes to the feeling that he's become a true bandleader.

From the jump, we get a mood beyond that of 2012's good kid, m.A.A.d city -- the last time we heard George Clinton like this was on "Synthesizer," from Outkast's 1998 masterpiece Aquemini. The Atlanta duo remains a major influence throughout, and their perpetual collaborations with production team Organized Noize mirrors the setup at Kendrick's label, Top Dawg Entertainment, which employees an in-house production crew that's all over To Pimp a Butterfly. Neal Pogue, who engineered Aquemini said of those sessions, "It was almost like a Motown, that's what we had. Or like a Stax Records thing. That's what I loved about it. It brought back that whole feeling of making records. It was organic."

That feeling pervades To Pimp a Butterfly, which owes much to Thundercat's bass playing, more nuanced than ever, and Bilal's vocals. The Bay Area singer has been making genre-smashing R&B for years, and his style surely informed this album.

Organic is nothing new in hip-hop, a genre we often imagine being made on machines from choppy chunks of music that already exists, but in 1993 a little band called The Roots independently put out Organix, which changed my world. The idea that such a powerful genre, one that saw a concentration of incredible music that year, could be created with live instruments connected hip-hop to the spheres of jazz, funk and rock, which seemed to live disparately in my musical mind. The career trajectory of that little band is just as inspiring - they've pushed envelopes on every stage, including that of latenight television, not failing to get political when necessary.

Of course, hip-hop has seen live instrumentation elsewhere, but it wasn't billed as the work of a band (e.g. Ron Carter, on the bass). The same arrangement is true on To Pimp a Butterfly, which combines the LA languidity of The Pharcyde with Dr. Dre's aggressive bounce, so emblematic of the West Coast. But there's also a spirituality, one learned from the coastal feuds of the '90s that took hip-hop's co-rulers, one that pays homage to the past yet looks squarely towards the future. It feels at times like a Soulquarians opus or a J Dilla joint -- collective musicality and compromise triumph over ego, themes that echo in Kendrick's words.

"Egos kill. Not only you but everybody around you," he said at 24. "The caterpillar is a prisoner to the streets that conceived it. Its only job is to eat or consume everything around it in order to protect itself form this mad city... the butterfly represents the talent, the thoughtfulness and the beauty inside the caterpillar," says present day Kendrick, sounding as thoughtful as ever.

I like thoughtfulness in my music. I like to hear collaboration, which is why I love jazz, or, if I've read my Nicholas Payton*, Black American Music (#BAM -- do I need the hashtag?). "From a genealogical standpoint," says Payton, "It becomes very clear to a knowledgable listener whose music has been informed by the Black tradition and whose hasn't. That will never happen with jazz because it's a bastardized tradition that has no foundation outside of a commercial structure. It's not a communal language, it's a capitalist one." Hip-hop has certainly been speaking that language, and it's refreshing to hear something serious that stops putting materialism on a pedestal. Although flashiness and braggadocio have been essential to the art form since the beginning, the past decade has been overly concerned with material gain.

Or, as Kendrick notes in "Hood Politics":

Critics want to mention that they miss when hip hop was rappin' / Motherfucker if you did, then Killer Mike'd be platinum / Y'all priorities are fucked up, put energy in wrong shit / Hennessy and Crown Vic, my memory been gone since.


There's hints of an A Love Supreme vibe here, and in a way some of the work is devotional. No surprise from the man who said, "All I am is just a vessel, doing his [God's] work." That attitude, notes pianist Ethan Iverson, "seeks ecstasy through communion, not just with God but with every one in the immediate vicinity. You don't practice it. You plug into the ancestors and your reason for living and it's there."

Also no surprise that multi-instrumentalist Terrace Martin, who produced much of the album, compared Kendrick to "Coltrane, man. Mild-mannered, soft-spoken, always practicing. New harmonic approaches, different techniques, falls in -- there's not a mistake on that stage with him. If the turntables fall, he gon' -- like, it's weird. It's like water."**

"I think that's why a lot of motherfuckers fuck with me," the rapper said, "Because the shit I put out on my music is me not knowing everything. It's me trying to figure out the world just like you." Although he's gained confidence in the past three years, his allowance for musical sensitivity, nuance and harmonic richness gives the album weight, which makes for a statement not without its warts. The inclusion of the live version of "i" is a conscious illustration of this (Kendrick is certainly striving for Black Thought status in his ability to front a band) and his willingness to perform an untitled song on national television that was written the day before "cause we didn't want to do nothing that's already been done" - these things explain why To Pimp a Butterfly was streamed almost 10 million times in one day.

I'm on board with Kendrick. I would've loved an Elmer Bernstein sample somewhere, but I'll live.



*Payton collaborators from Virginia band Butcher Brown are all over the record.
**In that same interview, Martin mentions Snarky Puppy, whose drummer Robert "Sput" Searight can be found on the album.

Temporary Space LA: An Alternative Exhibition Platform

$
0
0
2015-03-19-1426779058-3995195-Richard_Shelton.jpg


Richard Shelton: Photo by John Seed


Temporary Space LA, which opens its first physical location on Saturday, March 21 at 5522 Wilshire Blvd, is meant as an alternative to the traditional gallery model. Dreamed up by artists Richard Shelton and Stacie Meyer, it was conceived to help artists have more control of the sale and display of their art. Designed to serve "mid-career" artists who have been working for at least 20 years, Temporary Space will present both physical and digital exhibitions of their artwork. It will also connect artists and art buyers directly without a "dealer" serving as an intermediary.

2015-03-19-1426780545-9919139-temp_space.jpg


Temporary Space LA


Artists themselves will decide which artworks will be on view in the gallery's physical space where technologically based tools, including digital archives and spoken commentaries by art historians and others, will enhance the understanding of each artist's work and career. It's an ideal situation for artist/curators who want to take control of the presentation of their own work, and who want to have a complete digital archive of their work assembled. One of the ideas behind the project is that mid and late career artists have been under-appreciated -- both critically and economically -- and Temporary Space hopes to rectify this by making years worth of work visible and available.

2015-03-19-1426781091-2201888-billboard.jpg


A Temporary Space billboard on view in Los Angeles


Sales of artwork will be worked out between each artist and their collectors. There will also be opportunities for buyers to purchase digitally on the Temporary Space website, or interact directly with the artists at their studio. The space's commission rate is fixed at 25 percent, less than the typical 40-50 percent rate charged by traditional galleries.

"What we are doing here," says Richard Shelton, whose own work will be on view in the space's first exhibition, "is bringing the art gallery experience into the 21st century." After Shelton's two-part show, exhibitions of works by Margaret Neilsen and Scott Greiger will follow before Temporary Space moves to a new downtown location at the end of 2015. Temporary Space is an ambitious project that is intended to move, morph and evolve over time. With its commitment to technological innovation and mission to present art and artists in a more complete, direct fashion, Temporary Space will be an experiment very much worth watching.

TEMPORARY SPACE LA
5522 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, 90036

Opening: Saturday, March 21, 2015, 6 - 10 PM
To RSVP or for more information: (323) 297-8464

Richard Shelton: 50 Years of Painting
Curated by Fatemeh Burnes
Part One: March 21 - May 2, 2015

Links:

An interview with Richard Shelton, Stacie Meyer, and Melissa Urcan.

Flying Apples and China Teapots: Gandini Juggling Smashed

$
0
0
2015-03-19-1426782674-7802080-smashed002.jpg
Gandini Juggling in Smashed (Photo: Ludovic des Cognets, courtesy Hong Kong Arts Festival)

"I always wanted to waltz in Berlin," warbled American songwriter Jack Little blithely in a World War II ditty, "the way things look, we'll be waltzing right in... right in to Germany." With that tune, Gandini Juggling waltzed into our hearts in the opening number of Smashed, which opened Tuesday night at the Hong Kong Arts Festival.

You don't have to peel too many layers to get to the dark heart of Smashed, but the astonishing deftness with which this troupe of nine keep apples and crockery flying through the air to the accompaniment of Tammy Wynette, Louis Armstrong, and Bach, the gaiety and ludicrousness of it all, kept the audience in stitches.

With the ghost of Pina Bausch visible in the wings, the descent into chaos seemed inevitable. Precise formations and complex, mathematically driven sequences in which the performers periodically pilfer a flying apple, without skipping a beat, gradually start to unwind. Attempts at sabotage intensify, in elaborate schemes that test the jugglers' virtuosity and create achingly beautiful spectacles.

The nonchalance displayed by these athlete-dancers belies their arduous training and powers of concentration. In this ingenious piece of dance theatre, juggling is the language the dancers use to convey their moods, desires, and frustrations - like the sensual pas de deux in which the dancers' bodies intertwine while they keep apples hurtling through space, or roll apples down each other's bodies.

Juggling is also a metaphor for the order we try to impose on our lives, for our carving out of personal space, and for our daily routines - many of which, as Bausch often reminded us, are pointless and absurd.

As in much of Bausch's work, the performers place each other in awkward, uncomfortable situations: women are pawed by the men; one man is deliberately ostracized; come-ons are unreciprocated; an apple is pitched like a fastball, nearly grazing another performer's head. Tragic country diva Tammy Wynette intones "sometimes it's hard to be a woman," and urges women to "stand by your man," as the two female jugglers crawl on all fours, in a bizarre assembly line, while the men roll apples off their backs.

2015-03-19-1426782844-508355-smashed003.jpg
Gandini Juggling in Smashed (Photo: Ludovic des Cognets, courtesy Hong Kong Arts Festival)

There is a wide-eyed, kooky charm to some of the games these dancers play. One woman carefully hoards apples under her skirt. She then approaches each of the men in turn. They are sitting in chairs. She stands in front of one of them, her legs straddling his chair, then plops an apple in his lap. She repeats this with each of them. The effect is ineffably sweet rather than provocative.

The air of gleeful innocence rapidly erodes as Sean Gandini, chief mischief-maker, charges around the stage, rolled-up newspaper in hand, ambushing his comrades and whacking apples out of the air, to the crooning of The Ink Spots ("That Cat is High"). Apples are plummeting everywhere. Stunned at first, the dancers quickly embrace anarchy, wicked grins on their faces. The china tea sets are next; the stage becomes a war zone. (Pretty exciting for the spectators seated in the front row of the intimate Studio Theatre at Hong Kong's Cultural Centre. And an enormous job for the clean-up crew at the end of the evening.)

The choice of Baroque opera to accompany this section is inspired: "Gelido in ogni vena" from Vivaldi's Farnace echoes the tumult of the era, the lawlessness, the constant warfare, volatility, and social upheaval. Baroque opera often conveyed the rawest of emotions, as in this aria:

I feel my blood like ice
Coursing through every vein
The ghost of my lifeless son
Fills me with terror
And to make my agony worse
I see that I was cruel
To an innocent soul
To my heart's beloved


Miraculously, our nine intrepid jugglers emerged from the carnage unscathed, their sense of humour undimmed.



- Gandini Juggling in Smashed runs through March 22nd, 2015 at the Hong Kong Arts Festival. -
Viewing all 14859 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>